Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2015 Page 3 of about 38 results (0.036 seconds)

Dec 04 2015 (HC)

M/s. Felguera Gruas India Private Ltd., Visakhapatnam, rep. by its Dir ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-04-2015

..... upon merits or constitute adjudication, as such, no letters patent appeal lies. similarly, in the judgment in canbank financial services ltd.'s case (7 supra), it is held that the embargo on appeals under section 37 of the arbitration and ..... letters patent provided only appeals against the judgment and an appeal is filed against mere ordering notice, a division bench of this court has held that ordering of notice does not trench ..... would not render any assistance in support of the case of appellant. 9. on the other hand, in kunala subbarao's case (3 supra), while considering the scope of letters patent (ap) clause 15, it is held that mere ordering notice does not amount to judgment, as such, appeal against such ordering notice is not maintainable. when clause 15 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 04 2015 (HC)

M. Srividya Chowdary and Another Vs. M. Sreenivasulu and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-04-2015

..... the first ,appellate court. on second appeal to a single judge of the punjab high court, the auction purchaser lost the day. an appeal under cl. 10 of the letters patent in the punjab high court met the same fate. hence this appeal .. ? in the said case, obviously, no application was made by the judgment debtor for setting aside the sale .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 2015 (HC)

S. Zabeda Parveen Vs. A.P. Women €™s Cooperative Finance Co ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-16-2015

..... which was not in fact received, payment of rs.84,760/- was wrongly made to m/s. ram computers and that the facts and circumstances clearly indicate that she was patently in connivance with the said supplier and committed fraud for her personal gain causing a huge loss to the corporation. 6. the petitioner questioned the said suspension order by filing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 2015 (HC)

G. Kiran Kumar and Another Vs. The State of A.P., Rep. by the District ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-03-2015

..... action involving the rights of the third parties must be visited with proper reasons and rationality. the action taken without justifiable reasons by the state or its instrumentalities leads to patent arbitrariness and promotes irrationality and lack of accountability. the march of law in the administrative field has taken long strides to outrightly reject the stand taken by the respondents based .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 2015 (HC)

G.Koteswara R Vs. 1. E. Murali, Revenue Divisional office

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-21-2015

..... allotment to the petitioners fair price shop for the month of july 2015. in order to cover up their devious and abhorrent conduct, the respondents have come out with a patently false version that the petitioner has on his own stopped furnishing d.ds. for lifting the essential commodities. with a view to ensure that their stand passes muster of this ..... the dealer for the last 36 years and is not shown to have history of failure to lift the stocks in the past. (b) that the petitioner promptly questioned the patently illegal action of respondent no.1 in suspending his authorisation and succeeded in doing so. (c) that following his success in w.p.no.28875 of 2014, the petitioner punctually .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2015 (HC)

Mukesh Kumar and Others Vs. The Debts Recovery Tribunal rep., by its R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-16-2015

..... v. surendra mohnot (2014) 14 scc 77). a review of a judgment is a serious step, and reluctant resort to it is proper only where a glaring omission or a patent mistake or like grave error has crept in earlier by judicial fallibility. the present stage is not a virgin ground, but review of an earlier order which has the normal ..... on the face of the proceedings is an error which is based on clear ignorance or disregard of the provisions of law. such error is an error which is a patent error and not a mere wrong decision. (t.c. basappa v. t. nagappa (air 1954 sc 440); kamlesh verma (supra). it is essential that it should be something more than .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2015 (HC)

Sukeshini Kalohe D/O Late Kishan Kalokhe Vs. The State of Telangana R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-02-2015

..... nugatory in m.p.irrigation karamchari sangh v. state of m.p., the supreme court held as under: while conceding a very limited jurisdiction to the state government to examine patent frivolousness of the demands, it is to be understood as a rule, that adjudication of demads made by workmen should be left to the tribunal to decide.government cannot bear .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2015 (HC)

Smt. Dr. Renuka Datla and Oth Vs. Biological E Limited and Oth

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-15-2015

..... directors fell below the minimum number prescribed under section 252 of the act and the purported board meeting convened and conducted by respondent no.5 on 9-4-2013 was patently illegal and consequently the appointment of respondent no.4 as a director of the company was also illegal and nonest. (iv) that the board meeting held on 10-4-2013 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2015 (HC)

D.J Vs. Ch.Krishna Reddy and Anot

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-16-2015

..... the draft sale deed was presented by the respondents, the executing court has straightaway sent the same for registration. in the light of the legal position discussed above, it is patently obvious that the procedure followed by the executing court suffers from grave procedural illegality. therefore, the lower court is directed to consider the objections of the petitioner against the sketc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 2015 (HC)

M/S. Cyano Pharma (P) Limited and Ano Vs. The State of Telangana, Rep. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-31-2015

the honble sri justice vilas v. afzulpurkar writ petition nos.17912 of 2015 and batch 31-08-2015 m/s. cyano pharma (p) limited and another.petitioners the state of telangana, rep. by its principal secretary, health, medical and family welfare department, secretariat, hyderabad and another.respondents counsel for petitioners: mr. raghunandan for mr. d. narender naik mr. y. subba rao counsel for respondent : mr. c. appaiah sharma r2 gp for medical, health & family welfare (tg) r1

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //