Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Page 10 of about 5,310 results (0.027 seconds)

Oct 30 2001 (TRI)

The Income Tax Officer, T.D.S. - Vs. Raj Television Network Ltd.,

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

..... of a literary, artistic or scientific work, including cinematography films or work on films, tape or other mens of reproduction for use in connection with radio or television broadcasting, any patent, trademark, design, or model, plan, secret formula or process, or for information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience; and (b) payments of any kind received as consideration for the use ..... dictionary, "royalty" was defined, inter alia as (a) payment by lessee to the owner of the land for privilege of working mine; (b) the amount paid to a patents for the use of his patent; (c) payment made to author for books, etc., sold. = as per chambers english dictionary, cambridge u.k., 'royalty' - has been defined as a payment made to oil ..... the income of the recipient chargeable under the head 'capital gains' for: i) the transfer of all or any rights (including the granting of a licence) in respect of a patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark or similar property; ii) the imparting of the any information concerning the working of, or the use of ..... foreign company for design and engineering equipment. amounts paid to foreign company under contract not "royalties". contract did not refer to any patent owned by supplier which the buyer was permitted to exploit. no transfer or licence of any patent, invention, model or design. no accrual of income to foreign supplier in india." "the term "royalty" normally cannotes the payment made by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 2006 (HC)

Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd., Rep. by Its Chairman and Chief Executiv ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2006(2)CTC97; (2006)2MLJ171

..... r. rajagopal v. m.p. chellamuthu and ors.) and : air1997sc113 (j.s. parihar v. ganpat duggar and ors.) and concluded that the letters patent appeal is maintainable.16. on going through the relevant provision, viz., section 19 of the contempts of courts act, the judgment of the supreme court ..... 15. aggrieved by the said directions, the respondent therein filed appeal in lpa. no. 18 of 2004, invoking clause 15 of the letters patent. a preliminary objection has been raised on behalf of the respondent in the appeal regarding maintainability of the appeal. on behalf of the appellant it ..... in 2005 4 lw 398 (s. arumuganainar v. jeenath roadways), wherein the division bench considered an identical issue, contended that the present letters patent appeals are maintainable. in that case, the appellant awarded a contract to the respondent for a period of two years in respect of three ..... light of the above provisions, it is the claim of the shareholders welfare association that the present appeals, invoking clause 15 of the letters patent are not appropriate.13. mr. a.l. somayaji, learned senior counsel for the appellant bank by drawing our attention to the recent decision ..... raman andmrs. nalini chidambaram, leonard senior counsel for the respondents.9. at the foremost, an objection was raised regarding the maintainability of the letters patent appeals. according to the learned senior counsel for the respondents, inasmuch as the order under challenge was passed in a contempt petition filed under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2014 (HC)

C.Annadurai Vs. 1.P.Durai ..

Court : Chennai

..... .the thasildar, manamadurai taluk, sivagangai district. 6.baskaran 7.rajesh kumar ... respondents 2 to 7/ respondents 1 to 4, 6 & 7 prayer : writ appeal filed under section 15 of letters patents act to set aside the order dated 05.08.2014, passed in w.p.(md) no.15206 of 2012. !for appellant : mr.k.k.senthil ^for respondent no.1 : mr .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2007 (TRI)

Frontier Offshore Exploration Vs. the Dy. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

..... true that in some cases, a trading receipt may contain a fraction of the sum as taxable income, but in other cases such as interest, commission, transfer of rights of patents, goodwill or drawings for plant and machinery and such other transactions, it may contain a large sum as taxable income under the provisions of the act. whatever may be the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 1929 (PC)

The Corporation of Madras Vs. Spencer and Co., Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1930Mad55; 121Ind.Cas.849; (1929)57MLJ71

..... unreasonable within the meaning of lord russell's definition in that case, the court has power to interfere with its levy. we have been referred to another case, institute of patent agents v. lockwood (1894) a.c. 347 in which lord herschell, when dealing with the rules framed by the board of trade under the ..... patents, designs and trade marks act, 1888, which fixed a certain fee, in the course of his judgment observed:i confess that it seems to me, if there were any power .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 1906 (PC)

Manavala Chetty (Accused) Vs. Emperor

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1906)ILR29Mad569

..... offence under the section. the argument that it had not been shown that pears had acquired a trademark, in the sense in which the word is used in the english patents, designs and trademarks acts, in the design which is printed on the box in which the soap was sold, is beside the point. under section 478 of the indian penal ..... more than three offences at one time could be regarded as an error, omission or irregularity within the meaning of section 637 but whether, under article 26 of the letters patent the court had power to adopt the course which was taken in that case.9. i am of opinion that the conviction in the present case was bad and must .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 1934 (PC)

King-emperor Vs. Ramanuja Aiyangar

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1935)68MLJ1

..... of their admissibility. the matter is brought to my attention by a certificate granted by the learned advocate-general under clause 26 of the letters patent of this high court on being moved by the prisoner raising the question of the admissibility in evidence of these answers stating that in his ..... may straightaway be dismissed without any further consideration of the merits of the case. having regard to the terms of clause 26 of the letters patent, no other conclusion is possible. if this conclusion is sound in law, the question whether the advocate-general's certificate is competent should be ..... on which alone they could be considered by us. our powers are circumscribed, for we can only act in conformity with clause 26 of the letters patent. if there was no misdirection or other error as certified, the certificate was misconceived, and we have no power to interfere'. in the same case ..... law which require further consideration in the judgment of the advocate-general.35. it will be observed that under clause 26 of the letters patent a certificate to review a decision by the high court exercising original criminal jurisdiction can be granted by the advocate-general if in his judgment ..... a full bench of seven judges was formed to consider this preliminary objection of the learned crown prosecutor.5. the relevant clauses of the amended letters patent are clauses 25, 26 and 41. the marginal note of clause 25 reads 'no appeal from high court exercising original jurisdiction - court may reserve .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 1940 (PC)

Venkateswara Sarma, Styled Gnanasivacharia Swamigal, Matathipathi and ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1941)1MLJ644

..... were used and what was the object appearing from those circumstances which the person using them had in view.39. in eastman photographic materials co. ltd. v. comptroller-general of patents, designs and trade marks (1898) a.c. 571 lord halsbury said:. to construe the statute now in question it is not only legitimate but highly convenient to refer both to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 1999 (HC)

East India Ceramics and ors. Vs. Labour Officer (Conciliation) and anr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2000)IIILLJ1392Mad

..... cannot be issued to a court or an inferior tribunal for an error of law unless the error makes it go outside its jurisdiction (see reginaa v. comptroller general of patents and design 1953 2 w.l.r. 760, and parisienne basket shoes proprietary, ltd. v. whyte 59 c.l.r. 369). a clear distinction must, therefore, be maintained between want .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 1998 (HC)

S. Laxmanan and anr. Vs. Jayant Rajan

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1999)1MLJ387

..... may not be sufficient to establish the conversation of the parties. the telephone bill has been relied upon by the respondent to establish that he made the calls to his patents^ in-law. it is not clear as to whether he made the calls or the deceased made the calls to her parents. it is more probable that the deceased might .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //