Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1988 Page 1 of about 10 results (0.036 seconds)

Apr 18 1988 (HC)

Ghantasala Seshamma and Others Vs. Gollapalli Rajaratnam and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-1988

Reported in : AIR1990AP19

..... reading of the judgment does not leave any doubt. however as contended by the learned counsel for the appellants, in certain passages there are indications that an appeal under letters patent act lies. but these observations have to be understood in the background of the question that was considered by their lordships viz., whether an appeal lie against an order by ..... and whether sec. 104(2), cpc was a bar to the maintainability of a letters patent appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent?2. in amruthappa v. abdul rasool, : air1988ap215 , jagannadha rao, j. considered this question and he referred the judgments of various high courts including the bombay and ..... orderjayachandra reddy, j.1. a very important question is again canvassed before us in this l.p.a, before admission. the question is: whether a letters patent appeallay to a division bench against an appellate order of a single judge in an appeal under order 43, rule l, c.p.c. read with section 104(1). cpc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 02 1988 (HC)

Dhronamrajti Satyanarayana Vs. N.T. Rama Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-02-1988

Reported in : AIR1988AP62

..... respectively in the two theatres and they were in turn certified by the commissioner of police. as the two theatre belong to the family members of the first respondent, the patent infirmities relating to the period of limitation, the non-disclosure of the full particulars relating to the days when the shows were claimed to have been not exhibited and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 1988 (HC)

Zipper Association of India Vs. Government of India

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-19-1988

Reported in : 1992(40)ECC136; 1989(44)ELT18(AP)

..... state government merely because it feels another policy decision would have been fairer or wiser or more scientific or logical. the court can interfere only if the policy decision is patently arbitrary, discriminatory or mala fide. 10. the ratio to be drawn from a study of the above cases is that the courts will not hesitate to interfere in the policy ..... decision taken in the economic field if they are patently illegal or arbitrary or have been taken in a mala fide manner but a certain amount of judicial restraint is called for in dealing with these matters of a technical .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1988 (HC)

Srigopal and ors. Vs. Special Commercial Tax Officer (Evasion), Warang ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-28-1988

Reported in : [1991]81STC57(AP)

..... not held to be maintainable against her. it is open to the plaintiffs to purpose the suit as against defendant no. 1. 16. we see no merit in this letters patent appeal and it is accordingly dismissed. c.r.p. no. 4410 of 1981 : the civil revision petition is filed against the order dismissing the review petition filed by the plaintiffs ..... is now disposed of holding that the suit is not maintainable, this civil revision petition has necessarily to be dismissed. 18. in the result, both the letters patent appeal and the civil revision petition are dismissed with costs. 19. it is represented that appeals are pending against the assessment orders. the appellate authority shall consider whether the view ..... the learned single judge holding that the suit is not maintainable, the suit was dismissed. the plaintiffs filed an application to review that order on the ground that an letters patent appeal is pending. the same was dismissed, against which the present civil revision petition is filed. in view of the fact that the letters ..... amareswari, j. 1. this appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent arises out of the order of our learned brother raghuvir, j., in c.m.a. no. 327 of 1979. 2. the four plaintiffs filed a suit for a declaration that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 1988 (HC)

Indian Bank Vs. Datta Venkata Chinna Krishna Raju

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-28-1988

Reported in : [1989]65CompCas451(AP)

..... formed in pursuance of an act of parliament of the united kingdom or due to any corporation formed in pursuance of any special indian law or royal charter or letters patent' are declared to be exempted from the operation of the general provisions contained in the act. insertion of such a provision was made by the ultimate political authority which the ..... to the loans advances by 'any corporation formed in pursuance of an act of parliament of the united kingdom or of any special indian law or royal charter or letters patent' was not applicable to the indian bank constituted by act 5 of 1970. the decision in krishna murthy's case, air 1983 ap 347, held that those words 'special indian .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 1988 (HC)

Rayavarapu Palakondaiah Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer, Cuddapah and O ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-09-1988

Reported in : 1999(3)ALD612; 1999(3)ALT128

..... the appeal the revenue commissioner after hearing respondent no.4/appellant and the present writ petitioner, held that the assignment made by the tahsildar in favour of writ petitioner was patently erroneous in view of the provisions of 1977 act and remitted back the matter for having a fresh look by referring to the provisions of 1977 act. this order was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 1988 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Srinivasa Sugar Factory

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-12-1988

Reported in : (1988)74CTR(AP)104; [1988]174ITR178(AP)

..... , the net loss, including depreciation allowance once allocated to the partners shall be absorbed in their individual assessments only as per sections 32(2) and 75(2) of the act. patently, the context involved before the supreme court was in the matter of distinguishing the absorption of losses between the assessees other than registered firms and registered firms. the supreme court ..... explained the decision of the allahabad high court in k. t. wire products v. union of india : [1973]92itr459(all) by saying that the material observations made therein make it patent that in the case before the allahabad high court, the question of the distinct character of the allowance of unabsorbed depreciation as compared to the other business losses was not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 1988 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. C. Subramanyam

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-25-1988

Reported in : [1989]175ITR48(AP)

..... authorise the assessments of the wife to be made including her share income in the hands of her husband. it was nest urged that in any event there was no patent mistake apparent from the assessee's record and, consequently, the provisions of section 154 of the act are inapplicable. the income-tax officer rejected both the contentions. the matter was ..... open to the income-tax officer to look into the records of the firm, the husband and the wife and come to a conclusion regarding the existence of any error patent on the record falling within the terms of section 154 of the act. if only the income-tax officer indicated, by a perusal of the partnership deed, that the firm .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1988 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. M. Lakshmaiah and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-10-1988

Reported in : (1988)74CTR(AP)5; [1988]174ITR4(AP)

..... excess that can be disregarded. the wealth-tax officer felt into the error of thinking that any amount provided by way of provision for taxation should be excluded. this is patently wrong. then, there is a sum of rs. 2,64,082 added to the resultant figure. we do not know how this was arrived at and what it meant. we .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 1988 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Segu Harnath

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-15-1988

Reported in : [1988]171ITR318(AP)

..... the same time, the income-tax officer revised the income-tax assessment for the year 1978-79 under section 154 of the income-tax act as if there was a patent and self evident error. in an order passed under section 154 of the act, the income-tax, officer likewise included the share income of the minor daughter in the total .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //