Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 15 results (0.039 seconds)

Mar 16 2016 (HC)

Gurcharan Singh Sahney and Others Vs. Harpreet Singh Chabbra and Other ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-16-2016

..... of law apparent from the record as distinguished from a mere mistake. interference may also be necessary in cases of arbitrary or capricious exercise of authority or discretion or a patent error in procedure. (achutananda baidya (supra). if the evidence on record, in respect of a question of fact, has not been taken into consideration and, without reference to such evidence ..... . ltd. v. state of bihar (1955) 2 scr 603 = air 1955 sc 661); in re mayfair property company (1898) 2 ch 28); eastman photographic material company v. comptroller general of patents, designs and trade marks (1898) ac 571); national insurance co. ltd. v. baljit kaur (2004) 2 scc 1). the heydon's rule itself is sometimes stated as a primary cannon .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2016 (HC)

S.P. Abdulla Saheb and Others Vs. K. Krishna Murthy and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-02-2016

..... at his request and is subject to the following conditions. 1) he should take last rank below the probationer and approved probationer working in this department/ division. 44. it is patently clear from the above condition that the original applicants agreed to take the last rank below (1) the probationers and (2) the approved probationers working in the commercial taxes department .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 2016 (HC)

Ultra Tech Cement Limited Vs. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-08-2016

..... this case and merely because the workman has not filed an application before the conciliation officer, the dispute raised before the industrial tribunal cannot be invalidated. i do not see patent error committed by the labour court in entertaining the dispute and over-ruling the objection on maintainability of the dispute directly without waiting for 45 days. point is answered accordingly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 2016 (HC)

Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited (TSIIC L ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-04-2016

common judgment: nooty ramamohana rao, j.) these original side appeals preferred under clause 15 of the letters patent are directed against the order and judgment rendered by the learned company judge in company applications no. 767 and 1225 of 2013. the appellant is telangana state industrial infrastructure corporation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 2016 (HC)

M. Srinivasulu Reddy and Another Vs. The Station House Officer, Vijaya ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-10-2016

..... notification under the wakf act as on the date of the complaint and the material on record falsifies the said basis. therefore, the prosecution against the petitioners is undoubtedly a patent abuse of process of law. this court also finds force in the case of the petitioners that the ingredients of the sections mentioned in the first information report are conspicuously ..... in the complaint does not show the subject property as a notified wakf property, as such, the very complaint which culminated in registration of the first information report is a patent abuse of process of law, as such, the f.i.r is liable to be quashed. it is also the case of the petitioners that the ingredients of the alleged ..... a patta land as evident from the undisputed and uncontroverted material available on record. 4.2. the prosecution launched against the petitioners is highly illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable and a patent abuse of process of law. 4.3. the subject property is not a wakf property nor the same is notified as such under the provisions of the wakf act and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 2016 (HC)

C. Malla Reddy Vs. The Authorized Officer, IDBI Bank Limited and Other ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-16-2016

..... ; (ii) movable property; (iii) any debt or any right to receive payment of money, whether secured or unsecured; (iv) receivables, whether existing or future; (v) intangible assets, being know-how, patent, copyright, trade mark, licence, franchise or any other business or commercial right of similar nature. section 13 is included in chapter - iii of the sarfaesi act, which dealt with enforcement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2016 (HC)

Telangana State Road Transport Corporation Rep. by its Joint Managing ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-14-2016

common judgment: (nooty ramamohana rao, j.) both these writ appeals are preferred by the telangana state road transport corporation and its officials under clause 15 of letters patent, calling in question the correctness of the judgment and order rendered on 07.08.2015 in writ petition nos.18451 and 21988 of 2015. the sole respondent in both these .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2016 (HC)

M/s. BSCPL Infrastructure Limited Vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-22-2016

..... resorting to the impugned action. therefore, the impugned action on the part of the respondents in seeking to restrain the petitioner from carrying on the quarrying operations is also a patent violation of the principles of natural justice. 18. yet an another vital aspect which renders impugned action invalid is that the grant of lease made in favour of the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 2016 (HC)

R.R. Chandraiah Vs. Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Ananthapur a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-21-2016

..... -instatement but not increments on reinstatement. it is a settled and well established proposition of law that the writ in the nature of certiorari can be issued when there is patent perversity and this court finds no such perversity in the impugned award. in this connection, it may be appropriate to refer to the judgment of the hon'ble supreme court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 2016 (HC)

M.A. Faheem Uddin Vs. Shaik Nayeem

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-04-2016

..... election petition, prosecuting abortive litigation. if the petition is allowed to be tried, the result at the conclusion of trial would be the same i.e. dismissal in view of patent defect in the petition which is incurable. acceptance of such request is nothing but allowing malicious abuse of process to waste valuable judicial time of court and parties to the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //