Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2001 Page 5 of about 100 results (0.069 seconds)

Jun 29 2001 (HC)

Ch. Rama Rao and anr. Vs. State of A.P., Industries and Commerce Depar ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-29-2001

Reported in : 2002(1)ALT255

..... section 28 of the said act.18. the question as to whether an appeal shall be maintainable against an interim order passed by the tribunal under clause 15 of letters patent came up for consideration before a division bench of calcutta high court in ramendra nath v. gouri shankar, 1991 (1) cal.l.j. 125 wherein it was observed:the remedy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 2001 (HC)

E. Arvind Rao and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-19-2001

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD(Cri)844; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)553; 2002CriLJ4487

..... allegations in the complaint do not make out any case against the accused nor do they disclose the ingredients of an offence alleged against the accused or the allegations are patently absurd and inherently improbable so that no prudent person can ever reach to such a conclusion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused? in fact the apex .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 2001 (HC)

Badrunnisa Begum Vs. Mohamooda Begum

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-16-2001

Reported in : 2001(3)ALD11; 2001(3)ALT243

..... v. karnal distillery co., ltd., : [1964]1scr270 , had occasion to observe that a single judge deciding a first appeal may be a court immediately below the court hearing a letters patent appeal but it is not a court subordinate to the high court.' even otherwise, we are not going into the total evidence and are considering a pure legal question as ..... limitations on the power of the court imposed by sections 100 and 101 of the code of civil procedure cannot be made applicable to an appellate court hearing a letters patent appeal from the judgment of a single judge of that high court in a first appeal from the judgment and decree of the court subordinate to the high court for ..... the original. therefore, this judgment will also not help the respondent.7. the other argument made by the learned counsel for the respondent was that, appreciation of evidence in letters patent appeal was restricted in nature therefore this court would not be justified in going through the evidence as an appellate court. he refers to a judgment of division bench of ..... to the superintendence of the high court, the only question is whether the power of a division bench hearing a letters patent appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent of patna high court or its analogous provisions in the letters patent of other high courts is limited only to a question of law under section 100 of the code of civil procedure .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 2001 (HC)

Srinivas Kumar Mowle Vs. Chandrasekhar Mowle and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-2001

Reported in : 2001(3)ALD670; 2001(4)ALT169

..... the pendency of the proceedings died. this application was allowed by the learned single judge and as a matter of fact in the first appeal itself and in this letters patent appeal the legal representatives of defendant no.5 are before the court. therefore, in our view the objection raised by the learned counsel cannot be accepted and the plaintiff cannot ..... into equal shares. against the preliminary decree an appeal was taken which was rejected by the learned single judge. hence this letters patent appeal.4. four contentions were raised by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant in this letters patent appeal, theyare :--1. whether non-joinder of a daughter who is admittedly a co-share is fatal to the suit? 2 ..... arises out of the judgment by learned single judge in appeal ccca no.3 of 1989. this letters patent appeal has been filed by appellant defendant no.2 in the suit. thesame appellant had filed the appeal which was decided by the learned single judge.2. the plaintiff had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2001 (HC)

imtiyaz HussaIn Vs. T. Durgamala and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-20-2001

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD375; 2001(5)ALT653

..... . rao, the bench while admitting the appeal referred the matter to the full bench observing:the question that arises for consideration in this appeal is under what circumstances a letters patent would lie - either against an order refusing to review the original order or the original order of the learned single judge. the said questionbeing an important question of law and ..... s.b. sinha, cj 1. the question that arises for consideration in this appeal is under what circumstances letters patent would lie - either against an order refusing to review the original order of the original order of the learned single judge.2. the writ appeal arises out of the orders .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 2001 (HC)

R.V. Bhupal Prasad Vs. Saleha Begum Alias Shehensha Begum and 17 ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-03-2001

Reported in : 2001(5)ALT770

..... the 1st respondent, and granted a decree for mesne profits from 1.1.1984 till date of delivery of possession to be determined on a separate application. hence this letters patent appeal by the 1st defendant.4. the points for consideration in this appeal are:(1) whether the 1st respondent is entitled to seek eviction of the appellant and (2) to ..... any assertion that he became a tenant 'holding over' because of the 1st respondent filing a petition seeking a direction to the appellant to deposit 'rent'. 14. in the letters patent appeal the applicant added a new string to the bow of attack of the confirming judgment that because of ex.b.4 notice issued by her 1st respondent waived the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 2001 (HC)

N. Ramanuja and ors. Vs. P. Satyanarayana and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-17-2001

Reported in : 2002(1)ALT189

..... rendered. as indicated hereinbefore, by reason of the impugned notice, no lis has been adjudicated upon nor any finality has been attained in the matter. clause 15 of the letters patent, therefore, cannot be said to have any application at all.11. in t.v. chowdary v. riata industrial corporation, : 1998(3)ald11 , a final order was passed in contempt proceeding ..... by the learned single judge to show cause as to why they should not be committed to prison is a judgment within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent. in view of the decisions of the apex court referred to above, it is not possible to be construed so. by reason of issuance of such notice, the learned single ..... , a notice directing the appellants to show cause as to why they shall not be committed to prison is a judgment within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent. section 19 of the act reads thus:(1) an appeal shall lie as of right from any order or decision of high court in the exercise of its jurisdiction to ..... , learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants would submit that an appeal is maintainable both under section 19 of the act as also clause 15 of the letters patent of this court. according to the learned counsel, it was incumbent upon the learned single judge to issue a notice at the first instance as to why a proceeding under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2001 (HC)

A. Satya Phaneendra Vs. S.H.O. Kodad (Ps), Nalgonda District and Other ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-12-2001

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD264; 2001(2)ALT141

..... conditions as may be prescribed by the central government, use or continue to use for the purpose of any trade, business, calling or profession, or in the title of any patent, or in any trade mark or design, any name or emblem specified in the schedule or any colourable imitation thereof without the previous permission of the central government or such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 2001 (HC)

K. Raghuram Babu Vs. Director General of Railway Protection Force, New ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-07-2001

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD18; 2001(5)ALT543

..... ultra vires articles 14 and 16 of the constitution of india, but having regard to the decision of the division bench refused to interfere in the matter. on a letters patent appeal preferred there-against, this matter has been referred to a full bench by a division bench of this court by an order dated 6-12-1999. 6. sri s .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 2001 (HC)

Hyderabad District Co-operative Central Bank Vs. Co-operative Tribunal ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-07-2001

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD359

..... so. such was not the case in challa sanyasi naidu (supra).18. for the aforementioned reasons, it cannot be said that the tribunal has committed an error, much less a patent error, in setting aside the surcharge order and remitting the matter back to the surcharging officer for reconsideration. therefore, i do not find any justification or reason tointerfere with the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //