Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1983 Page 1 of about 20 results (0.052 seconds)

Jun 10 1983 (HC)

Coromandel Fertilizers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-10-1983

Reported in : (1984)39CTR(AP)210; [1984]148ITR546(AP)

..... five years by mutual consent and the assessee was entitled notwithstanding the termination of the agreement, to use for the purpose of their business all the information, technical know-how, patents, copy-rights and drawings transferred by j & s to the assessee or which might come into the possession of the assessee during the sub-sistence of the agreement. the ..... was called upon to consider the claim of the assessee to deduction of the consideration paid by it to bakelite company ltd., an english company, in respect of the patents owned by the english company in india for the production of copper-clad laminates, and exclusive non-assignable license to manufacture laminates in accordance with the processes covered by the ..... court held that these contributions made by the indian subsidiary, which was the assessee, were not contributions relating to patents and other processes, research and technical assistance and was not allowable under s. 10(2)(xii) as expenditure laid out or expended on scientific research but was allowable as business ..... and sale of medical and pharmaceutical preparations, which had entered into an agreement with the principal swiss co., for a specific period for use of processes, formulae, scientific data, patents and trade marks on contribution to the foreign company a percentage of sale price of products towards technical services, research work, cost of material used in research and royalties, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 1983 (HC)

Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Addl. Labour Court ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-07-1983

Reported in : (1984)ILLJ128AP

..... to discharge his normal duties and that constituted reasonable cause for not imposing the penalty or removal on him. the labour court, in the circumstance of the case, committed a patent error in holding that the penalty of removal was shockingly disproportionate or that it was illegal, as the 2nd respondent failed to perform the primary and basic duty cast on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 1983 (HC)

Chittoor Co-operative Town Bank Ltd. Vs. T. Krishnaiah Chetty and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-20-1983

Reported in : AIR1983AP259

..... provisions of substantive law. the writ petitions are filed under art. 226 of the constitution and the writ appeals are filed under clause 15 of the letters patent. it is to govern these proceedings that the writ proceedings rules have been framed. this was necessitated for the reason that in the appellate side rules, ..... order lies and in fact the ist respondent bank has itself preferred on appeal and this writ appeal is governed by cl. 15. of the letters patent is not in dispute the only question is whether cross-objections are also entertainable. merly because in the rules governing the writ proceedings ther is no specific ..... of a specific provision in the rules. these cross-objections cannot be entertained.7. the writ appeal is filed under clause 15 of of the letters patent and rules 17, 18 and 19 of the writ proceedings rules provide for the form in which the writ appeal may be filed. that a writ ..... how and when the writ appeal also is filed under clause 15 of the letters patent. the provisions of order 41, rule 22 c.p.c. could be excluded there is no rule are silent as to whether cross-objections could ..... these provisions admittedly apply to all appeals filed under cl. 15 of the letters patent. so much so against the judgment rendered by the learned single judge upon a first appeal when a letters patent appeal is filed in that letters patent appeal, cross-objections could be filed by the respondent therein. we fail to see .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 1983 (HC)

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Raja Medical Stores

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-22-1983

Reported in : [1983]53STC428(AP)

..... , whether ginned or unginned, baled, pressed or otherwise, but excluding cotton water, or within item 95 of the first schedule to the madras general sales tax act which reads : 'drugs, patent or proprietary medicines as defined in section 3 of the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 (central act xxiii of 1940), or medicinal mixtures or compounds, the components of which have ..... pradesh general sales tax act, or should it be treated as general goods. entry 37 reads as follows : 'drugs and medicines (whether at the point of four paise in the patent or proprietory), as first sale in rupee.' defined in section 3 of the the state. drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 (central act 23 of 1940). 2. the tribunal has held .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 1983 (HC)

D.K.V. Prasada Rao and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-08-1983

Reported in : AIR1984AP75

..... of the licensee seeking admission into the theatres to witness pictures to be exhibited in the theatres. the loss of profit is no ground to declare the rule unreasonble. though patent injustice may not be encouraged, a reasonable return on investment or a reasonable rate of profit is not the sine qua non of the validity of an action taken in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 1983 (HC)

Superintendent of Post Offices, Khammam and anr. Vs. Kalluri Vasayya

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-22-1983

Reported in : (1984)IILLJ140AP

chennakesav reddi, j.1. a controversy of considerable interest and public importance is aroused by this writ appeal preferred under clause 15 of the letters patent against the order of our learned brother jeevan reddy, j. it is (a) whether right to employment is a fundamental right guaranteed under art. 16 of the constitution and (b) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 1983 (HC)

Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Durgaram Prasad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-08-1983

Reported in : AIR1984AP14

..... the old provision is restricted to the specific applications and situations enumerated therein. in so far as the proceedings under special enactment the halting applicability of former section 5 is patent and the present section 5 has an universal application to the proceedings irrespective of the source, nature or otherwise. the present s. 5 applies to all proceedings by its own ..... the provisions of the limitation act or the entirety of the provisions of the limitation act or any provisions of the limitation act is incorporated in the statute. it is patent from the perusal of s. 37 of the arbitration act that a reference to the provisions of the limitation act, 1908 has been made and it cannot be interpreted that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 1983 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh Vs. Pabbati Shankaraiah and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-22-1983

Reported in : (1984)38CTR(AP)37; [1984]145ITR702(AP)

..... the members of the family, then the minors who were the parties to the document would become full-fledged partners in the so-called sub-partnership, a situation which is patently illegal, because no minor can legally enter into a partnership agreement. in fact, the relevant portion of the document does not speak of any partnership at all. in fact, it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 1983 (HC)

Kamana Vanmarju Vs. the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporatio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-15-1983

Reported in : AIR1983AP427

..... something which the provision is not intended to bear. further there is absolutely no semblance of clarification or reference to omission in the statement of objects and reasons it is patent from notes to clauses that the relief of compensation for damages to property was introduced for the first time by amendment and it was not in contemplation anterior to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 30 1983 (HC)

Ch. Atchaiah Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-30-1983

Reported in : (1984)42CTR(AP)127; [1985]156ITR78(AP)

..... to find primarily evidently facts and then apply the legal principles involved in the expression 'adventure in the nature of trade' used by s. 2, sub-s. (13). it is patent that the clause 'in the nature of trade' postulates the existence of certain elements in the adventure which in law would invest it with the character of trade or business .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //