Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1977 Page 1 of about 26 results (0.077 seconds)

Jul 05 1977 (HC)

Harihar Pershad Jaiswal Vs. Suresh Jaiswal and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-05-1977

Reported in : AIR1978AP13

..... the minor was actually living with her mother at vaghel village which was within the jurisdiction of the mehasana district court. against this decision of the single judge, a letters patents appeal had been filed and a division bench of the gujarat high court has clearly observed that court at palanpur had no jurisdiction to try the original petition as the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 1977 (HC)

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Dr. K.P. Karanth

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-15-1977

Reported in : [1983]139ITR479(AP)

..... a consideration for the grant, the assessee was to pay 5 per cent. royalty on the net selling price of all laminated products made and sold in accordance with those patented processes. when the total of the royalty payments reached 5,000, the assessee was no more liable to pay the royalty. the supreme court held that the payments made by ..... case. 18. in hylam ltd. v. cit : [1973]87itr310(ap) which was also decided by this court, the assessee entered into an agreement with an english company to use some patented process of manufacture. by that agreement, the english company granted to the assessee an exclusive non-assignable licence to manufacture laminates, in accordance with the processes covered by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 1977 (HC)

Jokam Reddy and ors. Vs. Gokar Mallaiah

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-17-1977

Reported in : AIR1977AP367

..... regular appeal. we have reached the same conclusion of dismissing the petition for condonation of the delay through another reasoning. 14. in the result, the letters patent appeal is dismissed with costs. now that the appeal is rejected on the ground that it was not presented within the time allowed by the law of ..... appeal and restored the ex parte mortgage decree. it was held that limitation ran from the date of the restoration by the high court. that was patently for the reason that until the high court restored it, there was no ex parte decree, which could be challenged in an appeal because that was ..... as the fresh starting point of limitation. this latter limb of the learned counsel's argument is once again founded on section 14. the two limbs are patently two facets of the same argument based on section 14. 7. this argument is devoid of merits. section 14 of the limitation act has no application ..... condonation of delay was untenable. in the view he took, he dismissed the petition under section 5. the unsuccessful defendants 1 to 12 have preferred this letters patent appeal. 4. sri n. c. v. ramanujachari appearing for the appellants argued that the view of the learned judge is wrong and that it is open ..... 3 years 6 months and 22 days. punnayya, j. dismissed the petition filed under section 5 of the indian limitation act to condone the delay. this letters patent appeal is against that judgment of dismissal. 2. a suit was filed to recover a sum of rs. 5,500 and was numbered as o. s. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 1977 (HC)

P. Ranga Redy and ors. Vs. Golla Sambasivarao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-06-1977

Reported in : AIR1978AP97

..... to appeal under cl. 15 of the letters patent of the high court shall be made orally and immediately after the judgment has been delivered.'37. the date on which the judgment was delivered in ..... that rule 105 of the appellate side rules of andhra pradesh disentitles the defendants even otherwise to apply for leave under cl. 15 of the letters patent. that rule reads thus:'when an appeal against the appellate decree or order has been heard and disposed of by a single judge, application for leave ..... being in force. we are concerned in this case with the non obstante clause in so far as it relates to the provisions contained in the letters patent for the high court, the particular clause concerned being cl. 15. which reads thus:' appeal from the courts of original jurisdiction to the high court ..... the respondents requested for grant of leave to appeal under cl. 15 of the letters patent four or five days after the date of the delivery of judgment. that was opposed by sri rajasekhara reddi learned counsel appearing for the appellants on the ..... single judge as required under r. 105 of the andhra pradesh high court appellate side rules for leave to appeal under cl. 15 of the letters patent of the high court orally and immediately after the judgment had been delivered on feb. 17, 1977.6. sri ramamohana rao, learned counsel appearing for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 1977 (HC)

Raja Reddy Vs. Anusuyamma and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-05-1977

Reported in : AIR1977AP342

..... that though the order was passed on 20-4-1976, an appeal was preferred as against the said order and when the appeal was dismissed by muktadar, j., this letters patent appeal was preferred. the result is that the proceedings for arrest must be deemed to be continuing and pending.10. the following principles regarding the retrospective effect of a statute ..... whether the case has been made out for arrest on the merits on the ground that he has sufficient means to pay his debts but is evading payment. the letters patent appeal is allowed, but in the circumstances without costs and the appellant is directed to be released forthwith.21. appeal allowed.

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 1977 (HC)

Nandipati Rami Reddi and ors. Vs. Nandipati Padma Reddy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-02-1977

Reported in : AIR1978AP30

..... judge's court, gudivada, by the present 1st respondent (in the letters patent appeal) for partition of certain properties and for possession of a share therein. he impleaded four defendants to the suit. the first defendant was his own father, ..... defendant was not heard along with that civil miscellaneous appeal, it is brought up for decision along with the letters patent appeal preferred by the 2nd defendant against the dismissal of his civil miscellaneous appeal. 3. o. s. no. 6/70, was filed in the subordinate ..... for consideration before our learned brother a. v. krishna rao, j., who dismissed it .hence the letters patent appeal by the 2nd defendant 6. sri n. bapi raju, learned counsel for the appellant in the letters patent appeal argues , and the same argument is adopted by sri m . krishna mohana rao , learned counsel for ..... relate to the same dispute and arise out of the same order, we will dispose them of under a common judgment. the letters patent appeal has been preferred by the 2nd defendant while the civil miscellaneous appeal has been preferred by the 1st defendant. indeed, the letters ..... patent appeal is preferred against the civil miscellaneous appeal which was filed by the 2nd defendant. since the appeal preferred by the 1st .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 1977 (HC)

V. Appannammanayuralu Vs. B. Sreeramulu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-07-1977

Reported in : AIR1978AP160

..... parties to it. 16. the same principles were laid down by the division benches of this court in l.i.c. of india v. t. tirupathayya, : air1963ap353 and letters patent appeal 155 of 1974, d/- 21-12-1976 : ( ( 1977) 2 andh wr 270) consisting of one of us ( sambasiva rao, j. then acting chief justice) and ..... passed by the court, unless such over-valuation or under-valuation has prejudicially affected the disposal of the suit or appeal on its merits. this section is patently founded on the principle that a court's decree shall not be affected on the ground of its lack of pecuniary jurisdiction if it had inherent jurisdiction to ..... suffer from inherent lack of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal when it was presented before it. the judgment-debtor, aggrieved by that decision, has filed this letters patent appeal.3. sri ranganadham appearing for the appellant contended that it is undoubted that the forum of appeal is fixed with reference to the date of institution of ..... sambasiva rao, j.1. what is inherent lack of jurisdiction? this is the crucial question we will have to answer while deciding this letters patent appeal. 2. it has arisen out of execution proceedings. the respondent has levied execution of a decree he had obtained in a. s. no. 198 ..... execution is a nullity.23. in the result, we uphold the view taken by our learned brother gangadhara rao, j., and dismiss the letters patent appeal. in the circumstances of the case, we direct the parties to bear their own costs.24. appeal dismissed. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 1977 (HC)

Makkala Narsimlu Vs. Gunnala Raghunandan Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-20-1977

Reported in : AIR1977AP374

sambasiva rao, j. 1. the principal question raised in this letters patent appeal is about the compensation awarded by our learned brother sriramulu, j., for failure to perform a contract. the defendant, against whom the compensation was awarded by our learned brother, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 1977 (HC)

Meram Pocham and anr. Vs. the Agent to the State Government, (Collecto ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-25-1977

Reported in : AIR1978AP242

..... s. 47 was deleted and s. 50-b was enacted in the state of karnataka. that makes a vital difference. quite apart from that, it is patent from the decision that the transferee could support his possession under s. 53-a of t.p. act and he could call upon the transferor to give him ..... property act. the learned judge referred to syed jalal's case : air1970ap19 , his own decision in s. a. no.520 of 1968 and that in the letters patent appeal 139 of 1970; (ilr (1974( andh pra 119) and concluded that the view he had taken in s. a. 520 of 1968 had found favour with ..... that until and unless the invalid transfers are validated, they (the invalid transfers) continue to be invalid. therefore, we do not consider that this bench decision in letters patent appeal no. 139 of 1970; (ilr (1974) andh pra 119), is in any way contrary to the view, we have expressed. moreover this case was not ..... be invoked. having made all these observations, the division bench agreed with the final conclusion of madhava reddy, j. in the second appeal and dismissed the letters patent appeal.29. two features are worthy of note in this decision of the division bench. one is that it expressed concurrence with the decision of the earlier ..... for the validation under s. 50-b. in fact that was the observation made by the learned judge which we have extracted.27. it is against this decision letters patent appeal no.139 of 1970: (ilr (1974) andh pra 119), was preferred and gopal rao ekbote, j. (as he then was) and sriramulu, j. disposed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 1977 (HC)

M. Reddannam Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-21-1977

Reported in : [1980]46STC232(AP)

..... . while coming to this conclusion the division bench relied upon the full bench decision of the madras high court in nagarathanammal v. ibrahim, : air1955mad305 . this decision of the division bench patently does not support the contention put forward on behalf of the petitioner. on the other hand, as pointed out above, the division bench held that by virtue of s. 3 ..... be noted. the power exercisable by virtue of cl. (1) of section 3 has application to regulation in force by 1828 but also to regulations which might be thereafter enacted. patently the governor in council intended that the provisions of cl. (1) shall apply to all regulations which would be enacted thereafter as well. the word 'enacted' indicates making an act .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //