Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2002 Page 5 of about 70 results (0.095 seconds)

Jun 27 2002 (HC)

Dr. K. Ramachandra Reddy Vs. Registrar, Angrau, Hyderabad and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-27-2002

Reported in : 2002(4)ALD767; 2002(4)ALT430

..... if the courts or the tribunals find that the selection and appointment of a candidate is in infraction of mandatory statutory provisions or on other permissible grounds of illegality or patent material irregularity in the constitution of the selection committee, or its procedure vitiating the selection or proved mala fides affecting the selection etc. it is because, we, the people of ..... has the expertise on the subject. the court has no such expertise. the decision of the selection committee can be interfered with only on limited grounds, such as illegality or patent material irregularity in the constitution of the committee or its procedure vitiating the selection, or proved mala fides affecting the selection etc. it is not disputed that in the present .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 2002 (HC)

Siemens Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Additional Industrial Tribunal-cum ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-16-2002

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD492; 2002(6)ALT446; [2003(96)FLR819]

..... his right to hold thepost and receive wages therefor. therefore on the anvil of the principle of where the impugned order operates the situs of employment of the workman is patently significant.... 15. again on the second principle attracted to the industrial dispute having some nexus with the territory of the state, the situs of employment of the workman assumes signal ..... the patna held at paragraphs 14, 15 and 16 held as under' '14. .... consequently the situs of the workman's employment in the case of termination of his service is patently a paramount fact if not being wholly conclusive. it is within the area of employment that the order of termination operates and the workman ceases to be a workman and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 2002 (HC)

Shyamala and ors. Vs. Ram Bilas Tapadia and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-08-2002

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD593; 2004(1)ALT22

..... findings reached by the lower appellate court is without consideration of the entire evidence on record and thus the findings reached by the lower appellate court are erroneous, perverse or patently illegal which require interference in the second appeal. on careful consideration of the entire evidence on record, i come to the conclusion that the plaintiff failed to prove the execution ..... appellate court without considering the entire evidence on record can be challenged in the second appeal? 3. whether the findings reached by the lower appellate court is erroneous, perverse or patently illegal or suffers from procedural irregularity which can be questioned under section 100 c.p.c? 11. points 1 to 3 :---defendants 1, 4 and 5 are the appellants in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 2002 (HC)

Dhara Mary Pushpalatha Vs. Puvvada Nageswara Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-23-2002

Reported in : 2003(2)ALT184

..... dismissed. it appears from record that inasmuch as a conditional decree was passed, the decree was not drafted and a letters patent appeal was preferred on the strength of the judgment only. it also appears that ultimately the letters patent appeal was disposed of with a direction to the lower court to supply a certified copy of the decree to the appellant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2002 (HC)

Hindustan Lever Limited and anr. Vs. Board of Trustees, Visakhapatnam ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-16-2002

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD323

..... in execution of the order. in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the state government within its authority to cancel the supply order. the high court fell into patent error and acted with material illegality in entertaining and allowing the writ petition.' 33. it is further contended that the services mentioned under the provisions of section 42, do not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 2002 (HC)

Chittipolu Kishan and ors. Vs. Govt. of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-23-2002

Reported in : 2002(3)ALD578; 2002(4)ALT93

gopalakrishna tamada, j.1. in this appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent, the appellants assail the judgment of learned single judge dated 18-10-2001 in writ petition no.28338 of 1996 by which the same is dismissed.2. the factual matrix .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2002 (HC)

industrial Finance Corporation of India Limited, New Delhi Vs. Sree Kr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-18-2002

Reported in : 2002(3)ALD781; 2002(3)ALT168

..... and the company was informed that the balance of the principal amounts to be disbursed would be treated as adjusted towards interest and that action of the financial institutions is patently illegal and not in public interest. in the writ affidavit, it is contended by the petitioner-company that if the financial institutions had disbursed the loans sanctioned in the first .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2002 (HC)

R. Samba Murthy Vs. the Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Lh ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-26-2002

Reported in : 2002(6)ALT733

..... enquiry officer and review the findings recorded by him. it is only in rare cases where the finding is recorded when there is no evidence, or where the findings are patently perverse, that the high court would undertake appreciation of the evidence vis--vis the charges. having regard to the fact that voluminous evidence was recorded before the enquiry officer and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 2002 (HC)

M. Yoga Priya Vs. the N.T.R. University of Health Sciences Rep. by Its ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-17-2002

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD188

..... has the expertise on the subject. the court has no such expertise. the decision of the selection committee can be interfered with only on limited grounds, such as illegality or patent material irregularly in the constitution of the committee or its procedure vitiating the selection or proved mala fides affecting the selection etc., it is not disputed that in the present .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2002 (HC)

Bolisetti Venkateswara Rao and ors. Vs. Nadakuditi Venkateswara Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-01-2002

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD256; 2002(6)ALT103

..... was dismissed. therefore the defendants filed both the appeals before the learned single judge. the learned single judge upheld the judgment of the trial court and therefore these two letters patent appeals have been filed by the defendants.3. the brief facts giving rise to filing of the suit for specific performance are that, the tenancy by the plaintiff was accepted .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //