Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2012 Page 2 of about 93 results (0.050 seconds)

Aug 16 2012 (HC)

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by Its Chief Secretary a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-16-2012

..... to the post of dgp (hopf), since the yadav judgment (which dealt with those rules as well), is stayed. we would dilate no further on this analysis. the contention is patently misconceived and does not proceed on any acceptable interpretation of the phraseology of the supreme court observation : appointment, if any, made in the meantime, will be subject to the final .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2012 (HC)

N. Veeraju. Vs. M.V.Reddy, Director of Animal Husbandry

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-26-2012

..... the directions given by the learned single judge while disposing the writ petition and on that ground contends that intra-court appeal is maintainable under clause 15 of the letters patent. (4) we find difficulty in accepting the said submission that there is any contra finding recorded by the successor judge while dismissing the contempt case. the learned successor judge, who ..... decision of the supreme court in midnapore peoples' coop. bank ltd.'s case (1 supra), learned counsel contended that the appeal is maintainable even under clause 15 of the letters patent, as a contrary finding and a different order is passed by the learned single judge, while deciding the contempt case, than the findings reached in the original order in the ..... contrary to the findings of this court in the final order in the writ petition and seeks to justify the maintainability of the appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent as well as under section 19 of the contempt of courts act, 1971. 6. re - maintainability: (1) under section 19 of the contempt of courts act, 1971, it is well ..... ) this contempt appeal is directed against the order of the learned single judge dated 19.12.2011 in c.c.no.519 of 2008 under clause 15 of the letters patent appeal and section 19 of the contempt of courts act, 1971 read with rule 36 of the rules framed under the contempt of courts act, 1971. 2. on 14.02 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 2012 (HC)

The Government of A.P., Rep. by Its Secretary and Others Vs. G. Sanjee ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-07-2012

Reported in : 2012(5)ALD193; 2012(5)ALT410

(prayer: write apeal under clause 15 of the letters patent against the order in w.v.m.p.no. 1937 of 2010 in w.p.m.p.no. 10997 of 2008 in w.p.no.8318 of 2008 dt. 12/ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2012 (HC)

M/S. Northgate Technologies Limited

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-28-2012

..... scheme is meant. (miheer h. mafatlal). unless the scheme is shown to be contrary to any law or is such as to shock the conscience of the court or is patently unfair to the members or creditors or any class of them, or is against public interest or against public policy, the court should not come in the way of business .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 2012 (HC)

D.Venkata Krishna Rao Vs. Government of A.P., Rep. by Principal Se

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-03-2012

..... the impugned order/action is in breach of natural justice (institute of chartered accountants of india v l.k.ratna17); and (iv) when challenge is to the action which is patently erroneous and ex facie without jurisdiction (champalal binani and whirlpool corporation v registrar of trade marks, mumbai18). in addition to these, if a matter requires technical knowledge, which is available .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 2012 (HC)

Govt. of A.P., Rep. by Its Principal Secretary, School Education Depar ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-05-2012

..... the rank list to get appointment against the available vacancies, had bed candidates been excluded from the selections. the impugned judgment of the division bench is both illegal, inequitable and patently unjust. the ttc candidates before us as appellants have been wrongly deprived of due chance of selection and appointment. the impugned judgment of the division bench, therefore, deserves to be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 13 2012 (HC)

M/S. Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd., Old Bowenpally, Secunderabad Repr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-13-2012

..... , insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, weedicides and other plant protection equipment and accessories thereof (including drip and sprinkle irrigation systems but excluding mosquito repellents in any form). 88. drugs and medicines whether patent or proprietary, as defined in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of section 3(b) of drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 (central act 23 of 1940), and hypodermic syringes, hypodermic needles .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 07 2012 (HC)

Cable Corporation of India Limited,rep. Vs. A.P. Micro and Small Enter ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-07-2012

..... or tribunal of first instance acts wholly without jurisdiction or patently in excess of jurisdiction or manifestly conducts the proceedings before it in a manner which is contrary to the rules of natural justice and all accepted rules of procedure and ..... cases - and the instant case is in point - where the error, irregularity or illegality touching jurisdiction or procedure committed by an inferior court or tribunal of first instance is so patent and loudly obtrusive that it leaves on its decision an indelible stamp of infirmity or vice which cannot be obliterated or cured on appeal or revision. if an inferior court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2012 (HC)

Kalavakuri Mallikarjuna Rao and Others Vs. the Government of Andhra Pr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-31-2012

..... not augur well, either for him, or for the administration, of which, he is a part. the discussion undertaken above discloses that respondents 2 and 3 have acted in a patently illegal, highhanded, capricious manner, and in a way, have exhibited the conduct, which is unbecoming of persons, holding such posts. the writ petitions are accordingly allowed, and the order dated ..... of the person who executes the document. however, arrogance and the one of upmanship of the 2nd respondent did not permit him to look to reason. even while committing a patent illegality, in a matter, which any officer in his place would not have entertained, has crossed all barriers of legality, propriety and restraint, in trying to pronounce upon the legality .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2012 (HC)

M/S. Krishna 70 Mm theatre, Rep. by Its Vs. the State of Andhra Prades ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-19-2012

..... managed to obtain the permission from the government. he contends that the observations made by the division bench in w.p. no.15152 of 2006 demonstrate that the construction is patently illegal. learned counsel submits that though this court declined to interfere with the permission, it has not interdicted the proceedings that can be initiated under the relevant enactments. he submits .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //