Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2015 Page 1 of about 38 results (0.110 seconds)

Sep 11 2015 (HC)

Coromandel Mining and Exports Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-11-2015

..... , would not like to incur the high costs involved in exploration activities and then compete for that resource in an open auction. the logic is similar to that applied in patents. firms are given incentives to invest in research and development with the promise of exclusive access to the market for the sale of that invention. such an approach is economically ..... vires and intra vires the provisions of the constitution. nevertheless, it cannot and will not compare which policy is fairer than the other, but, if a policy or law is patently unfair to the extent that it falls foul of the fairness requirement of article 14 of the constitution, the court would not hesitate in striking it down. ? (emphasis supplied) 21 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 2015 (HC)

Nallavelli Ashok The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secreta ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-05-2015

..... pass interlocutory orders. grant of interlocutory order is at the discretion of election tribunal. writ of certiorari can be issued to correct jurisdictional error or if the order passed is patently erroneous. this court cannot go into the merits as to whether the tribunal was justified in exercising discretion to pass the orders of suspension, when the same is made on ..... due consideration of rival claims. this court cannot substitute its view to the view of the election tribunal. the order impugned herein cannot be termed as patently erroneous. since, the election o.p., is pending consideration, this court cannot go into the merits of the issue involved at this stage. 15. accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2015 (HC)

Independent Gas Based Power Producers? A Vs. Union of India Represente ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-28-2015

..... when the economic policy is demonstrated to be violative of constitutional or legal limits on power or is abhorrent to reason, (balco employees union (regd.)48), or if it is patently arbitrary, discriminatory or mala fide. (dhampur sugar (kashipur) ltd.45; metropolis theater co.49; nandlal jaiswal50). any act of the repository of power, whether legislative or administrative or quasi-judicial ..... means of distribution, and give a constitutional answer as to which methods are either ultra vires or intra vires the provisions of the constitution. if a policy or law is patently unfair to the extent that it falls foul of the fairness requirement of article 14 of the constitution, the court would not hesitate in striking it down. (natural resources allocation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2015 (HC)

Potlabathuni Srikanth and Others Vs. Shriram City Union Finance Limite ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-01-2015

..... the act of 1996 means an appeal under the letters patent and since there is expressed prohibition to file such appeal no letters patent would lie. merely because the expression "second appeal" is used in this section does not mean an appeal under section 100 of the code ..... clear that no letters patent appeal would lie from an order in an appeal filed under section 37 of the act of 1996. the second appeal contemplated under sub-section (3) of section 37 of ..... civil procedure. the supreme court has further proceeded to observe that if the expression 'second appeal' includes an appeal under the letters patent, it would be impossible to hold that notwithstanding the express prohibition, an appeal under the letters patent from an order passed in appeal under subsection (1), of section 39 of the act of 1940, is competent. it is thus .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2015 (HC)

P. Surendra Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Chief Secret ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-06-2015

..... in, necessitating his being preventively detained; and the averment in the counter affidavit that he was enlarged on bail in three cases, and he has not submitted his representation, is patently false. on the other hand learned advocate-general, for the state of andhra pradesh, would submit that the detaining authority has detailed in his counter affidavit the reasons which weighed ..... is not detained, he would act in a prejudicial manner? at the point of time, when an order of detention is to be served on a person, it must be patent that the said person would act prejudicially if he is not detained, and that is a consideration which would be absent when the authority is dealing with a person already .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2015 (HC)

K. Ramachandran and Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-29-2015

..... interest of promotee deputy superintendents of police would get adversely affected. hence, we are of the opinion that an appeal against any such order is maintainable. 6. whether a letters patent appeal is maintainable? when writ proceedings rules do not provide for an intra-court appeal, whether lpa is maintainable? writ proceedings rules, is a special law and hence, lpa is ..... not maintainable against an order passed in a writ petition, either interim or final. clause 15 of letters patent granted by her majesty in council provides for an intra-court appeal. right to prefer an appeal in a judicial proceeding can only be granted by a statutory exercise. writ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2015 (HC)

Yarlagadda Yugandhar and Anoth Vs. State of a.P.Represented by the Dis ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-22-2015

..... has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit in respect of properties covered under the act and accordingly, dismissed the appeal. aggrieved by the dismissal of the firs.appeal, present letter patent appeal is filed. heard both sides. learned senior counsel appeared on behalf of appellants argued at length and has drawn our attention to both oral and documentary evidence and to ..... kumar l.p.a.no.169 of 2002 dated 22-7-2015 judgment: (per honourable sr.justice s.ravi kumar).this appeal is preferred under clause 15 of the letters patent aggrieved by the decree and judgment in appeal no.2253 of 1986 dated firs.february, 2002 of this court. appellants herein filed o.s.no.343 of 1982 seeking relief .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2015 (HC)

Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chary and Others Vs. Principal Secretary, Revenue ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-23-2015

..... the document in question. as the provisions of section 22a of the act are not attracted, the order of the 2nd respondent confirming the order of the 3rd respondent is patently illegal and without jurisdiction. 13. the impugned order of the 2nd respondent, confirming the order of the 3rd respondent, is set aside. the 3rd respondent shall, in accordance with the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 13 2015 (HC)

Samson Arthur Vs. Quinn Logistic India Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-13-2015

..... sri s. niranjan reddy, learned counsel for the respondent-company, that no intra-court appeal lies to a division bench, under clause 15 of the letters patent, against an order passed under section 340 and 341 cr.p.c. the question of maintainability of the appeal is, therefore, left open. vi. conclusion: ..... should be filed; at the stage of formation of such an opinion, the court does not exercise criminal jurisdiction; and, therefore, an appeal under letters patent would be available to the aggrieved party. as we are satisfied that the order of the learned company judge does not necessitate interference on merits, it ..... barred; and it was held that a specific exclusion may be clear from the words of a statute even though no specific reference is made to letters patent. in k. karunakaran (supra) the supreme court held that an order of the high court, made under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2 ..... an amicable settlement justifying compounding of the offences alleged against the appellants. it is also debatable whether the appellate court, under clause 15 of the letters patent, can compound these offences simultaneously exercising jurisdiction under section 482 cr.p.c. it must also be borne in mind that the submission, urged on ..... (dead) by lrs vs. andhra bank ltd., (2004) 11 scc 672) specified that, unless there is an express exclusion of the letters patent act, the said act would apply; in fact, in p.s. sathappan (supra), the supreme court upheld the position that an appeal, under the letters .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 13 2015 (HC)

Dundoo Ravi Kumar Vs. The Special Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing ( ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-13-2015

..... 3 is a decree or order passed in the original suit or appeal. it is subject to appeal under section 96 or 100 or 104 cpc or under the letters patent or such other law as the case may be. it is not an order on the application for review. it assumes a complexion altogether different from an order of review .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //