Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2001 Page 9 of about 100 results (0.039 seconds)

Dec 10 2001 (HC)

Wasim Ahmed Khan Vs. Government of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-10-2001

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD264; 2002(5)ALT526

l. narasimha reddy, j.1. this writ petition is filed as a public interest litigation (pil) by the petitioner, who is a practising advocate. the relief claimed in the writ petition is for a declaration that the action (rather failure) of the respondent in not providing safe drinking water and also for not preventing the outbreak of cholera and gastro-enteritis diseases in the state of andhra pradesh, as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent to replace all the damaged and leaking drinking water pipes, replace the drainage system to prevent leakage and overflowing and to provide clean drinking water to all the citizens in the state.2. in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the petitioner had referred to certain news items in various newspapers about the outbreak of diseases like cholera and gastro-enteritis at various places, particularly in adilabad district, which is attributed to the failure of the government to supply safe drinking water. the petitioner referred to certain acts as well as omissions on the part of the government, which according to him, have given rise to a situation wherein nearly 900 people have died and 10,000 people became sick due to the said diseases. the relief claimed in the writ petition is two fold, viz., to provide safe drinking water and to ensure proper drainage system to prevent spreading of all diseases and epidemics.3. in response to the rule nisi, however, after seeking several extensions of time .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 2001 (HC)

Dr. Shyam Sunder Prasad and Others Vs. Commissioner, Mch, Hyd. and Oth ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-13-2001

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD851; 2001(6)ALT209

b. subhashan reddy, j. 1. at issue, is the validity of the action of the commissioner, municipal corporation of hyderabad in declaring the property of the petitioners as a slum area in exercise of the powers under section 3(1) of the andhra pradesh slum improvement (acquisition of land) act, 1956. 2. the notifications were issued and gazetted differently for different areas owned by the petitioners. while in wp no. 19117 of 1987, notification was issued on 14-10-1987 and gazetted on 5-11-1987, in wp no. 673 of 1992 the notification was issued on 4-12-1991, which was gazetted on 26-12-1991. in the said writ petitions, the validity of the above notifications is assailed as being unconstitutional, illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction. insofar as wp no. 9668 of 1987 is concerned, a declaration is sought, for that the action of respondents 1 and 2 in issuing slum area occupancy certificates to the tenants of the petitioners in premises bearing municipal nos.5-4-51 to 5-4-108 and 5-4-123 to 5-4-182/2 as illegal as also the action of respondents 3 to 5 in issuing electricity connections to the above premises without the consent of the petitioners. 3. the property is situated in the heart of hyderabad city in between mozamjahi market and abid shopping complex and is surrounded by all commercial houses and is the ancestral property of the petitioners. there was a civil action for partition among themselves in os no. 300 of 1973 on the file of ii additional judge, city civil .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 2001 (HC)

Rainbow Children's Medicare (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-01-2001

Reported in : 2002(2)ALT372; [2002]126STC418(AP)

orders.r. nayak, j.1. in this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the constitutional validity of the andhra pradesh tax on luxuries in hotels and lodging houses act, 1987 as amended by the andhra pradesh tax on luxuries in hotels and lodging houses (amendment) act (amendment act 28 of 1996) in so far as it relates to the levy of luxuries tax on corporate hospitals.2. the petitioner is rainbow children's medicare (p) limited, and it is a private limited company and is running a children's hospital established in the year 1998 with all modern medical equipments making use of the services of highly trained medical professionals. the main object of the petitioner, it is stated, is to provide paediatric and neo natal services to the people at large. it is also stated that the management of the hospital has made provision to render medical services to poor and needy by free/concessional services.3. according to the petitioner, the deputy commercial tax officer, vigilance and enforcement, hyderabad city range, the first respondent herein, visited the hospital and instructed the assistant manager in-charge of the hospital to pay luxury tax under the act and a report was sent to the commercial tax officer, jubilee hills circle, hyderabad, the second respondent, in that regard. the second respondent deputed the deputy commercial tax officer, jubilee hills circle, hyderabad, the third respondent herein to inspect the petitioner's hospital and accordingly the third respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2001 (TRI)

S. Kishan Rao and Others Vs. Sudha Nursing Home and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Apr-20-2001

p. ramakrishnam raju, president: 1. the first complainant is the husband, while the complainants 2 to 5 are the children of late kamalamma and first complainant. 2. late kamalamma hereinafter called ??the deceased complained of chest pain and she was taken to the first opposite party nursing home belonging to the opposite parties 2 and 3 on 7.7.1991. after initial diagnosis by the opposite parties 2 and 3 who are wife and husband respectively on 9.7.1991 the disease is diagnosed by them as ??benign cystic of breast ? . both the doctors have advised her to undergo an operation and assured early recovery. accordingly on 9.7.1991 her right breast was operated after procuring report of the pathologist dr. b. narayan rao. after treating her for about one week in their hospital they have discharged her assuring that everything would be normal. 3. however to the utter surprise of the complainants the deceased developed a lump in about 5 to 6 months in the right breast again on account of the defective operation conducted by the opposite parties 2 and 3 on 9.7.1991. after conducting investigations they advised her to undergo second operation after procuring the report dated 5.1.1992 of pathologist dr. b. narayan rao. in good faith the first complainant and the deceased have consented for the same and accordingly the second operation of the right breast of the deceased was conducted on 5.1.1992 removing the lump and gave further treatment. but soon thereafter another lump developed in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2001 (HC)

Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Chittoor Vs. Arya Vysya ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-30-2001

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD796

p.s. narayana, j. 1. the assistant commissioner, endowments department, chittoor, the plaintiff in os no.1 of 1981 on the file of the district judge, chittoor is the appellant. the suit os no.1 of 1981 on the file of district judge, chittoor was filed for setting aside the order dated 31-3-1980 of the deputy commissioner of endowments, kurnool made in oa no. 16 of 1969 as illegal and unsustainable in law or facts, declaring the schedule mentioned properties as a public property and a charitable institution.2. the case of the appellant-plaintiff is that arya vysya sangham is a registered body and the site on which the arya vysya hostel was constructed, was gifted to the sangham by one tangutoori ramaiah chetty and the gift was made for the purpose of constructing a hostel to the students belonging to the arya vysya community and to provide sufficient site for purpose of marriage of persons of that community and a building with two floors was constructed on the site gifted and it comprises large number of rooms for the residence of the students and a big marriage hall, kitchen and dining facility attached to it and the funds for such construction of buildings were raised from the members of the society and others. it was also further pleaded in the plaint that sri t.n. kantharaja chetty representing the arya vysya sangham was managing the affairs of the hostel and the site over which the hostel and kalyana mandapam was constructed had been gifted to the sangham for specified .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 2001 (HC)

Shrimad Sudhindra Thirtha Swamy Vs. Sri Kasi Math Samsthan, Tirumala, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-07-2001

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD497; 2001(6)ALT329

orderp.s. narayana, j 1. this batch of civil miscellaneous appeals and civil revision petitions arise out of the different interlocutory orders passed in os no.34 of 2000 on the file of the iii additional district judge, tirupathi. since both the parties have filed the civil miscellaneous appeals and civil revision petitions, the parties hereinafter will be referred to in their position as arrayed in os no.34 of 2000 on the file of the iii additional district judge, tirupathi.2. at the outset, we may observe that the dispute relates to the office of matadhipathi of sri kashimath samsthan. it is really unfortunate that the spiritual and religious preachers, who are expected to be pious and devotional, are involving in litigations of this nature. mathi in fact has been the most important institution relating to hindu religious system. the word 'mata' is defined as a hut of an ascetic or student, a monastic school or college and matadhipathi is defined as the head of such institution. see macdonnels's dictionary and also dictionary by apte.) in sammantha pandara v. sellappa chetty (2 mad. 175), it was observed ' a preceptor of religious doctrine gathers around him a number of disciples whom he initiates into the particular mysteries of the order and instructs in its religious tenets. such of these disciples as intend to become teachers renounce their connection with the family and all claims to follow wealth and as it were, affiliate themselves to the spiritual teacher whose .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2001 (HC)

V.V. Sai and anr. Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Drug Inspector

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-25-2001

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD(Cri)688; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)417

1. this is a petition filed by the petitioners, who are arrayed as a-3 and a-4, to quash the proceedings in c.c. no.314 of 1997 on the file of the judicial i class magistrate (mobile), mahaboobnagar, which was filed under section 32 of the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act').2. a complaint was filed against the petitioners herein and others viz., m/s. vasavi integrated service company (a-1); sri o.s.s. prasad (a-2), which was registered as c.c. no.314 of 1997, alleging as follows:-on 31-12-1994, the drugs inspector i.e., l.w.1, seized the drug 'tetracycline' capsules i.p., batch no.433, wherein it is mentioned that the manufacturing date is march 1994 and the expiry date is february 1996, manufactured by maharashtra antibiotics and pharmaceuticals limited, nagpur, from the stores of district medical & health officer, mahabubnagar. after following the procedure as laid down under section 23 of the act, the drugs inspector sent the sample to the government analyst who submitted a report dated 28-2-1995 to the effect that the sample drug is 'not to standard quality' for the reason that the content of tetracycline, hydrochloride was found only 135.3 mg., instead of 250 mg. as printed on the label. the drugs inspector issued a notice under section 18-a of the act to the district medical & health officer, mahabubnagar to furnish the names and addresses of the persons from whom the said drug was purchased. pursuant to that, the district medical & .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2001 (HC)

General Manager (Now Re-designated as Managing Director) and Others Vs ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-14-2001

Reported in : 2001ACJ1860; 2001(5)ALD404; 2001(5)ALT130a

orders.b. sinha, c.j. 1. the reference to this bench has been made in peculiar situation although no question of any importance arises for consideration in thisappeal.2. one rajanna died on 22-2-1983 in a road accident that took place on 19-2-1983. the said accident allegedly took place on account of rash and negligent driving by the respondent no.4. the vehicle was owned by a.p. state road transport corporation. an application under section 110b of the motor vehicles act was filed claiming a sum of rs. 3,00,000/- towards compensation. the motor vehicles accidents claims tribunal upon consideration of the material on record awarded a sum of rs. 57,000/-with 6% interest from the date of realisation.3. on appeal preferred thereagainst by the respondent herein, a learned single judge of this court enhanced the compensation amount to rs. 3,15,600/- and in place of 6%, the learned judge awarded 12% interest per annum. when this lpa came up before a division bench of this court (n.y. hanumanthappa and vaman rao, jj.), having regard to the decision of the apex court in general manager, ksrtc v. susamma thomas, : air1994sc1631 , on facts it was recorded:the learned single judge by following the authoritative pronouncement made by the apex court in general manager, kerala road transport corporation v. mrs. susamma thomas, : air1994sc1631 , doubled the earning of the deceased and fixed the same at rs. 1,400.00 after deducting one third of the earning for the personal use of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 2001 (HC)

Referring Officer the I Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge Vs. Arja Narasi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-11-2001

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD(Cri)175

ramesh madhav bapat, j. 1. criminal appeal no. 610/2001 is filed by the accused in sessions case no. 438/2000 against the order of conviction and sentence recorded by the i additional sessions judge, machilipatnam, of the offence punishable under section 302 of the indian penal code. the learned sessions judge sentenced the appellant-accused to death. the reference in referred trial no. 3/2001 is made by the learned sessions judge for confirmation of the death sentence recorded by him against the accused. 2. the substance of the charge against the accused was that on 12.8.2000 at about 8.30 a. m., he caused the death of his wife named arja leela by hacking her with a knife on her head and other parts of her body. 3. the prosecution story can be briefly narrated as follows. marriage between the accused and the deceased took place about 20 years prior to the incident. they lived at pedayadara village. out of their wedlock, three daughters and two sons were born to them. 4. p.w.1 happened to the mother of the deceased. p.w.8 is one of the married daughters of the accused and the deceased. marriage of p.w.8 was performed by the accused about five years prior to the incident. at the time of the marriage of his two daughters, the accused promised to give 10 cents of land to each of them by way of 'pasupu kumkuma'. the accused did not fulfil his promise. there fore, p.w.8 used to complain against the same. the wife of the accused also used to pester him to deliver the land to their .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2001 (HC)

Avon Industries Ltd. Vs. Integrated Finance Company Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-30-2001

Reported in : 2001(1)ALD(Cri)461; 2001(1)ALT(Cri)331; 2002CriLJ4592

ordert. ch. surya rao, j.1. the petitioners seek to invoke the inherent jurisdiction of this court under section 482 of the criminal procedure code ('the code' for brevity) for quashing the criminal proceedings initiated against them by the first respondent herein.2. although some of the parties are different and some are same, as common questions of law an; involved all these petitions can be disposed of together.criminal petition nos. 4432 to 4439 of 1999 :3. the factual matrix, which is germane, for effective adjudication of the matter, may be set forth thus :the first petitioner-m/s. avon industries limited is a company duly incorporated under the provisions of the companies act. the second petitioner is its managing director, the third petitioner is its joint director, and the fourth petitioner is its executive director. the first respondent is also a company duly incorporated under the provisions of the companies act. the first respondent-company has been carrying on business as corporate financiers. the first petitioner-company obtained finance from the first respondent-company for the purposes of its business. in discharge of the said debt and towards part payment of the amounts due, the first petitioner- company issued various cheques drawn on canara bank, basheerbagh branch, hyderabad, in favour of the first respondent-company. when the first respondent-company at the request of petitioners presented those cheques for clearance, those cheques were bounced. the first .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //