Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 26 results (0.055 seconds)

Jun 16 1992 (HC)

Sarada Bai and Others Vs. Smt. Shakuntala Bai and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-16-1992

Reported in : AIR1993AP20; 1992(2)ALT660

..... ):'it is also well established that it is only when an order of a tribunal is violative of the fundamental basic principles of justice and fair play or where a patent or flagrant error in procedure of law has crept in or where theorder passed results in manifest injustice, that a court can justifiably intervene under art. 227 of the constitution .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 1992 (HC)

S.B. Dwarkanath and the Registrar, Osmania University Vs. R. Dilip Kum ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-29-1992

Reported in : 1993(3)ALT24

..... marks could not be sustained. the court also held that -'it was wrong of the high court to allow a compromise of this kind to be effected when it was patently obvious that three candidates had not attended the viva-voce test at all and there was nothing before the high court for comparing the remaining thirteen candidates with those who .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1992 (HC)

M. Dayanand Reddy Vs. A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-21-1992

Reported in : 1992(1)ALT566

..... cannot be equated with the original hearing of the case, and the finality of the judgment delivered by the court will not be reconsidered except where a glaring omission or patent mistake or like grave error has crept in earlier by judicial fallability.'krishna iyer, j., speaking for the bench in that decision held that:'a review in counsel's mentation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 1992 (HC)

Bangari Rajam Vs. Dasari Sattamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-30-1992

Reported in : 1994(1)ALT643

..... driver and the claimants filed appeals a.a.o.nos. 1240 of 1987 and 47 of 1988 respectively. the learned single judge dismissed both the appeals. hence these two letters patent appeals have seen filed by the driver and the claimants.5. the main question that arises for consideration in these appeals is, whether the singareni collieries company ltd., is vicariously .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 1992 (HC)

P. Ramaiah and anr. Vs. M. Mallesham and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-17-1992

Reported in : 1993(1)ALT325

..... . 777/88 in this court. having found that the compensation awarded to the claimants was quite reasonable, the learned single judge dismissed the appeal. aggrieved by that order, this letters patent appeal is preferred.3. it is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants that the multiplier of 17.5 applied by the tribunal was not correct and as held .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1992 (HC)

M. Ram Mohan Rao Vs. the A.P. State Road Transport Corporation and anr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-21-1992

Reported in : 1992(2)ALT402

..... . rao, j., observed:'.... by merely labelling a lapse as substantial misdemeanour the disciplinary authority cannot impose the maximum punishment of removal or dismissal; such an exercise of power would be patently unreasonable and perverse.. a late comer to his office cannot be sacked; nor can a traffic offender be sentenced to death whatever be the facade of nomenclature assigned to the ..... circumstances of this case, the conclusion of the government is based on no evidence whatever. it is a conclusion which is perverse and, therefore, suffers from such an obvious and patent error on the face of the record that the high court would be justified in quashing it. in dealing with writ petitions filed by the public servants who have been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 1992 (HC)

S.K. Khuddus Vs. Managing Director, A.P. State Warehousing Corporation ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-14-1992

Reported in : 1992(2)ALT127; (1993)ILLJ13AP

..... enquiry against the petitioner and issued a charge memo to the petitioner and while the enquiry was in process the 1st respondent passed the impugned order. by this it is patently evident that prejudice has been caused to the petitioner herein by denial to him of a particular right of enquiry.16. in om prakash goel v. him. pradesh tourism devehpment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 1992 (HC)

Pally Ramulu and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by Secr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-04-1992

Reported in : 1993(1)ALT158

..... of the scheme of the act and should, at least for the present, be restricted and limited to ensuring that the issue to which he is granting consent is not, patently and to his knowledge, so manifestly impracticable or financially risky as to amount to a fraud on the public.'9. the above observations were followed in a subsequent decision of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 1992 (HC)

D. Ramana Raju Vs. Yendapalli Gowramma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-11-1992

Reported in : 1992(3)ALT577

..... the evidence of one side or the other without due consideration of the salient facts established and contrary to the conclusion to which the outstanding facts point, arbitrarily or on patently inadequate grounds. in short, the judgment ought to show that the judge has been led to a particular conclusion by the force of the facts and not that he has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 1992 (HC)

Kurra Dasaratha Ramaiah and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-04-1992

Reported in : 1992(1)ALT269; 1992CriLJ3485

..... . there may be many other factors which may hinder or even bar the actual physical production of the accused. in the somewhat turbulent times through which we are passing a patent one is where a curfew is imposed and the accused person cannot possibly be carried to the venue of the magistrate's court without infracting the law. examples of this .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //