Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1994 Page 1 of about 32 results (0.042 seconds)

Aug 12 1994 (HC)

A. Hemamalini Vs. A. Pankajanabham and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-12-1994

Reported in : 1994(3)ALT30; I(1995)DMC258

..... company of the appellant. the parents of the appellant took one or the other pretext and did not send the appellant to the first respondent. on 22.4.1985 the patents of the appellant met the first respondent and informed the latter that the appellant was missing from the house from the previous night and they also disclosed to the first .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 1994 (HC)

S. Smmaiah and ors. Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board and ors ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-04-1994

Reported in : 1994CriLJ3830

..... the order dismissing an application filed for punishing the contemnor for contempt of court is a 'judgment' within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent (madras). 16. in this connection, we may refer to the judgment of the supreme court reported in union of india v. mohindra supply co., ..... act' to the contemnor. when once the competent legislature restricted the right of appeal, that restriction applies or prevails over clause 15 of the letters patent (madras), as the said clause is subject to the provisions prescribing right of appeal provided under the act. restrictions and limitations with regard to ..... for punishing the contemnor under the contempt of courts act, is dismissed, can have recourse for filing an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent (madras), even though no appeal lies under s. 19(1) of 'the act'. 13. a similar contention fell for consideration in the said ..... bench against the order of a learned single judge dismissing the application filed for punishing the respondents, an appeal lies under clause 15 of letters patent as the judgment affected the rights of the appellants and, therefore, it is a 'judgment' within the meaning of the said clause. in support ..... of the petitioners as helpers is based on principles of recruitment ........' 4. this appeal is sought to be filed under clause 15 of the letters patent act by the appellants questioning the dismissal of contempt petition. office raised an objection that no appeal lies under s. 19(1) of the contempt .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 1994 (HC)

P. Raj Kumar Vs. N. Krishna

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-11-1994

Reported in : 1994(3)ALT597

..... appellate judge not examining these questions, inasmuch as from the materials the order of eviction, should be totally set aside. this court is not persuaded by either of the pleas. patently, the learned appellate judge has totally failed in dealing with the matters in accordance with law much less satisfactorily. there is also the evidence on record to come to a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 1994 (HC)

G. Padma Vs. Dr. Bavineni Vijaya Lakshmi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-21-1994

Reported in : AIR1995AP63; 1994(3)ALT318

..... .7. we must record that there was a strain on the part of the learned counsel for the appellant to show that clause 15 of the letters. patent overrides the code. this submission is of no avail at all for deciding the question of maintainability of a writ appeal as against the decision in a petition ..... court. however, the review petition was heard by one of the two learned judges. 'when an appeal was sought to be preferred under clause 15 of the letters patent, it was held by the bench of the high court of calcutta that no such appeal would lie. the learned judges of the bench in achyutham v. annapur ..... bench is dealt with by one of the two judges on the ground that the other judge was not available, an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent is not maintainable. while doing so, the learned judges of the bench of this court referred to and relied on the pronouncement of a bench of the ..... is being done by one of the two judges available. we do not think we could be more expatiate than what we have expressed as above. this implication is patent to our mind.5. however, the endeavour of mr. t. lakshminarayana, learned counsel for the appellant, is to mainatin that as per the terms of clause 15 ..... or any of them shall hear the application, and no other judge or judges of the court shall hear the same.'3. the implications of the rule are patent and unambiguous. if the judge or judges or any one of the judges, who made the original verdict, a review of which is sought for, continues or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 1994 (HC)

Samineni Venkateswarlu and Another Vs. Nagubandi Venkata Narasiah (Die ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-24-1994

Reported in : AIR1994AP220; 1994(1)ALT626

..... in the letters patent appeal, we see no merits in the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the cross-objectors. hence, the cross-objections are also dismissed. no costs.24. the learned counsel ..... are findings based on facts andalso on consideration of the entire evidence on record. we see no reason to differ with the said findings of the fact in this letters patent appeal.22. in the result, the appeal fails and is accordingly dismissed. no costs.23. we have heard the counsel for the cross-objectors. in view of the reasoning given .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1994 (HC)

Valluri Jaganmohini Seetharama Lakshmi and Another Vs. Kopparthi Ramac ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-25-1994

Reported in : AIR1994AP284; 1994(1)ALT217

..... are set aside in so far as items 1 and 2 of suit schedule properties are concerned and are affirmed in so far as item no. 3 thereof. the letters patent appeal is allowed in part. each party shall bear their own costs.15. appeal allowed. ..... b. subhashan reddy, j.1. this letters patent appeal raises two important questions of law as to(1) whether making a provision for pocket expenses amounts to maintenance capable of enlarging into a fulfledged right under section 14( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1994 (HC)

Sheriff Iqbal HussaIn Ahmad Vs. Kota Venkata Subbamma and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-25-1994

Reported in : AIR1994AP164; 1994(1)ALT229

..... of any compensation or damages to their respective defendants; and (c) the plaintiffs shall be entitled for costs throughout viz. in the suits, first appeals, cross-objections and these letters patent appeals. 11. l.p. as, are allowed as indicated above with costs.12. appeals allowed. ..... 1. at issue in these two letters patent appeals is:'when a specific relief for possession is sought for by a civil action in common law remedy, can a discretion be exercised by the court to grant a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 07 1994 (HC)

Uddagiri Chalama Raju and anr. Vs. Uddagiri Subba Rao (Died) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-07-1994

Reported in : 1994(2)ALT522

..... plaintiffs filed an appeal. a learned single judge of this court after considering the material on record confirmed the judgment of the lower court. against that judgment, this present letters patent appeal is filed.5. sri c. poornaiah, the learned counsel for the appellants contended that there is no custom of jesta bhaga and allotment of any share towards jesta bhaga ..... the account was settled between the parties. thus, we see no force in this contention of the learned counsel for *the appellants.24. we see no ground in the letters patent appeal and the same is dismissed accordingly. no costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 1994 (HC)

E. Durvasulu Naidu Vs. E. Rangaiah Naidu and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-24-1994

Reported in : 1994(3)ALT102

syed shah mohammed quadri, j.1. this letters patent appeal arises out of the final decree proceedings taken in a partition suit. the plaintiff in o.s.no. 2 of 1975 is the appellant in this l.p.a. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 04 1994 (HC)

The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission of India Vs. Dr. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-04-1994

Reported in : 1994(3)ALT653

..... therefore, of the view that the order passed by the learned single judge is a 'judgment' within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent.21. the next aspect which is of foremost importance is whether the view expressed by the learned single judge regarding the powers of high court under ..... especially at paragraph (9) of the judgment.19. the scope and ambit of the expression 'judgment' for the purpose of clause 15 of the letters patent has been succinctly laid down by the supreme court in the leading case of sham babulal khimji v. jayaben, air 1981 sc 1786. the following observations ..... article 226 of the constitution of india are such that could be regarded as a 'judgment' within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent. the various observations extracted above would make it fairly clear that the learned judge was of the definite view that a constitutional court exercising jurisdiction under ..... not been disposed of finally. it is also true that it is only against a 'judgment' that an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent can be filed. but, we are of the view that the views expressed by the learned single judge regarding the maintainability of the writ petition ..... to these arguments the learned counsel for the first respondent- writ petitioner contended that the appeal itself is not maintainable under clause 15 of the letters patent, that article 329(b) does not come in the way of the writ petitioner inasmuch as he is seeking to enforce the fundamental right guaranteed .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //