Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2013 Page 3 of about 78 results (0.037 seconds)

Oct 04 2013 (HC)

P.Anand Rao and OThe Vs. State of A.P.Represented by Its Public P

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-04-2013

..... against the accused or the complaint does not disclose the essential ingredients of an offence which is alleged against the accused; (2) where the allegations made in the complaint are patently absurd and inherently improbable so that no prudent person can ever reach a conclusion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused; (3) where the discretion exercised by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 2013 (HC)

M/S Mallikarjuna Medical and Genemral Stor Vs. Assistant Directo, Sale ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-11-2013

..... either the parliament or the rule making authority. there is no reason to give any meaning other than the natural and obvious meaning to the words 'on his premises' which patently mean premises which belong to the licensee or are under his custody and possession. as we have found, the godown was in his custody when these physician's samples were .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 2013 (HC)

Smt. Sontiramanamma, W/O. Narayana Redd Vs. Hussainibegum, W/O.Mohd. M ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-06-2013

..... acknowledgment of the title. viewed from any angle, the finding recorded by the learned single judge that the plea of adverse possession is not proved, cannot be countenanced. the letters patent appeal is accordingly allowed. there shall be no order as to costs. the miscellaneous petitions filed in this appeal shall stand disposed of. __________________________ l. narasimha reddy, j __________________________ m ..... : the honourable sri justice l. narasimha reddy and the honourable sri justice m.s.k.jaiswal letters patent appeal no.17 of 2000 judgment: - (per the hon'ble sri justice l. narasimha reddy) this letters patent appeal filed under clause 15 of the letters patent is directed against the judgment and decree dated 31.08.1999 passed by a learned single judge of ..... the honourable sri justice l.narasimha reddy and the honourable sri justice m.s.k.jaiswal letters patent appeal no.17 of 2000 06-12-2013 smt. sonti ramanamma, w/o. narayana reddy, hindu, aged:46. years, d.no.32-26- 74,machavaram, vijayawada,krishna district and another... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 2013 (HC)

K.Radhakrishnaiah and Ot Vs. Sree Seetharama Bhaktha Sangam and Ot

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-06-2013

..... d.w.1 admitted her signature on ex.a1, the contents thereof including the payment of advance of rs.1,000/- can be taken as true, notwithstanding the patent illegality from which the said document suffered. we are of the view that alternative relief of refund of the amount together with interest can be granted. since the amount ..... hindu minority and guardianship act. both the appeals were dismissed. though it is not necessary to frame any points in an appeal filed under clause 15 of the letters patent, we find that the following points arise for consideration:1. whether the present l.p.a. is barred by the principle of res judicata?.2. whether the ..... sri justice m.s.k.jaiswal l.p.a.no.12 of 2003 06-12-2013 judgment: (per the hon'ble sri justice l.narasimha reddy) this letters patent raises certain important questions of law, apart from presenting a complex set of facts. it arises out of a decree, dated 12.09.1986, passed by the court ..... judgment, dated 18.02.2002, a learned single judge of this court dismissed both the appeals. hence, this l.p.a. under clause 15 of the letters patent is filed against the decree in a.s.no.2638 of 1986. it is relevant to mention here that the remedy of appeal under clause 15 of the letters ..... patent stood removed with effect from 01.07.2002 by virtue of amendments to the c.p.c., through act no.22 of 2002. the present l.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 2013 (TRI)

Metta Krishna Rao Vs. M/S the Seven Hills Hospital Rep. by Its Managin ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Aug-19-2013

..... accrued to the consumer. each case is to be decided on its own facts. if the effect of negligence on the doctors part or any person associated with him is patent, the cause of action will be deemed to have arisen on the date when the act of negligence was done. if, on the other hand, the effect of negligence is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 2013 (HC)

Ch.Venkata Rao and Other Vs. J.R. Rameshji,secunderab

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-24-2013

..... .75 of 1979 remains un-rebutted. the learned single judge has taken all these aspects into account and allowed the appeal. we do not find any merits in the letters patent appeal and the appeal is accordingly dismissed. the miscellaneous application filed in this appeal shall also stand disposed of. there shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ l. narasimha ..... .no.1959 of 1992 before this court. a learned single judge of this court allowed the said appeal through judgment dated 24.9.2001. then, this letters patent appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent. sr.g. krsihna murthy, learned counsel for the appellants submits that one m/s.j.b.bodo & company filed o.s.no.25 of 1979 in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 10 2013 (HC)

Rashtriya Pariyojana Nirman Nigam Limite Vs. M/S.P.L.Raju Construction ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-10-2013

..... . it is only when the misconduct in the context of conducting proceedings on the part of the arbitrator is pleaded and established, or where the award is found to be patently illegal, that the court can interfere with the same. no such facts are pleaded or proved. hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed. there shall be no order as to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 2013 (HC)

The Govt. of A.P. and Another Vs. Sri V.Veera Redd

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-16-2013

..... enquiry officer has held that all the charges are proved, that too mostly on the basis of the enquiry report, dated 04.05.2000. learned counsel submits that there are patent errors in the whole exercise and the tribunal has taken correct and proper view of the matter. he further submits is that the vehicles are hired under the specific orders .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2013 (HC)

Katam Thimma Vs. A.Amar Babu and Anot

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-16-2013

..... well as the learned single judge, restricting the liability of the 2nd respondent to rs.12,500/- cannot be sustained. the point is, accordingly, answered. hence, we allow the letters patent appeal, enhancing the compensation to rs.2,00,000/- (rupees two lakhs only) and holding the respondents 1 and 2 liable to pay the entire compensation, jointly and severally. the ..... court. a learned single judge, through order, dated 20.09.1999, dismissed the c.m.a.and affirmed the order passed by the tribunal. hence, this letters patent appeal, under clause 15 of letters patent. heard sr.m. raja malla reddy, learned counsel for the appellant, and sr.b. venkataratnam, learned standing counsel for the 2nd respondent. the o.p.was, initially .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2013 (HC)

M.Anand Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer,adoni, Ku

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-28-2013

..... days in a month is causing inconvenience to the cardholders, this charge is wholly without substance. cancellation of the authorization of a dealer on such flimsy charge not only constitutes patent arbitrariness but also causes serious injustice to him. with regard to charge no.2, its gravaman is that the petitioner is not maintaining timings in running the fair price shop .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //