Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 67 results (0.080 seconds)

Jul 14 1995 (HC)

Kannegolla Ramchandra Rao and Company and anr. Vs. Smt. Kannegolla San ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-14-1995

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT120

..... the entire controversy revolves round the said issue. though we are not supposed to go through the evidence as the scope under clause 15 of letters patent appeal act is very much limited, with a view to see that justice is not only done but it is seemed to be done, we have ..... there is no illegality or material irregularity in the judgment of the learned single judge for this court to interfere under clause 15 of the letters patent appeal act, as the conclusion reached by the learned single judge is nothing but clear appreciation of evidence by placing reliance on the very same decision ..... referred to the same decisions which were cited before the trial judge and drew the distinction in between the same. aggrieved by the same, the present letters patent appeal is filed. 4. sri p. ramachandra reddy, learned senior advocate appearing for the appellants, attacked the judgment and decree of the learned single judge ..... decreed the suit for a sum of rs. 27,452/- with interest at 12% from april 15, 1977 till realisation. assailing the same, the present letters patent appeal is preferred by defendants 1 and 2. 3. the brief facts of the case are that - smt. kannegolla santha kumari, kannegolla ramachandra rao, k.r ..... recovery of a sum of rs. 31,300/- being the principal and interest tnereon due to the plaintiff-1st respondent, are the appellants in this letters patents appeal. 2. the trial court dismissed the plaintiff's suit. on an appeal filed by the plaintiff in a.s. no.1244 of 1980, the learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1995 (HC)

Peddapudi Seshagiri Rao Vs. Andhra University, Rep. by Its Registrar a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-08-1995

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT820

..... are already examined by the original and appellate authority created for the said purpose, but also to avail the right of appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent of the court. any attempt to use the court's plenary power in such matters is nothing but making the legislative sanctions for special tribunals meaningless as proceedings ..... and the forum of appeal but two more forums - one under article 226 of the constitution of india and the another under clause 15 of the letters patent of the court. it appears to us reasonable thus to hold that a party seeking to invoke the court's extraordinary and plenary jurisdiction under article 226 of ..... under article 227 of the constitution, but not under article 226 thereof. it is obvious that in such a case the appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent shall not be maintainable. 10. it appears to us an abuse of the process of the court, if appeals are filed against interlocutory orders in the writ petitions ..... say that in no case appeal shall lie against an interlocutory order, but it is well settled that right of appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent is available only against a final order and against such interlocutory orders which are in the nature of a final order and in some matters and in exceptional ..... it is not against an order of a moment which this court should quash in exercise of its power under clause 15 of the letters patent. 11. for the reasons aforementioned, we find no merit in the appeal. the appeal is dismissed.

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 1995 (HC)

Yarlagadda Venkakka Choudary (Dead) and anr. Vs. Daggubati Lakshminara ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-31-1995

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT877

..... 65 of the limitation act, 1963. the period of limitation for such a suit is 12years when the possession of the defendants became adverse to the plaintiffs. patently neither rajamma nor plaintiffs were in possession of the suit lands within 12 years next before the suit. strictly speaking, it ran to commence from the year ..... a-6 the partition deed between defendant no. 1 and his sons dated 27-7-1957 which came into existence within a short time after ex.a-3 patently omitted to include suit lands for the purpose of partition although they are said to be the joint family properties. (3) the cordial relationship between the parties at ..... law by both leal and illegal methods. it may stretch for sufficient time both before and after the legislation. ex.a-3 is dated 12-4-1957. patently it has come into existence within the close proximity of such a land legislation, the learned sub judge has rightly pointed out that even the plaintiffs 1 ..... execute gift deed in respect of the lands already presented to her, so that disputes my not arise in future with his sons. such an expression is patently absent in the plaint wherein it is stated that rajamma felt that it well be better in the interest of all concerned to have a registered instrument ..... 3 if that gift is true and at any rate can never be an acknowledgement of a gift, since it was never made by any of them. patently, ex. a-3 is a unilateral document. rajamma is not a party to the document. p.w.i has admitted that neither he nor rajamma was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 1995 (HC)

V. Gopala Krishna Murthy Vs. the Registrar (Administration) High Court ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-02-1995

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT833

..... supra) the supreme court has observed as follows: 'a review of a judgment is a serious step and reluctant resort to it is proper only where a glaring omission or patent mistake or like grave error has crept in earlier by judicial fallibility. a mere repetition through different counsel of old and overruled arguments, a second trip over ineffectually covered ground ..... suspension pending enquiry is not a punishment and that normally the high court will not interfere with such an order under article 226 of the constitution unless the order is patently illegal or without jurisdiction or is vitiated by mala fides. in the impugned order valid and cogent reasons are given for placing the petitioner under suspension. it cannot be said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 1995 (HC)

Government of Andhra Pradesh and anr. Vs. V. Satyam Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-08-1995

Reported in : 1996(2)ARBLR453(AP)

..... court, clause 59 precludes claim no. 6 being raised and allowed by the arbitrator and whether the arbitrator can be said to have committed an error of jurisdiction or a patent error of law in granting extra rate based on standard schedule of rates in force during the relevant year i.e., 1985-86. before dealing with the question of applicability .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1995 (HC)

T.N. Seshan, Chief Election Commissioner and anr. Vs. All India Anna D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-08-1995

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT135

..... , any of them, shall dwell or carry on business within such limits' and, in my view, i cannot read the provisions of the amended letters patent conferring jurisdiction upon this court in case where one or more of the several defendants reside within jurisdiction. the point is free from authority except the case ..... excluded by section 120 cpc and, if we have the power, it must be found within the four corners of section 12 of the amended letters patent. the words are 'or if the defendant at the time of the commencement of the suit shall dwell or carry on business within such limits'. the ..... v. seethalakshmi, 1992(1) law weekly 277. the said judgment of the madras court has noticed that the madras court's special jurisdiction under its letters patent has been left free from some of the provisions of the code of civil procedure, including sections 16, 17 and 20, by section 120 of the code ..... mat the court shall have jurisdiction to proceed. 5. original jurisdiction as to suits of the high court of judicature at madras is prescribed by the letters patent, clause 12, which reads as follows: 'original jurisdiction as to suits:-and we do further ordain that said high court of judicature at madras, in ..... m.g. ramachandran) were taken by the madras court on its file, after applications seeking leave to sue were granted under clause 12 of the letters patent of the court. in the suit, however, filed by all india anna dravida munnetra kazhagam for the alleged defamation of late sri c.n. annadurai was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1995 (HC)

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. Mukku ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-20-1995

Reported in : 1996(2)ALT446

..... -court to the high court and from the high court to the federal court under the federal court (enlargement of jurisdiction) act 1947 read with clause 39 of the letters patent (mad) and section 109 and 110 of the code of civil procedure provided the conditions thereof were satisfied, unless that right had been taken away expressly or by necessary intendment ..... learned single judge refusing to grant permission to further appeal. then, the question arose whether the appellant were having a right to file an appeal. clause 15 of the letters patent of the high court was amended on 14-1-1928 which changed the earlier law. it was contended there in that the new clause cannot be applied to this case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1995 (HC)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mukku Bullemma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-20-1995

Reported in : 1996ACJ1213

..... -court to the high court and from the high court to the federal court under the federal court (enlargement of jurisdiction) act, 1947, read with clause 39 of the letters patent (mad) and sections 109 and 110 of the code of civil procedure provided the conditions thereof were satisfied, unless that right had been taken away expressly or by necessary intendment ..... learned single judge refusing to grant permission to further appeal. then, the question arose whether the appellants were having a right to file an appeal. clause 15 of the letters patent of the high court as amended on 14.1.1928 which changed the earlier law. it was contended therein that the new clause cannot be applied to this case, because .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 1995 (HC)

B. Naga Reddy (Died) and ors. Vs. Mattam Parvataiah (Died) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-18-1995

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT325

..... these aspects had been dealt with by the learned single judge and as no new facets of the arguments already urged before the learned judge are put forth, the letters patent appeal must be dismissed. 10. section 38 of the tenancy act concerns with the rights of protected tenants to purchase the land-holder's interest. the protected tenant, by subsection ..... allowing the appeal in part declaring the plaintiffs as protected tenants, directed that the possession of the suit land should be restored to them. aggrieved by that the present letters patent appeal was brought by the defendants. 8. sri sivarama sastry, the learned counsel for the appellants, argues that in consequence of the abolition of the inams under the abolition act ..... m.n. rao, j. 1. this letters patent appeal is from the judgment of a learned single judge of this court in a.s. no. 769 of 1978 (see: m. parvathaiah v. b.n. reddy, 1987 (2) alt .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1995 (HC)

Gajuwaka Gram Panchayat, Rep. by the Executive Officer Vs. Medisetti V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-1995

Reported in : 1995(2)ALT113

..... of a photostat copy only. no steps were taken even before the learned single judge or before us to file such decision of the tahsildar as additional evidence. the letters patent appeal itself has been filed five years back. it will be travesty of justice to allow the appellant to re- open the proceedings at this late stage. the suit itself .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //