Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Year: 1896 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.032 seconds)

Aug 25 1896 (PC)

Sankaran Vs. Raman Kutti and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-25-1896

Reported in : (1897)ILR20Mad152

..... , therefore, set aside the order of the subordinare judge and restored that of the district munsif.4. against this order the plaintiff now appeals under section 15 of the letters patent.5. a preliminary objection is raised that, as mr. justice parkelvs order was passed under section 588, civil procedure code, such order is final under the last clause of that section, and ..... v. imrat i.l.r. 3 all. 675 spankie, j., dissenting, it has also been so decided by a bench of this court in rothandaramasami naidu v. krishnasami naicken letters patent appeal no. 35 of 1894 unreported. we see no sufficient reason for dissenting from these authorities.8. the result is that the order now appealed against must be regarded as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 1896 (PC)

Seshagiri Rau and ors. Vs. Rama Rau and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-23-1896

Reported in : (1896)ILR19Mad448

1. we agree with the learned judge in the construction he has placed on clause 12 of the letters patent. no portion of the immoveable property is situated in madras and therefore leave to sue in the high court could not be granted. the appeal is dismissed with costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 1896 (PC)

Seeni Chettiar Vs. Santhauathan Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-12-1896

Reported in : (1897)ILR20Mad58

..... heard before shephard and best, j.j., and those learned judges disagreed in the conclusion they arrived at; and in consequence of best, j., having left the court, the letters patent appeal had to be heard before three other judges.2.the principal point in dispute was whether the yadast, dated 1st january 1891,created an interest in immoveable property, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 1896 (PC)

Venganayyan and ors. Vs. Ramasami Ayyan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-26-1896

Reported in : (1896)ILR19Mad422

1. no appeal is allowed by law in this case.

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //