Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2000 Page 2 of about 51 results (0.040 seconds)

Oct 16 2000 (HC)

S. Bharat Kumar and Others Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-16-2000

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD217; 2000(6)ALT1

..... , investments, book debts, claims, receivables, deposits, capital work in progress, deferred costs, advances paid, accrued incomes and pre-paid expenses, benefits, licences, permits, consents, rights of way, authorities, registrations, liberties, patents, trademarks, design, copyrights and other intellectual property rights, privileges, liberties, easements,advantages, benefits and approvals, contract-deeds, schemes, bonds, guarantees, agreements, insurance, and other instruments and interests of whatsoever nature ..... court speaking through sudershan reddy, j in v.b.c. ferro alloy's case (supra) in the following words:'..... the tariff fixation can be declared unconstitutional only if it is patently arbitrary, irrational, discriminatory or demonstrably irrelevant. the court inexercise of its judicial review jurisdiction ought not to normally interfere so long as the exercise of the power to fix the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 29 2000 (HC)

Guntur Tobaccos Ltd., Guntur Vs. Apseb and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-29-2000

Reported in : 2001(1)ALD473; 2001(1)ALT719

..... was decided by the learned single judge of this court on 4th june, 1987. the learned single judge dismissed the appeal. hence this letters patent appeal.2. the question which needs to be considered in this letters patent appeal in the light of the pleadings and the evidence would be, whether the agreementsentered into between the parties are void or valid, if ..... licensee of purchasing the properly cannot be enforced because of the statutory obligation of a.p. electricity supply undertakings (acquisition) act, 1954.11. for these reasons, we dismiss the letters patent appeal. no costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 2000 (HC)

Lalitha Sankar Narayan and Others Vs. Rohini

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-06-2000

Reported in : 2000(3)ALD759; 2000(3)ALT672

..... order, the respondent herein filed cma no.1511 of 1992 which was allowed by the learned single judge on 31-12-1999 against which the appellants herein filed this letters patent appeal with the leave of the court. 1st appellant is the wife, appellants 2 and 3 are the sons and the 4th appellant is the father of late shankar narayan ..... orderv. eswaraiah, j.1. heard both the counsel appearing for the appellants as well as the respondent at the admission stage. this letters patent appeal is filed with leave of the court against the judgment and decree in cma no.1511 of 1992. the application filed by the respondent herein under section 276 of ..... the dismissal of the cma no.1511 of 1992, op no.839 of 1992 shall be disposed of as expeditiously as possible on its own merits.9. accordingly, the letters patent appeal is allowed with costs. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 2000 (HC)

Vbc Ferro Alloys Limited Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-15-2000

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD626; 2000(5)ALT340

..... the electrical development is a matter for decision exclusively within the province of the board. such matters do not ordinarily attract the power of judicial review except when it is patent that there is hostile discrimination against a class of consumers. it is not permissible for the courts to interfere with such tariff fixation when there is found to be a ..... entitled to make pragmatic adjustments, which may be required in the particular circumstances. the tariff fixation can be declared unconstitutional only if it is patently arbitrary, irrational, discriminatory or demonstrably irrelevant. the court in exercise of itsjudicial review jurisdiction ought not to normally interfere so long as the exercise of the power to fix the ..... not attracted in case of price fixation. the mechanics of price fixation/tariff fixation has necessarily to be left to the judgment of the authority concerned and unless it is patent that there is hostile discrimination against a class of consumers, the processual basis of price fixation has to be accepted in the generality of cases as valid. the board is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2000 (HC)

State of A.P. and Another Vs. Crag MartIn Distillery Pvt. Ltd., Goa an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-11-2000

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD213; 2000(5)ALT34

..... -10-1998 passed the following:'we are of the view that the impugned direction is something which docs not legitimately fall within the scope of clauses 15 of the letters patent. we, therefore, affirm the order of the learned single judge so far as it directs the government to pass appropriate order after giving an opportunity of making personal representation to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 2000 (HC)

Associated Cement Companies Ltd., Sec'bad Vs. Govt. of A.P. and anothe ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-08-2000

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD685; 2000(5)ALT634

..... already noted, the sheet anchor of petitioner's argument is the decision of the supreme court in ayurveda pharmacy's case (supra). the facts in that case were that the patented or proprietary preparations belonging to different systems of medicine were subjected to tax at the rate of 7% as per the first schedule to the tamil nadu general sales tax .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2000 (HC)

Andhra Pradesh Civil Liberties Committee and anr. Vs. Station House Of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-05-2000

Reported in : 2001(1)ALT201

..... people who were watching from the fly-over. the other allegations are also are not correct. the statement that one person 'succumbed' to bullet injury and was later hospitalized, is patently untrue. there is no question of a dead person being hospitalized. the averments in para-9 that the police firing was unwarranted and unnecessary and was resorted to only to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2000 (HC)

Andhra Pradesh Civil Liberties Committee and Etc. Vs. Station House Of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-05-2000

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2362

..... people who were watching from the fly-over. the other allegations are also are not correct. the statement that one person 'succumbed' to bullet injury and was later hospitalized is patently untrue. there is no question of a dead person being hospitalized. the averments in para-9 that the police firing was unwarranted and unnecessary and was resorted to only to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2000 (HC)

Soham Modi and Another Vs. Special Court Under A.P. Land Grabbing (Pro ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-03-2000

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD468; 2000(2)ALT316

..... said error of law is apparent on the face of the record. it may also be that in some cases, the impugned error of law may not be obvious or patent on the face of the record as such and the court may need an argument to discover the said error, but there can be no doubt that what can be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 2000 (HC)

S.J. Narayana Jana Deo Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-16-2000

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD781; 2000(3)ALT87

..... of seniority subject to fitness as claimed by the petitioner in one of his representations or it may mean concessions if any, given to a scheduled tribe officer. on a patent misunderstanding of the judgment of this court in writ petition no.5306 of 1981, the government passed an order in g.o. ms. no.1583, dated 18-7-1988, that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //