Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 26 results (0.048 seconds)

Oct 18 1982 (HC)

Kunala Subbarao and ors. Vs. P. Nagaratnayamma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-18-1982

Reported in : AIR1982AP443

..... reasons for such an order. we are, therefore, unable to accept that submission. but in any case for the purpose of clause 15 of the letters patent, it should be held that unless a matter is adjudicated upon on issues between the parties, no judgment can ensue. no order made by court merely ..... ordering of notice can at times amount to a rejection of the petitioner's prayer for relief. it may be. but what clause 15 of letters patent makes appealable is only positive adjudication but not refusal to grant immediate aid. but sri suryanarayana murthy's argument is slightly guilty of exaggeration. so long ..... cannot be described as a judgment. it is a step in aid and such a step in aid isn't a judgment within the meaning of letters patent. in view of the above, we are unable to entertain this appeal.3. but sri suryanarayanamurthy argued that it is the substance of an order that ..... the appellants at full length and we are fully satisfied that this particular appeal is wholly incompetent and cannot be maintained under clause 15 of the letters patent. it should be emphasised that the institution of an appeal is a statutory creation and is unknown to that grand old dame, common law. this ..... learned single judge should therefore be answered only on the basis of the meaning the word 'judgment' bears in clause 15 of the letters patent. clause 15 of the letters patent provides for a right of appeal only against a 'judgment' passed by a learned single judge. if ordering notice within that meaning then .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1982 (HC)

Nagavarapu Krishna Prasad and anr. Vs. Andhra Bank Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-19-1982

Reported in : [1983]53CompCas73(AP)

..... for importing something else, however general the words are.' 17. he observed that the real object of the company was to manufacture a substitute for coffee in germany under a patent, valid according to law. the words were general, but that was the thing for which the people subscribed their money. he, therefore, held that there was a case for ..... 20 ch d 169 (ca) the memorandum of association of a company stated that it was formed for working a german patent which had been or would be granted for manufacturing coffee from dates, and also for obtaining other patents for improvements and extensions of the said inventions or any modifications thereof or incidental thereto; and to acquire or purchase any other ..... sold coffee made from dates without a patent. it was held that the substratum of the company had failed, and it was impossible to carry ..... inventions for similar purposes. the intended german patent was never granted, but the company purchased a swedish patent, and also established works in hamburg, where they made and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 1982 (HC)

Lalmohan Srivastava Vs. Ravi Co-operative Housing Society Limited at B ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-07-1982

Reported in : AIR1982AP295

ramachandra rao, j.1. this letters patent appeal is sought to be preferred against an interlocutory order in a revision petition filed under s. 115, c.p.c clause 15 of the letter patent clearly prohibits a letters patent jurisdiction appeal being preferred against an order made in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction. it follows that, when a letter patent appeal is not maintainable against any order in the revision petition itself, no appeal lies under clause 15 of the letters patent against any interlocutory order in a revision petition. an interlocutory order made in a revision petition may with in the meaning of clause 15; but, inasmuch as the said order is made in exercise of the revision al jurisdiction, no letters patent appeal lies under clause 15 of the letters patent.2. sri b.g. paropkari, the learned counsel for the appellant, relies upon a decision of the supreme court in shah babulal khimji v. jayaben, air 1981 sc 1786; but we do not find anything in that decision in support of the contention of the learned counsel. the letters patent appeal is not maintainable and the memorandum of appeal is rejected.appeal dismissed.

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 1982 (HC)

T. Pandurangam Vs. General Manager, South Central Railway

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-12-1982

Reported in : (1983)IILLJ265AP

..... in baldwin & francis ltd. v. patent appeal tribunal (1959) a. c. 563; (1959) all e.r. 33. the respondents' counsel fairly stated and, rightly in our opinion, that these aspects cannot be said to have been ..... the ruling of the andhra pradesh high court in sivaramabrahman v. satyanarayanna : air1967ap181 . 21. omitting thus to consider the amended school register and the decree would clearly amount to a patent error of law apparent on the face of the 'record' as held by us above and also to an act in excess of jurisdiction in the words of lord denning ..... it ..... this was clear non-application of mind on the part of the central government to a very material circumstances .... the order of the central government therefore, suffers from a patent error, and it must be quashed.' in the light of the aforesaid legal position, we shall consider the validity of the impugned order passed by the respondents. we will first ..... not a decision 'according to law' especially when the error appears from document properly before the court or by legitimate inferences therefrom. (per lord denning in baldwin & francis limited v. patent appeal tribunal (1959) a.c. 663; (1959) 2 all e.r. 433 (h.l.) rex v. northumbuland compensation appeal tribunal, (1959) all e.r. 122; (1952) 1 k.b. 338 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 1982 (HC)

Brooke Bond India Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-24-1982

Reported in : 1984(3)ECC107; 1984(15)ELT32(AP)

..... , the separation of salt from earth or other substance so as to produce alimentary salt, and the excavation or removal of natural saline deposits or efflorescence; (iii) in relation to patent or proprietary medicines as defined in item no. 14-e of the first schedule and in relation to cosmetics and toilet preparations as defined in item no. 14-f of ..... clause, as already stated above, gives out details as to the process incidental or ancillary to the completion of a manufactured product in relation to the goods like tobacco, salt, patent or proprietary medicines as defined in item no. 14-e of the first schedule, in relation to cosmetics and toilet preparations as defined in item no. 14-f of that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1982 (HC)

S. Radhakrishna Murthy Vs. K. Narayanadas and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-18-1982

Reported in : AIR1982AP384

..... filed by the respondent was vacated. aggrieved against a civil miscellaneous appeal was preferred in this court and learned single judge of this court dismissed the same. hence, this letters patent appeal.2. the case of respondent 1 in the main is that he never executed ex. a-2 agreement and that the appellant has contracted the same on stamp papers ..... juxtaposition to respondent 1. we are equally emphatic that no irreparable injury will be sustained by the appellant if the interlocutory injunction is refused.21. in the result, the letters patent appeal is dismissed. the parties will bear their respective costs in the l. p. a. no leave.appeal dismissed. ..... seetharama reddy, j.1. this interlocutory letters patent appeal by the plaintiff-appellant arises out of an order of the learned judge of this court, dismissing the appeal in a.a.o. no. 597 of 1981 preferred against .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1982 (HC)

Mohammed Jameel Ahmed Ansari Vs. Ishrath Sajeeda and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-05-1982

Reported in : AIR1983AP106

..... petitioner-appellant. that would completely transplant him from the present surroundings and it may tell upon his mental health. the order of the single judge is assiled in the letters patent appeal.4. the learned counsel for the appellant argued that the father is the legal guardian and is not held 'unfit' so long, it is not so held, the father .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1982 (HC)

The Gram Panchayat and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-28-1982

Reported in : AIR1982AP315

..... on the passing thereof, and conferees power to make any appointment, to make grant, or issue any instrument, that is to say, any order in council, order, warrant, scheme, letters patent, rules, regulations or bye-laws to give notices to prescribe forms, or to do any other thing for the purpose of the act that power may, unless the contrary intention ..... relevant act. as pointed out by tucker lord justice in the passage cited above, the section extends to a comprehensive enumeration of matters; order in council, order, warrant, scheme, letters patent, rules regulaations or bye-laws. clearly many of these matters are matters requiring to be dealt with under the act when in operation, in order that it may operate effectively ..... on the passing thereof, and confers power to make any appointment, to make grant or issue any instruction, that is to say, any order in council, order, warrant, scheme letters patent rules, regulations or bye laws, to give notice to prescribe forms or to do any other thing for the purposes of the act, that power may unless the contrary intention .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 1982 (HC)

G. Chennaiah and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-31-1982

Reported in : AIR1983AP34

..... of s. 32 of the act. on those findings, the learned judge dismissed the writ petitions.11. against the said judgment, appeals were preferred under cl. 15 of the letters patent and the appeals were heard and disposed of by madhava reddy, j. (as he then was ) and narasinga rao j. in c. narasaiah v. tahsildar, mahabubabad, (1978) 2 aplj (high .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 1982 (HC)

Rahmatullah Khaleem and ors. Vs. the Andhra Pradesh, Wakf Board and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-25-1982

Reported in : AIR1983AP116

..... bad in law and destructive of democratic process. the learned single judge dismissed the writ petition holding that there is no error apparent on the face of the record or patent illegality in the consitution of the committee.3. assailing the validity of the said order, the petitioner preferred this appeal. two others who were elected on 3-5-1982 to ..... to nominate one more member to be in conformity with bye-law 8. we cannot agree. the election of 7 members instead of 6 members on 9-5-1982 is patently illegal being contrary to bye-law 8. when once the election is held to be illegal the proceedings nominating 4 members cannot be upheld. bye-law 8 says that out .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //