Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Page 99 of about 5,310 results (0.039 seconds)

Dec 07 2007 (HC)

Eastern Trading Company, Vs. Kalpana Lamps and Components Ltd. and S. ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)3MLJ680

..... . however, we do not find any ground to uphold the contention of the appellant herein that the award was unsustainable on grounds of limitation and hence the same suffers from patent illegality.19. it may also be noted that the arbitrator had rightly considered the balance sheet as a whole and reduced the outstanding amount payable by the respondents to the ..... be set aside if it is contrary to (a) fundamental policy of indian law; (b) the interests of india; (c) justice or morality; or (d) if it is patently illegal or arbitrary. such patent illegality, however, must go to the root of the matter. the public policy violation, indisputably, should be so unfair and unreasonable as to shock the conscience of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 2011 (HC)

Mr.S.Anand @ Akash Vs. Ms.Vanitha Vijaya Kumar and anr.

Court : Chennai

..... to entertain the above original petition. moreover, in view of section 3 of the guardians and wards act, 1890, the jurisdiction of this court under clause 17 of the letters patent is saved. therefore, the remedy of seeking a modification of the order of the family court, secunderabad, lies only before this court, especially after the refusal of the family court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 2012 (HC)

K.P.Perumal Vs. the Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment.

Court : Chennai

..... appointing authority in the case of petitioner is the managing director. where show cause has been issued by the board of directors, which is appellate authority, therefore, impugned notice is patently without jurisdiction, as it takes away the right of petitioner to file appeal. in support of this contention, learned senior counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the judgment of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2012 (HC)

R.Vikram Singh Rajah Bonsle Vs. V.S.Jagannathan

Court : Chennai

..... possession of the land, it will be a suit for land.13.the interpretation of expression suit for land or other immovable property occurred in clause 12 of the letters patent, came before the division bench of this court on reference, in the case in southern petrochemical industries corporation ltd. v. durga iron works and three others (1995 (ii) ctc 602 ..... performance of the contract to execute and register a lease with alternative claims for damages is not a suit for land within the meaning of clause 12 of the letters patent.15. from the above discussion it follows that a suit for land is a suit in which the relief claimed relates to title to or delivery of possession of land ..... doss (air 1929 madras 721). justice mukherjea perceived: (air p. 119, para 142) it seems to me fairly clear that the expression suit for land occurring in clause 12 letters patent, means a suit which is instituted with the object of establishing claims regarding title to the property or possession of it. whether or not possession is claimed, if title to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2012 (HC)

Dr.R.Kannapiran Vs. the Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... the findings of the disciplinary authority to the effect that the main charge held to have been proved against the delinquent officer, namely, the petitioner herein, is nothing but a patently erroneous and perverse finding.11. now coming to the second part of the charge to the effect that the petitioner herein had produced the case sheet belatedly on 28.05 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2012 (HC)

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. P.Thangapandian

Court : Chennai

..... under clause 15 of the letters patent against the order dated 27.06.2011 passed in w.p.(md)no.4864 of 2011 on the file of this court.common judgmentr.banumathi,j1. being aggrieved by the ..... .2011 passed in w.p.(md)no.2989 of 2011 on the file of this court.writ appeal (md)no.364 of 2012 filed under clause 15 of the letters patent against the order dated 27.06.2011 passed in w.p.(md)no.2888 of 2011 on the file of this court.writ appeal (md)no.367 of 2012 filed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2012 (HC)

The Indian National Trust for Architectural and Cultural Heritage (int ...

Court : Chennai

..... located behind. developed in 1893, these workshops, which contained a lathe, a turning shop for survey instruments and an electroplating facility, were all run by state-of-the art 'mansfield patent oil-gas apparatus'. the exterior of the building has undergone considerable change from when it was first built. once walled in with no openings to the exterior, a projecting canopy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 2012 (HC)

P.Fancy Suganthi Bai. Vs. the Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

..... was given to be petitioner's father during his service time period, after his retirement, the sidco residential quarters cannot be claimed by the petitioner because of the latent and patent fact that g.o.ms.no.128 (housing and urban development department), dated 24.03.1997, is concerned with the labour tenements. the labour tenements are allotted on rental basis .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 2012 (HC)

The Inspector General of Police and Others Vs. K. Natarajan (Died) and ...

Court : Chennai

..... of compulsory retirement into that of reinstatement of applicant etc., and more elaborately referred to in earlier paragraphs, in our consider opinion, does not suffer from any material irregularity or patent illegality, warranting interference in the hands of this court. 36. in view of the fact that the first respondent /applicant expired on 19.12.2005, appellants are directed to issue ..... the respondent were to be filed in the high court it would have been termed, properly speaking, as a writ of prohibition. a writ of prohibition is issued only when patent lack of jurisdiction is made out. it is true that a high court acting under article 226 is not bound by the technical rules applying to the issuance of prerogative ..... in government of tamil nadu and another vs. a. rajapandian ((1995) 1 supreme court cases 216 and at page 217), it is held as follows: the administrative tribunal fell into patent error in reappreciating and going into the sufficiency of evidence. it has been authoritatively settled by string of authorities of the supreme court that the administrative tribunal cannot sit as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 07 2012 (HC)

R. Sankarasubbu Vs. the Commissioner of Police Egmore Chennai and Othe ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2013(1)CTC1; 2013(1)MLJ(Crl)1; 2013(1)LW(Cri)1

..... eyes and ears to the controversy which had shocked the lawyer fraternity in the region. for the reasons best known to it, the high court became wholly oblivious to the patent facts on the record and failed to perform the duty entrusted to it under the constitution. after giving our thoughtful consideration to the facts and circumstances of this case, we .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //