Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 10 results (0.035 seconds)

Nov 19 1981 (HC)

Arun Kumar Vs. the Special Secretary, Health, Housing and Municipal Ad ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-19-1981

Reported in : AIR1982AP472

..... judgement which constitutes a decree and not an order, the appellant is liable to pay on the memorandum of letters patent appeal, the same court-fee which was payable in the lower courts, by virtue of the provisions of section 49 of the act. the reference ..... was payable. this case far from supporting the contention of the appellant supports the view taken by us that appeals filed under clause 15 of the letters patents against orders are governed by sch. ii, article 3 (iii) (a) (2).10. in the instant case, the appeal having been filed against a ..... of the single judge in the case of judgment passed in exercise of second appellate jurisdiction. the expression 'judgment' in clause 15 of the letters patent means only final orders, decrees or judgment and not orders, where the effect of them do not put an end to the suit or proceedings. ..... appeal against either a decree or an order made by the subordinate court in exercise of its appellate jurisdiction. under clause 15 of the letters patent, an appeal shall lie to a division bench against the judgment of a single judge in exercise of the original or appellate jurisdiction and with ..... the value of the which exceeds one thousand .. .. ..... ten rupees. (b) in any other case ..... five rupees where the appeal is under clause 15 of the letters patent---- (a) from an order passed in exercise of appellate jurisdiction. ... ten rupees.. (b) in any other case.. ...... one hundred rupees'. section 49 of the act reads .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1981 (HC)

Budda Veeraiah and ors. Vs. K. Lakshminarasimha Reddy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-13-1981

Reported in : AIR1982AP380

..... defendant has not preferred any appeal or cross-objections with regard to the decree passed for refund of rs. 7000/- and therefore, the same cannot be interfered with in letters patent appeal. but, it is contended by the learned counsel for the respondents that under order 41, rule 33 c.p.c. the said decree for refund can be set aside ..... ramachandra rao, j.1. the plaintiffs are the appellants in this letters patent appeal preferred against the judgment of our learned brother raguvir j.2. the plaintiffs-appellants filed the suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell, ex. a-1 dated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 1981 (HC)

P. Sainath Reddy and ors. Vs. G. Narayana Reddy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-29-1981

Reported in : AIR1982AP247

ramachandra rao, j.1. this letters patent appeal is preferred against the judgment of justice s. h. sheth dismissing the civil miscellaneous appeal and confirming the order of the trial court dismissing the execution petition filed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 1981 (HC)

Gaddam Narsa Reddy and ors. Vs. Collector, Adilabad District and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-21-1981

Reported in : AIR1982AP1

..... purchaser from invoking the principles of part--performance to protect his possession after section 47 is deleted from the statute book.'in that view, the learned judges of the letters patent bench held that since section 47 was deleted, the obstruction to transfer was removed and the statutory right under section 53-a of he transfer of property act would be ..... (reported in ilr (1974) andh pra 119) preferred against the decision of madhava reddy, j, in second appeal no. 520/68 (reported in ilr (1972) andh pra 1313), the letters patent bench observed as follows:-'we think that the position materially alters section 47 is removed. it is true that section 98 continues to hold the field. under that provisions, a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 1981 (HC)

Bejgam Veeranna, Venkata Narasimhulu and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Prad ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-11-1981

Reported in : AIR1981AP350

..... this court were to hold that ex. b-6 would operate as an effective estoppel against the governmentthis court would, in effect, be granting legal sanctity to what is a patently illegal and ultra vires act of the executive government. it would also amount to imparting impotency to the legislature to protect the society through the executive. as that obviously cannot .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 23 1981 (HC)

M.S. Sharma Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-23-1981

Reported in : (1982)IILLJ40AP

..... was difference of opinion between the two learned judges. the papers were, therefore, placed before the hon'ble the chief justice for necessary orders under clause 36 of the letters patent. the hon'ble chief justice referred the matter to me. thus this appeal came up before me for hearing. 2. the appellant and the third respondent were recruited at one .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 1981 (HC)

Kanyakaparameswari Trading Company and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-17-1981

Reported in : [1983]54STC135(AP)

..... authority in the immediate presence of the petitioners and this statement is adverse to his interest. the conduct of k. v. satyanarayana in making the two different statements is too patent to be ignored. he wanted to play a game for his advantage in the absence of the petitioners; but when he was examined by the assessing authority in the immediate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 23 1981 (HC)

Nand Kishore Vs. Commissioner of Police

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-23-1981

Reported in : 1982CriLJ1439

..... field in support of the writ petition it is badly stated that no documents whatsoever was supplied to him. this is patently false. in the course of the arguments it is stated that no documents whatsoever supplied to him. that is patently false. in the course of the arguments it is stated the material supplied is not sufficient to make effective representations .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 1981 (HC)

Shahzadi Begum Vs. Mohd. Abdul Gaffar

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-31-1981

Reported in : 1981CriLJ1532

..... with her husband or as a matter of fact, any wife living with him, if he had re-married. i, therefore, hold that the judgment of the learned judge is patently incorrect. 12. consequently, i set aside his order and restore the order of the magistrate, awarding maintenance at the rate of rs. 75/- per month to the petitioner. accordingly, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1981 (HC)

The Hamali Co-operative Labour Contract Society Ltd. Vs. K. Venkatiah ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-19-1981

Reported in : AIR1981AP391

..... be, the subordinate judge did not express these facts in so many words. but even a cursory reading of the order of the learned subordinate judge makes his satisfaction too patent to be ignored. the learned subordinate judge has clearly observed in paragraph 8 as follows:'r-1 it registered society. it has an obligation to discharge liability of plaintiff if .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //