Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1987 Page 1 of about 11 results (0.222 seconds)

Apr 15 1987 (HC)

Amruthappa Vs. Abdul Rasool

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-15-1987

Reported in : AIR1988AP215

..... orders under o. 43, r. 1, c.p.c. of single judges. but, the supreme court has incidentally dealt with the maintainability of letters patent appeals against first appellate orders of single judges under o. 43, r. 1, c.p. c. and clearly overrules later judgments of the allahabad high ..... objections are over-ruled.' 16. similarly anantakrishna ayyar, j, observed (at page 576) follows: - 'the question whether an appeal lies under cl. 15, letters patent, against the judgment of a single judge of the high court based on an appeal preferred to the high court under o. 43, c.p.c. (corresponding ..... (1903) 13 mad lj 497 the practice of this court has been uniformly to hold that the civil procedure code does not control the section of the letters patent, and that principle has been applied in other decisions of this court, for example, dhanaraju v. bala kishadass motilai, air 1929 mad 641 (fb). ..... ) as follow-, : 'secondly, mr. ramabhadra ayyar contended that under order 43, rule 1, the order of pandalai, j. was final and no letters patent appeal lay against his order. this question was the subject of consideration by several judges of this court under the old code and though at one time a ..... rendered by the single judge in first appeals - be they appeals against decrees or orders but provided they are 'judgments' as understood under the letters patent - an appeal would lie to a division bench. however, if the learned single judge rendered the judgments either in regular second appeals against the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1987 (HC)

T. Nandagopal Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-24-1987

Reported in : AIR1988AP199

..... reddy, j.(on difference of opinion between raghuvir, j. and waghray j. agreeing with raghuvir, j.) 1. this matter has been referred to me under clause 36 of the letters patent on a difference of opinion arising between two members of the division bench who heard the writ petition. raghuvir', j. was inclined to allow the writ petition directing the state ..... desist from going into the said question. 25. the matter may now be posted before the division bench for appropriate orders, as contemplated by cl. 36 of t he letters patent. final order of division bench:26. in view of the opinion of b.p.j.r., j. were shall be a direction as contained in the order passed by a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 1987 (HC)

A.S. Sarma and ors. Vs. Union of India

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-19-1987

Reported in : (1987)67CTR(AP)131; [1989]175ITR254(AP)

..... genuine representation and having an over-view knowledge of the affairs of the assessee are authorised to represent without reference to any specialised proficiency in taxation or otherwise. it is patent that all those categories are lined up on an equal footing under section 288(2) for the purpose of representation of the case of the assessee and this equal eye .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 1987 (HC)

Barium Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-06-1987

Reported in : AIR1987AP267

..... and if an erroneous view was taken of the principles of 'first come first serve' embodied in that section and in the mineral concession rules it was not such a patent error which would call for interference of the high court.' 48. the question in the main that falls for determination is whether under sub-sec. (2) of sec. 11 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 1987 (HC)

Owners of Ship Tiong Yung Vs. Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-01-1987

Reported in : AIR1988AP331

..... navigation company limited (hereinafter referred to as the appellant) claiming to be the owner of the arrested ship tiong yung have filed this appeal under cl. 15 of the letters patent against the judgment and decree of the learned single judge in cs.no. 1/1975.asuitfiledon the original side of this court. invoking the- admiralty jurisdiction. 2. messrs shaw wallace ..... reported in kamalakar mahdev v. s. s. navigation co. 'ltd. : air1961bom186 and the decision of calcutta high court in jayaswal shipping co. v. s. s. leelavati', : air1954cal415 . by the letters patent issued underthe charterof 1823. supreme courts were established at bombay, calcutta and other' places in the country. the concluding portion of cl. 53 of the letters ..... patent of bombay (which is similar to the others) extracted from the aforesaid bombay decision reads as follows:'...................the cognizance where of doth belong to the jurisdiction of the admiralty, as ..... 1862. the admiralty jurisdiction previously exercised by the supreme court was to be exercised by the high courts. the letters patent of 1862 was superseded by the letters patent of 1865 and under- the new letters patent also. the admiralty jurisdiction of the high courts remained the same, that is. those of the admiralty courts in england. the jurisdiction of the admiralty courts .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 1987 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Andhra Pradesh Riding Club

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-03-1987

Reported in : [1987]168ITR393(AP)

..... adventure in the nature of business involving risk-taking also. the members alone have the actual benefit of the club. profit is the main consideration while the public benefit is patently incidental and ancillary to the main object of making profit. the income-tax officer, therefore, held that the assessee is not entitled to exemption and assessed it to tax accordingly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 1987 (HC)

Guntupalli Rama Subbayya Vs. Guntupalli Rajamma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-29-1987

Reported in : AIR1988AP226

..... consisting of five judges. it was argued that the amendment was retrospective, otherwise, the result would be that cl. 15 of the amended letters patent would remain a dead letters for many years to come. the special bench repelled that contention in the following words. the result is regrettable, because ..... school boards, i cannot say that litigants may not continue to have a third appeal unless it otherwise appears that this construction of the letters patent is not reasonably possible. far be it from me to distinguish between such forms of excess or to divide such claims to toleration'. 30. ..... s case (1905 ac 369) (supra), felt bound to answer the question whether it is any necessary part of the intendment of the amended letters patent that they should operate upon appeals arising out of suits instituted before the date of amendment when such appeals were heard after that date, in negative. ..... the vested right in him. the special bench consisting of five judges of the calcutta high court held that the amendment made by the letters patent, was made with no other view than to obviate unreasonable, or unreasonably prolonged litigation but in view of the decision of the privy council ..... proportions in every high court. the learned single judge while dismissing the second appeal declined to grant leave under cl. 15 of the amended letters patent. however, the appellant filed the appeal and argued that under the unamended rule he was entitled to maintain the appeal and that the amendment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 1987 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. K. Venkateswar Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-23-1987

Reported in : (1987)67CTR(AP)136; [1987]169ITR330(AP)

..... that on the date when the income-tax officer exercised the jurisdiction under section 154, the matter was not free from argument or debate. it cannot be said that a patent and self-evident mistake occurred when the income-tax officer completed the assessment treating the payment as an advance tax payment and granting interest under section 214 of the act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 1987 (HC)

South India Textiles and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-10-1987

Reported in : AIR1989AP55

..... conditions as may be prescribed by the central government use, or continue to use, for the purpose of any trade, business, calling or profession, or in the title of any patent, or any colourable imitation thereof without the previous permission of the central government or of such officer of government as may be authorised in this behalf by the central government .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1987 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Three Aces

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-19-1987

Reported in : [1989]176ITR160(AP)

..... made for the said assessment year on the firm 'three aces'. he was of the further opinion that the new partnership deed executed on january 4, 1972, suffered from a patent illegality inasmuch as the 5th partner, sashi rani, was admitted as a partner with effect from november 22, 1971, when she was still a minor (as stated above, she attained .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //