Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1989 Page 1 of about 17 results (0.035 seconds)

Sep 15 1989 (HC)

Y.V. Anjaneyulu Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-15-1989

Reported in : (1990)89CTR(AP)43; [1990]182ITR242(AP)

..... be perused by the court in considering whether or not a writ of certiorari should be granted on this aspect, lord denning, in his judgment in baldwin and francis v. patents appeal tribunal [1959] 2 all er 433 , observed (at page 444) : 'what is the 'record' for this purpose it is not confined to the formal record of the proceedings such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 1989 (HC)

Kishanlal Soni and Others Vs. Chandrabala Devi

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-28-1989

Reported in : AIR1990AP72

..... of agreement, up to the date of deposit of the said amount. the rate of interest shall be 12% per annum. three months for deposit of interest amount. 10. letters patent appeal is, accordingly,dismissed, subject to the direction regardingpayment of interest in the preceding paragraph. the payment of the said interestamount shall be in addition to the balance ofconsideration of ..... is entitled to specific performance of the agreement. on appeal, the learned single judge has affirmed the findings of the trial judge and dismissed the appeal.6. in this letters patent appeal, it is contended by sri m.s.k. sastry, learned counsel for the appellants, that the plaintiff has failed to adduce any evidence in proof of her contention that ..... orderjeevan reddv, j.1. this letters patent appeal is preferred by the defendants in a suit for specific performance. therespondent-plaintiff instituted the suit on the basis of an agreement of sale dt. 27-10-1977 executed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 1989 (HC)

B.K. Adarsh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-06-1989

Reported in : AIR1990AP100

..... whether appeals to prominent interest according to the contemporary standards of the reasonable average man; whether the motion picture is not saved by any redeeming social values; whether it is patently offensive because it is opposed to contemporary standards and whether the story, incident or the dialogue likely to impair the moral standards of the public by extenuating vice or crime .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 1989 (HC)

Pragathi Enterprises and anr. Vs. Sri Balaji Trading Company Rep. by I ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-11-1989

Reported in : 1991(2)ALT462

..... this court in m. srinivas v. jawaharlal nehru technological university, hyderabad, (1990 (3) alt 3 (sn)) there can be no doubt that a letters patent appeal lies against an order refusing to review the judgment. but the question that still arises is whether the said principle can be applied in respect of orders ..... unable to agree with the submissions of the learned counsel that a letters patent appeal lies against an order refusing to review the judgment. the decisions of the supreme court as well as of this court have been considered in ..... 2. learned counsel for the appellants submits that an order refusing to review the judgment is a 'judgment' within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent as held by the supreme court in state of u.p. v. vijay anand, : [1962]45itr414(sc) he also submits that the power of review ..... passed in revision applications against which there is no letters patent appeal. 4. it is true that clause 15 of the letters patent specifically states that a letters patent appeal does not lie against an order passed in revision but does not specifically refer to an ..... in (sic) way concerned with the power of revision and that therefore even if a l(sic)ters patent appeal does not lie against an order in the main civil revision petition, a letters patent appeal lies against an order refusing to review the order in the civil revision petition. 3. we are .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 1989 (HC)

A. Sanyasi Rao and anr. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-07-1989

Reported in : (1989)77CTR(AP)40; [1989]178ITR31(AP)

..... reading down was applied to ataxing statute in cst v. radhakishan : [1979]118itr534(sc) . we a recongnise at the same time that this rule cannot be employed to sustain a patently void provision. on this aspect, we a may as well refer to the words 'in the assessment made under this act' sub-section (4) of section 206c. these words show .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 12 1989 (HC)

Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd. and ors. Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Electr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-12-1989

Reported in : 1991(2)ALT290

..... the various exigencies that may be existing in a particular set of circumstances. it would, therefore, be only fair and proper to deduce the principle that unless there is something patently wrong in the fixation of the uniform tariff by the board or there is something which shows that a clear error has been committed by the board while exercising the ..... rates applicable to category-i during that period. in so far as the request of the petitioner to opt for category-i from 15-7-87 is concerned, it is patently clear that this option is not available in view of b. ps. no. 671 dated 10-6-1987 which creates a specific category viz., h.t. category-iii for power .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 1989 (HC)

R.N. Jalan Vs. Deccan Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-23-1989

Reported in : [1992]75CompCas417(AP)

..... other rival companies is apparently made only as an attempt to defeat these applications. there is no material to show that any such secret processes were secured or for which patent is applied for. this very unit was being managed by the board consisting of all groups and it is pointed out by counsel for the petitioners that petitioner no. 3 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 1989 (HC)

M/S. Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. Vs. M/S. Tarapore and Co. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-17-1989

Reported in : AIR1990AP82

..... point out that a judge sitting alone is not a court subordinate to high court, but performs a function directed to be performed by the high court (cl. 36 letters patent) and thus no decision of a single judge can be revised under s. 115 of the code.'21. from the above discussion it follows that against an order of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 1989 (HC)

K.K.R. Nair Vs. Mohan Das and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-25-1989

Reported in : 1990CriLJ1641

..... inferior forum. though all the judges of the high court are of equal status, for easy facility of disposal, appellate side rules are made and clause 15 of the letters patent provides right of appeal against the order of a learned single judge to the division bench. the judgment of the division bench either confirming or reversing, after hearing the parties ..... . thereby the rule itself provides a clue that despite the doctrine of merger and carrying the proceedings in appeal to the appellate forums either under clause 15 of the letters patent to the division bench or under art. 136 of the constitution, etc. to the supreme court, and the decision rendered thereon by the division bench of two judges or full ..... and action was not taken as directed in the writ petition. accordingly it was held that it was within limitation. (12) it is seen that clause 15 of the letter patent accords right of appeal to the aggrieved person against the order, writ or direction issued by a learned single judge to a division bench of two judges. it is also .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 13 1989 (HC)

B.V. Rao Vs. Chittivalasa Jute Mills and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-13-1989

Reported in : (1990)ILLJ513AP

..... the case'. 18. now, fortunately for the appellant, that civil suit filed by him is still pending in this court in the form of a letters patent appeal. the said appeal has been preferred by the employer, though it has not yet been numbered. we sent for the records in the l.p. ..... writ petition on another question, viz., that the reference not having been made by the appropriate government, was incompetent. against the said decision, a letters patent appeal was filed, and the only question considered in appeal was which is the appropriate government evidently, the appellant cited this decision to rely upon the opinion ..... their own costs in all the three matters. questioning the said judgment the employee has preferred these two writ appeals, while the employer has preferred a letters patent appeal. 6. the appellant, who argued these appeals in person with commendable ability and sobriety, urged that the learned single judge was not right in ..... . in fact, the judgment of the learned single judge also disposes of a.s. no. 2611 of 1986, which too was filed the employer. a letters patent appeal has been preferred against it. 2. the appellant, sri b. v. rao, who argued these appeals in person, was appointed as a mechanical maintenance overseer ..... of the case, we permit him to withdraw the suit. in as much as the suit itself has been withdrawn, the letters patent appeal preferred by the employer has become unnecessary, and is disposed of as such. there shall be no order as to costs in the letters .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //