Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1990 Page 1 of about 18 results (0.039 seconds)

Feb 28 1990 (HC)

B.V. Subrahmanyam Vs. B. Seetha

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-28-1990

Reported in : II(1991)DMC247

..... divorce from her. as the respondent is an educated lady and was qualified in library science, she joined the bharathiya vidya bhavan and earning something instead of depending on her patents. simply because she is working at hyderabad, it cannot be said that she has no intention of joining her husband. both parties were interviewed by us and she expressed her .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1990 (HC)

M. Srinivas Vs. Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-23-1990

Reported in : 1991(3)ALT1

..... chemicals, : air1986guj156 wherein the said courts understood the supreme court judgment in shah babulal khimji's case (2 supra) as holding that no letters patent appeal is maintainable against appellate orders of learned single judges while disposing of appeals under section 104(1) read with order 43, rule 1, c. ..... the proper way of reconciling the several paragraphs in the judgment is to hold that the supreme court accepted that clause 15 of the letter patent gave an independent jurisdiction conferring right of appeal against 'judgments' of learned single judges of the high court whether passed in original jurisdiction or ..... several extracts from cases which are approved by the supreme court, which do support the opposite contention that section 104(2) did not bar letters patent appeals but merely barred further appeals under the code. these latter passages and extracts to which we shall presently refer, read along with the ..... the said application was rejected by the learned single judge of the high court. the plaintiff preferred an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent and at that stage, the respondent raised an objection as to its main-taxability. the learned single judge held that, in as much as ..... for review is appealable. on a parity of reasoning therefore, an order dismissing an application for review would also be appealable under the letters patent being a judgment though it is not made appealable under order 43 rule 1.of course, the order refusing to review must be a ' .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 23 1990 (HC)

Pieco Electronics and Electricals Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Com ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-23-1990

Reported in : [1991]81STC49(AP)

..... subjected to levy of tax was rs. 2,50,609.62, taxable at 3.5 per cent. in computing that portion of turnover and levying tax the respondent committed a patent mistake and computed the tax as rs. 87,713.15 instead of rs. 8,771.31. it is stated that a copy of the assessment order was served on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 25 1990 (HC)

Kommineni Krishna Rao Vs. Kommineni Babjee Rao and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-25-1990

Reported in : [1992]75CompCas121(AP)

..... the judgment of the trial court. in fact, the learned judges during the course of the judgment in para 38 referred to the judgment which is impugned in this letters patent appeal and stated as follows (at page 96) : 'at this juncture, it is necessary for us to refer to a decision rendered by one of us (ramachandra raju j.), (who .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 06 1990 (HC)

Kumaraswamy Vs. Smt. Gangu Bai

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-06-1990

Reported in : 1991(1)ALT420

..... was dismissed. the learned single judge by his judgment dated 13-9-1988 has affirmed these findings and dismissed the appeal. it is against this judgment that the present letters patent appeal is preferred by the plaintiff.2. the following facts need be stated : late adellu was the husband of sayakka. as sayakka did not bear any children late adellu married ..... the plaintiff.10. in view of our findings on point nos. 2 and 3 the plaintiff cannot be declared as the owner and possessor of the suit properties. the letters patent appeal therefore fails and is dismissed. there shall, however, be no order as to costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 1990 (HC)

Kota Varaprasada Rao and Another Vs. Kota China Venkaiah and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-17-1990

Reported in : AIR1992AP1

orderbhaskar rao, j.1. in this letters patent appeal the important questions that arise for our decision are:(i) whether a destitute widowed daughter has a right of maintenance against her brothers after the death of her father .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 1990 (HC)

Sharifa Bee and ors. Vs. General Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Road Tr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-29-1990

Reported in : 1991ACJ1093

..... the cross-objectors to take out notices afresh to such persons against whom cross-objections were filed.8. for the aforesaid reasons, we hold that this letters patent appeal is maintainable and we issue notice before admission. the appellants are permitted to amend the cause-title in this appeal also wherein a similar endorsement has been ..... of the appeal and the cross-objections. in that view of the matter the driver did not suffer any prejudice before the learned single judge. in this letters patent appeal it is open to the claimants to show the driver as the 3rd respondent and in view of our decision regarding order 41, rule 14 (4) ..... cross-objections) was not a necessary party. the contention is that it is not open to the claimants to implead the driver as a respondent in this letters patent appeal.5. it is to be noticed that order 41, rule 14 (1) of the code of civil procedure had been amended in madras in 1927 by ..... -objections do not merit any consideration. there was no discussion.3. in so far as the learned judge dismissed the cross-objections, the claimants have preferred this letters patent appeal.4. when the matter came before us for admission, the learned standing counsel for a.p.s.r.t.c, mr. k. harinath, has taken an ..... made and the learned counsel for the appellants has agreed to take out notice to the driver. we accordingly hold that the letters patent appeal is maintainable and direct the appellants to take out notices to the 3rd respondent driver in this appeal. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1990 (HC)

Aeronautics Employees Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. Vs. the Govt. of And ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-1990

Reported in : AIR1990AP331

..... communicated government to the management of the h.a.l. says that the request was rejected 'as no land is available for allotment'. the reason given is factually incorrect and patently misleading. the land is still available, as can be seen from the latest order of the government passed in no. 441 dated 11-5-1989 allotting the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 1990 (HC)

A. Sundaramma and ors. Vs. the Government of India, Represented by Min ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-19-1990

Reported in : 1991(1)ALT403

..... by an indirect interpretative process so as to include matters not coverred by it. the resort to the intention of law-makers is permissible only in cases where there is patent ambiguity or where the words employed expressly lead to absurd situations. neither is the case now. section 217(2)(e) does not keep alive any schemes referrable to section 68 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 12 1990 (HC)

Central Bank of India Vs. Popuri Sarangaiah and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-12-1990

Reported in : 1991(1)ALT455; [1992]75CompCas493(AP)

..... , or any debt due to any corporation formed in pursuance of an act of parliament of the united kingdom or of any special indian law or royal charter or letters patent.' 18. in bank of india v. vijay transport : [1988]1scr961 , the supreme court observed as follows [page 434 of 63 comp cas] : 'accordingly, we hold that the banking companies act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //