Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Page 9 of about 5,310 results (0.104 seconds)

Apr 20 2004 (HC)

The Rajarathna Mills Ltd., A. Kalayamputhur Vs. the Commercial Tax Off ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2004)3MLJ425

..... to transfer or succession, and to their capacity of being injured. property includes not only ownership, estates, and interests in corporeal things, but also rights such as trade marks, copyrights, patents, and rights in personam capable of transfer or transmission, such as debts.' 13. in ahmed g.h. ariff and others v. commissioner of wealth-tax, calcutta, : [1970]76itr471(sc) , the ..... tenements, goods or chattels which does not depend on another's courtesy: it includes ownership, estates and interests in corporeal things, and also rights such as trade-marks, copy-rights, patents and even rights in personam capable of transfer of transmission, such as debts; and signifies a beneficial right to or a thing considered as having a money value, especially with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1988 (HC)

The Proctor and Gamble Company Represented by Power of Attorney Holder ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1989)1MLJ36

..... that of the andhra pradesh high court in p. lakshmikantham v. ramakrishna pictures : air1981ap224 . that is not a case of interlocutory disposal. the letters patent appeals before the bench arose out of final disposals in which infringement of copyright was found and it was observed by the bench that there was no ..... appeal in a case which turned upon where the balance of convenience lay. after pointing out that grant of interlocutory injunctions in actions for infringement of patents is governed by the same principles as in other actions, lord diplock observed as follows: 'my lords, when an application for an interlocutory injunction to ..... neither party would be put to any irreparable damage or loss or prejudice. in that case, the suit was based on an alleged infringement of a patent and the defendant questioned the validity of the grant in favour of the plaintiff. the learned judge observed that an interim injunction will not be granted ..... patent ought not to have been granted under the provisions of section 26 of the patents and designs act, 1911, the court will not interfere by issuing a temporary injunction.10. in hubbard and ..... if the defendant disputes the validity of the grant and if the patent is new and its validity has not been established in a judicial proceeding till then and if it is endeavoured to be shown that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 2015 (HC)

R.Chandrajini Vs. 1. the Agricultural Production Commissioner/

Court : Chennai

..... & commercial commissioner, anna nagar, chennai - 40.3. the assistant director of agriculture (marketing), head post office road, palayamkottai, tirunelveli - 2. .. respondents/respondents writ appeal filed under section 15 of letters patents act against the order, dated 24.09.2012, made in w.p.(md)no.12443 of 2012. !for appellant :mr.m.kalyanasundaram senior counsel for m/s.vairam & william associates .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2015 (HC)

V.Sethuraman Vs. 1.The State Rep.By

Court : Chennai

..... the definition clause but shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in the act. shall have the same meaning as the expression ?.proceedings?. occurring in section 77 of the patents act.?. (viii)in 2010 (2) supreme 651 [supreme paper mills ltd., vs. asst.commissioner, commercial taxes calcutta & ors.]. it is held that ?.interpretation of statutes - it is a well settled ..... commissioner, usilampatti panchayat union, usilampatti, madurai district. .. respondents/respondents 5.t.r.palpandi (r5 impleaded vide order dated 07.08.2014) .. respondent writ appeal filed under clause 15 of letters patent against the order dated 22.01.2014 passed in writ petition(md)no.11223 of 2013 by this court. !for appellant : mr.g.ethirajulu ^for rr ?. 1 to 4 : mr .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2013 (HC)

Ammini Karnan Vs. Intellectual Property Appellate Board

Court : Chennai

..... the prayer that this hon'ble court may be pleased to issue a writ of declaration declaring chapter xi of the trade marks act, 1999 and chapter xix of the patents act, 1979, as ultra vires articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 50, 245 of the constitution of india as violative of the basic structure of the constitution and hence void .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2006 (TRI)

Rane Brake Linings Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Reported in : (2007)107TTJ(Chennai)475

..... that the learned cit(a) has correctly confirmed the disallowance of depreciation. section 32 of the it act, 1961 which deals with allowance of depreciation reads as under: (ii) know-how, patents, copyrights, trademarks, licences, franchises or any other business or commercial rights of similar nature, being intangible assets acquired on or after the 1st day of april, 1998; owned, wholly or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2016 (HC)

The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government, Education ...

Court : Chennai

(prayer: appeal filed under clause 15 of the letter of patents act against the order dated 21.11.2014 in w.p.no.23713 of 2014) petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india to issue a writ of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 2013 (HC)

Shrishti Digital Solution Vs. Additional Commissioner of Customs

Court : Chennai

..... : dgft may, through a notification, adopt and enforce any measure necessary for: (a) protection of public morals; (b) protection of human, animal or plant life or health; (c) protection of patents, trademarks and copyrights, and the prevention of deceptive practices; (d) prevention of use of prison labour; (e) protection of national treasures of artistic, historic or archaeological value; (f) conservation of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2014 (HC)

1.The Principal Director, Vs. G.Gurusamy

Court : Chennai

..... . vs. g.gurusamy ... respondent in w.a.(md) no.1017/2014 s.kaliappan ... respondent in w.a.(md) no.1018/2014 prayer : writ appeals filed under section 15 of letters patents act to set aside and revise the order, dated 04.04.2013, made in w.p.(md)nos.3115 and 3116 of 2012 and allow the writ appeals. !for appellants .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 2012 (TRI)

B. Suvarama Phani Vs. the Chairman / Managing Director, Miot Hospitals ...

Court : Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

..... reports were still awaited. he allowed the patient to go home asking him to come back with all the investigation reports and for the time being, taking into account the patents clinical history he made a provisional diagnosis of infective hepatitis and described broad spectrum antibiotics and other drugs and the patient was asked to come back for review. he advised ..... records and when there is reliable and cogent evidence on record to substantiate the negligence of the opposite parties, we need not go in search of experts evidence. it is patently evident that there has been negligence and deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties 1 and 2 right from the beginning till the end, throughout the process .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //