Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 90 results (0.036 seconds)

Dec 08 2003 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi), South Central Railways Vs. Kurukundu Balakrishna ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-08-2003

Reported in : II(2004)ACC591; 2004ACJ529; 2004(1)ALD449; 2004(1)ALT100

..... m.r. in 1898 found the rule 'as necessary now as it was when lord coke reported 'heydon's case (v)'. in - 'eastman photographic material co. v. comptroller general of patents. designs and trade marks', 1898 ac 571 earl of halsbury re-affirmed the rule as follows:'my lords, it appears to me that to construe the statute in question, it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 10 2003 (HC)

Gandla Pannala Bhulaxmi Vs. Managing Director, Apsrtc and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-10-2003

Reported in : 2003ACJ2004; AIR2003AP458; 2003(4)ALT216; 2003(3)CTC667

..... clear and specific terms prohibits further appeal against the decree and judgment or order of a learned single judge to a division bench notwithstanding anything contained in the letters patent. the letters patent which provides for further appeal to a division bench remains intact, but the right to prefer a further appeal is taken away even in respect of the matters ..... of the code, which prohibits filing of further appeal against the decree and judgment or order of a learned single judge to a division bench notwithstanding anything contained in letters patent, had fallen for consideration in that case. on the other hand, it is implicit in the said judgment that the statutory enactment concerned can always exclude and affect the ..... court observed:'even the power flowing from the paramount charter under which the high court functions would not get excluded unless the statutory enactment concerned expressly excludes appeals under letters patent. no such bar is discernible from section 6(3) of the specific relief act. it could not be seriously contended by learned counsel for the respondents that if clause ..... civil procedure, which prohibits preferring of further appeals in certain cases. the division bench noticed the effect of non-obstante clause employed in section 100a prohibiting the filing of letters patent appeals against the decrees and judgments of a learned single judge - be it original or appellate decree or order. section 100a of the code makes it abundantly clear that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2003 (HC)

Girijan Co-op. Corporation Ltd. Vs. Imalla Srinivasa Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-10-2003

Reported in : 2003(6)ALT298

..... the judgment and decree of a learned single judge in a.s.no. 2663 of 1993, dated 03-4-2003, this lpa is preferred under section 15 of the letters patent act.2. the respondent herein was removed from service on the basis of an inquiry report submitted by the enquiry officer in rc.no. 209/79/a(vja), dated 03 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2003 (HC)

P. Eshwari Balarajaiah and ors. Vs. Md. Riyas and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-22-2003

Reported in : 2003(5)ALD305

..... chandra's case (supra 2). accordingly, we hold that the multiplier applied by the tribunal as well as the learned single judge is correct.11. in the result, this letters patent appeal is allowed in part enhancing the compensation amount under the head of loss of dependency from rs. 86,400/- to rs. 1,90,080/-. the compensation amounts awarded by ..... . till realization.5. aggrieved at the judgment of the learned single judge in a.a.o.1238 of 1996, this letters patent appeal is preferred by the claimants.6. the only question that arises for consideration in this letters patent appeal is - whether the tribunal as well as the learned single judge of this court have rightly arrived at the earnings of ..... 1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the order in a.a.o. no. 1238 of 1996 dated 26-6-2001 of the learned single judge of this court.2. the above a. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2003 (HC)

Dr. K.V. Seshaiah Vs. Ntr University of Health Sciences and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-12-2003

Reported in : 2003(3)ALD435

..... courses this court will not normally interfere in exercise of its jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india unless the procedure followed is arbitrary or vitiated by any patent material irregularity or where the mala fides attributed are established. in the case of admission committee, c.i.i. 1995 v. anand kumar, : (1998)8scc333 , the supreme court observed that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 25 2003 (HC)

S. Rami Reddy Vs. Vice-chairman and Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-25-2003

Reported in : 2003(4)ALD609; 2003(6)ALT390

..... 14 of the constitution of india, does not insist the classification to be scientifically perfect or logically complete, and the classification would be justified unless it is proved to be patently arbitrary, and to support his contention that the authorities should be allowed some 'play in the joints' while making classification or dealing with policy matters, he placed reliance on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2003 (HC)

Gnana Bharathi Educational Academy Vs. A.P. State Council of Higher Ed ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-23-2003

Reported in : 2003(5)ALD432

..... the party in sufferance is a respondent to the lis or proceedings cannot confer any further sanctity or authority and validity which it is shown and found to obviously and patently lack. it would, therefore, be a myth to state that regulations made under section 23 of the act have 'constitutional' and legal status, even unmindful of the fact that anyone .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 2003 (HC)

S.V.B.N.R. English Medium High School Vs. Commissioner of Endowments a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-21-2003

Reported in : 2003(4)ALD173; 2003(4)ALT802

..... relates to that schedule. but, in the instant case the schedule as already observed is a totally different schedule containing different properties. thus it is not only a case of patent error in procedure, but a capricious exercise of discretion resulting in manifest injustice. thus, viewed from any angle, the impugned order cannot be salvaged.29. accordingly, the civil revision petition ..... beyond its jurisdiction, refusal to exercise jurisdiction, error of law apparent on record as distinguished from a mere mistake of law, arbitrary or capricious exercise of authority or discretion, a patent error in procedure, arriving a finding which is perverse or based on no material, or resulting in manifest injustice. as regards finding of fact of the inferior court, the high .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2003 (HC)

State of A.P. Vs. Laksminarayana @ Langoda Laxman

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Reported in : 2003(3)ALD57; 2003(3)ALT439

..... heirs or successors in our or their privy council, as hereinafter provided.'from plain reading of this clause it is clear that there is no letters patent jurisdiction available to the high court over an order of single judge passed while exercising revisional jurisdiction. it is also not available against judgments of learned ..... 1st court and the 1 st court passed the following order:'treat the note submitted by the office as an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent against that part of the judgment in which the directions are issued to the subordinate courts. admit. issue notice. until further order, there shall be ..... judge in a criminal revision is at all amenable to letters patent jurisdiction of the high court and if such appeal is maintainable whether the registrar (judicial) could have put up a note and the chief justice could ..... note of the registrar (judicial) was treated by the division bench headed by the learned chief justice as an lpa under clause 15 of the letters patent and the order of the learned single judge was partially stayed. we have our own doubts as to whether an order passed by the learned single ..... is not a judge of andhra pradesh high court now, therefore in compulsion, as the judges who passed the earlier order treating the matter as letters patent appeal are not available, we have heard this matter. when this matter came up before us on 8-11-2002 we have passed the following order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2003 (HC)

G.J.R. Sunand Vs. Convention of Baptist Churches of Northern Circars ( ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-24-2003

Reported in : 2003(2)ALT261

..... order under appeal has been passed by the learned single judge in the interest of the institutions and it calls no interference by this court in exercise of its letters patent jurisdiction.23. in our considered opinion, it is not really necessary to decide as to whether the office of the convener of the education committee is an elective or nominated ..... as to whether the judgment under appeal suffers from any infirmities requiring any correction as such by this court in exercise of its jurisdiction under clause 15 of the letters patent, it may be necessary to notice the relevant facts leading to filing of the writ petition and as well as this writ appeal.3. the dispute essentially centres round the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //