Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 100 results (0.051 seconds)

Jul 03 2001 (HC)

Sheetal Refineries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer (intellige ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-03-2001

Reported in : 2001(4)ALT372; [2002]125STC86(AP)

..... of orissa13, state of maharashtra vs. himmathbhai narbheram rao14 are authorities to state that the term 'property' includes not only real and personal property but also incorporeal rights such as patents, copyrights, leases, choses in action and every other thing of exchangeable value which a person may have, `profit a prendre'. in jilubhai nanbhai khachar vs. state of gujarat15 , the supreme .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 28 2001 (HC)

Mr. M. Suryanarayana Vs. Stiles India Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Di ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-28-2001

Reported in : [2003]116CompCas448(AP)

..... single judge by his order dated 12.8.1997 dismissed c.p. no. 71 of 1996 at the admission stage itself. hence this appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent act and sec. 483 of the act. 4. it is stated, the question whether 'arrears of salary' or 'salary due' to an employee by the respondent-company, can be treated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2001 (HC)

H. Kondal Reddy Vs. Central Bank of India, Hyderabad and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-22-2001

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD280; 2002(1)ALT135; [2002(93)FLR245]

..... after referring to various authorities summarised the law as under:the position which emerges from the above discussion is that under clause 15 of the letters patent of the chartered high courts, from the judgment (within the meaning of that term as used in that clause) of a single judge of ..... provided, 39. clause 15 providing of appeals from a learned single judge to a division court is ipsisima verba with the similar provision in letters patent of calcutta and letters patent of madras high courts. in national sewing thread company limited v. james chadwick and bros. limited, : [1953]4scr1028 and south asia industries ..... court of judicature, madras, is in relation to its exercise of jurisdiction is governed and regulated by the same court procedures and practice as well as its letters patent. (see m. subbarayudu v. state of a.p., : air1955ap87 (fb), and t. veeraiah v. t. nagalah, : air1959ap547 (fb).38. the jurisdiction ..... is not always a power to review its own order. there could be cases where without exercising power of review the order may be recalled.letters patent and jurisdiction under article 22637. the british parliament by indian high courts act, 1861 (24 and 25 vict, c104) enacted a legislation for ..... effective administration of justice.(2) a writ appeal is the continuation of the writ petition. merely because it is an appeal under the letters patent of the court, it does not change its character from being a writ proceeding to an ordinary civil proceeding.(3) the hon'ble the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 2001 (HC)

Pulusam Krishna Murthy Vs. T. Sujan Kumar and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-23-2001

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD423; 2002(2)ALT77

..... 5(1) of v schedule. by a brief order dated 25-8-1989, the then chairman of the tribunal quashed g.o. ms. no.275 holding: it is therefore, quite patent from the said go that the governor, in the purported exercise of powers under paragraph 5(1) of v schedule to the constitution makes an order by notificalion that a ..... connection to the object sought to be achieved. article 14 does not insist upon classification, which is scientifically perfect or logically complete. a classification would be justified unless it is patently arbitrary. if there is equality and uniformity in each group, the law will not become discriminatory, though due to some fortuitous circumstance arising out of peculiar situation some included in ..... , : air1963sc649 , the apex court speaking through gajendragadkar, j., struck down the government order describing it as a fraud on the constitution and the action of the executive was characterized as 'patently and plainly outside the limits of the constitutional authority conferred on the state.'96. we are not oblivious of the fact that in union of india v. madhav, : (1997)illj977sc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 2001 (HC)

T. Ramachander Rao Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-08-2001

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD634

..... . : (1997)7scc592 , the apex court has clearly held that the state's policy decision to extend the protection to a class of persons or for a particular period is unless patently arbitrary, no interference therewith is called for at the hands of the court'.18. in the light of the above, we are of the opinion that, this court, in exercise .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 2001 (HC)

Baddam Prabhavathi Vs. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-02-2001

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD655; 2001(6)ALT584

..... the party in sufferance is a respondent to the us or proceedings cannot confer any further sanctity or authority and validity which it is shown and found to obviously and patently lack 68. for the foregoing reasons we are of the opinion that the orders of the state government in g.o.ms.no. 88, dated 25-7-2001 are valid .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 2001 (HC)

U. Govinda Rao and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-23-2001

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD347; 2002(1)ALT713

..... parties. if the management for good reasons have classified the posts into two categories with different pay scales, the courts generally must accept unless it is demonstrated that it is patently erroneous either in law or on facts.94. it is one thing to say that having regard to devi prasad and k.s. muralidhar that weightage rule is not arbitrary .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2001 (HC)

K. Harinatha Reddy and Others Vs. B. Rama Rao and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-20-2001

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD116; 2001(2)ALT237

..... proceedings cannot be equated with the original hearing of the case and the finality of the judgment rendered bythe court will not be reconsidered except where a glaring omission or patent mistake or like grave error has crept in the order by judicial fallibility. when on appreciation the court took a view, which was the only possible view warranted in view .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2001 (HC)

Ushodaya Enterprises Limited Vs. T.V. Venugopal and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-15-2001

Reported in : 2001(4)ALD723

ordermotilal b. naik, j 1. these two letters patent appeals arise out of a common judgment in ccca nos.178 and 180 of 2000 dated 28-12-2000 rendered by a learned single judge of this court.2. for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2001 (HC)

Andhra Sales Tax Practitioners and Consultants Association Vs. Anantha ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-27-2001

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD370; 2002(2)ALT250

..... genuine representation and having an over-view knowledge of the affairs of the assessee are authorized to represent without reference to any specialized proficiency in taxation or otherwise. it is patent that all those categories are lined up on an equal footing under section 288 for the purpose of representation of the case of the assessee and this equal eye . should .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //