Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Page 87 of about 5,310 results (0.042 seconds)

Jan 10 2012 (HC)

Mukanchand Bothra @ Mayavaram Bothra Vs. Kulwant Singh

Court : Chennai

..... immovable property, situated outside the jurisdiction of the original side of this court and the present suit is for land coming within the scope of clause 12 of the letters patent of this court and hence this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit. therefore, we do not find any reason to different with the conclusion arrived at by the ..... bench, in the above decision, held that the suit involves title to the property and the suit is for land coming within the scope of clause 12 of the letters patent and the suit properties being situated outside the jurisdiction of this court, the leave granted earlier was rightly revoked by the learned single judge. 9. applying the ratio of the ..... to be revoked as prayed for in application no. 1818/87 since the suit is for land coming within the ambit of first part of clause 12 of the letters patent, and that the suit properties are situated outside the jurisdiction of this court. the fourth defendant in the case on hand has to convey title over the suit property to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 2012 (HC)

Madurai K.K.Nagar Veetu. Vs. Madurai City Municipal.

Court : Chennai

..... of 2012 is filed under clause 15 of letters patent against the order dated 18.1.2012 made in w.p.(md) no.6922 of 2008 on the file of this court.writ petition in w.p.(md) no.5396 ..... w.p.(md) no.3332 of 2006 on the file of this court.writ appeal in w.a.(md) no.234 of 2012 is filed under clause 15 of letters patent against the order dated 16.12.2011 made in w.p.(md) no.410 of 2012 on the file of this court.writ appeal in w.a.(md) no.383 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 2013 (HC)

First Choice Food Products Vs. N.A.Thangarajan and Sons

Court : Chennai

..... .s.a.no.53 of 2013: this original side appeal under order xxxvi rule 9 of original side rules read with clause 15 of letters patent against the order of the learned single judge of this court dated 19.12.2012 in o.a.no.644 of 2012 in c.s.no.513 of 2012. for ..... .s.a.no.52 of 2013: this original side appeal under order xxxvi rule 9 of original side rules read with clause 15 of letters patent against the order of the learned single judge of this court dated 19.12.2012 in o.a.no.643 of 2012 in c.s.no.513 of 2012. o ..... in all the appeals o.s.a.no.51 of 2013: this original side appeal under order xxxvi rule 9 of original side rules read with clause 15 of letters patent against the order of the learned single judge of this court dated 19.12.2012 in o.a.no.642 of 2012 in c.s.no.513 of 2012. o .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2013 (HC)

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Vs. Bharti Airtel Ltd

Court : Chennai

..... appealable under clause 15 of the letters patent. the unreported judgment of this court followed the dictum of the apex court and pointed out that the order of interim stay passed by ..... finally determine the rights and obligations of the parties, would not be a ".judgment". for the purpose of filing appeal, provided under the letters patent. even herein, the apex court pointed out that if such interim order finally decides several rights and obligations of parties, the same would be ..... v. chunilal nanda) and upheld the writ appeal filed as regards the jurisdiction of this court under clause 15 of the letters patent. this court further considered the question on the interim order passed without assigning reasons. referring to a series of decisions, this court held that, to ..... the vital and valuable rights of the parties and cause serious prejudice to the party concerned, appeal would be maintainable under clause 15 of the letters patent. in so holding, this court referred to the decision of the apex court reported in 2006 (5) scc399(midnapore peoples' coop. bank ltd. ..... a provision, courts must desist from granting interim stay in such matters.9. contending that the writ appeals under clause 15 of the letters patent are maintainable as against the interim order passed, he submitted that writ appeal is a continuation of jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2014 (HC)

P.Nallusamy Vs. 1.The Commissioner,

Court : Chennai

..... petitioners. it, however, challenged the order passed by the single judge. the division bench of the high court ought to have dismissed the letters patent appeal by affirming the order of the single judge. the letters patent appeal, however, was allowed by the division bench and the judgment and order of the learned single judge was set aside. in our considered view .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2016 (HC)

S.V.R. Saroja and Others Vs. S.V. Matha Prasad

Court : Chennai

..... reason that those jurisdictions were governed by the procedure prescribed by the rules made in exercise of the powers of the chartered high courts under clause 37 of the letters patent. interestingly, section 652 of this act itself empowered the high courts to make rules , suggesting that consistency with the code was a sine qua non only when making rules for ..... days from the date of order of decision. the original side rules have been framed for regulating the suits and other legal proceedings in exercise of clause 37 of letters patent. therefore, the original side rules enjoy a special privilege carrying the status as the special rules which shall have precedence over the other laws including civil procedure code and in the event ..... ) 1 ctc 304 (iridium india telecom ltd., vs. motorola inco.,) and submitted that original side rules framed by the chartered high court in exercise of clause 37 of the letters patent is the special law, which would prevail over the general law, being civil procedural code. therefore, the appellate jurisdiction conferred upon this court under order 14 rule 12 of o .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2016 (HC)

Pondicherry Contract Carriage Owners' Association rep. by its Presiden ...

Court : Chennai

..... tax is compensatory or not. the test is to enquire whether the trade is having the use of certain facilities for the better conduct of its business and paying not patently much more than what is required for providing the facilities. 41. the concept so developed in automobile transport and the working test evolved therein continued to hold the field for ..... decision as to what a court has to see when a law is impugned as violative of article 301. the court has to see whether the impugned enactment facially or patently indicates quantifiable data on the basis of which the compensatory tax is sought to be levied. the act must indicate the benefit which is quantifiable or measurable and it must .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 2016 (HC)

Union of India, Rep by the Defence Estate Office, Chennai and Others V ...

Court : Chennai

..... of 2014filed under clause 15 of the letters patent challenging the order dated 25.10.2000 passed in w.p.nos.17417 and 17418 of 2000. w.p.no.9361 of 2006is preferred under article 226 of the constitution ..... (prayer: w.a.no.1640 of 2001filed under clause 15 of the letters patent challenging the order dated 23.04.2001 passed in w.p. no.19123 of 1998. w.a.no.1742 of 2013filed under clause 15 of the letters patent challenging the order dated 26.10.2009 passed in w.p. no.9123 of 2001. w.a.nos.333 and 334 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2016 (HC)

S. Malliga Vs. The Chief Regional Manager Chennai LPG Regional Office ...

Court : Chennai

..... of the court to set aside the award would be exercised only in cases where the court finds that the arbitral award is on the fact of it erroneous or patently illegal or in contravention of the provisions of the act. it is a well settled proposition that the court shall not ordinarily substitute its interpretation for that of the arbitrator ..... , therefore, the power of the court to set aside the award would be exercised only in cases where the court finds that the arbitral award is on facts erroneous or patently illegal or in contravention of the provisions of the act. it was further held that the arbitrator appointed by the parties is the final judge of the facts. the findings ..... (prayer: appeal filed under order xxxvi, rule 1 of the original side rules read with clause 15 of the letters patent against the fair and decreetal order dated 20.11.2009 in o.p. no. 2998/2011.) r. sudhakar, j. 1. this appeal is filed against the order of the learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2015 (HC)

The Principal, Vs. 1.Minor E.Ganesh, S/O.P.Elampooranan

Court : Chennai

..... , sngarathoppu 1st street, aruppukottai-626 101, virudhunagar district..respondents 2 to 6/ respondents 1 to 5 w.a.(md)no.1534/2014: writ appeal filed under clause 15 of letters patent, against the order of the learned single judge, dated 22.09.2014, made in w.p.(md)no.17017 of 2013. w.a.(md)no.1535/2014: writ appeal filed ..... under clause 15 of letters patent, against the order of the learned single judge, dated 22.09.2014, made in w.p.(md)no.9924 of 2014. !for appellant : mr.a.v.arun in both the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //