Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Year: 1940 Page 1 of about 30 results (0.053 seconds)

Dec 17 1940 (PC)

Venkateswara Sarma, Styled Gnanasivacharia Swamigal, Matathipathi and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-17-1940

Reported in : (1941)1MLJ644

..... were used and what was the object appearing from those circumstances which the person using them had in view.39. in eastman photographic materials co. ltd. v. comptroller-general of patents, designs and trade marks (1898) a.c. 571 lord halsbury said:. to construe the statute now in question it is not only legitimate but highly convenient to refer both to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 02 1940 (PC)

N.K.R.M.N. Nagappa Chettiar and ors. Vs. Raja Srimanthu Muthu Vijaya R ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-02-1940

Reported in : AIR1940Mad532; (1940)1MLJ442

..... before wadsworth, j. he concurred with the decision of the learned district judge and dismissed the second appeal. leave was however given by the learned judge for preferring a letters patent appeal against his judgment and the appeal accordingly now comes before us.2. the notice in question is as follows:to,1 the district collector of ramnad and agent of ..... krishnaswami aiyangar, j.1. this is an appeal under the letters patent from the judgment of wadsworth, j., who confirmed on second appeal the decision of the district judge, ramnad, reversing the judgment of the subordinate judge of devakottah in o.s. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 1940 (PC)

Pachaiammal and anr. Vs. the Hindustan Co-operative Insurance Society ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-16-1940

Reported in : (1940)2MLJ688

..... decision in this appeal is whether the respondent company, the hindustan co-operative insurance society, limited, carries on business in madras within the meaning of clause 12 of the letters patent of this court. the first appellant is the widow and the second appellant is the daughter of one c.t. subramania mudali, who died on the 31st may, 1926. the ..... judge that the authorities are such that the court is bound to hold that the respondent company is not carrying on business in madras within the meaning of the letters patent. consequently the appeal must be dismissed with costs. the appellants could have sued in the subordinate court if they had so chosen and it is regrettable that that course was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 1940 (PC)

T.S. Rajan Vs. Mrs. Pankajammal and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-13-1940

Reported in : AIR1941Mad194; (1941)1MLJ186

..... refer in detail to the controversy, but it is manifest that here the question whether the present proceedings do constitute a suit for land within the meaning of the letters patent involves a substantial question of law.6. we consider that the appellant's contention that this matter should not be decided in a summary procedure should prevail. apart from the ..... the register of suits, but after the serial number the letter 'o.s.', shall be placed to distinguish it from plaints filed in ordinary-suits. clause 12 of the letters patent only gives the court jurisdiction in the case of suits 'for land' if the property is situated within the jurisdiction of the court. there has been much controversy in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 1940 (PC)

Pachaiammal and anr. Vs. Hindustan Co-operative Insurance Society, Ltd ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-16-1940

Reported in : AIR1941Mad270

..... which falls for decision in this appeal is whether the respondent company, the hindustan cooperative insurance society, ltd., carries on business in madras within the meaning of clause is, letters patent of this court. appellant 1 is the widow and appellant 2 is the daughter of one c.t. subramania mudali, who died on 31st may 1926. the deceased lived at ..... judge that the authorities are such that the court is bound to hold that the respondent company is not carrying on business in madras within the meaning of the letters patent. consequently the appeal must be dismissed with costs. the appellants could have sued in the subordinate court if they had so chosen and it is regrettable that that course was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 1940 (PC)

A.L.S.P.P.L. Subramanian Chettiar by Agent Narayanan Chettiar Vs. Muth ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-11-1940

Reported in : AIR1940Mad890; (1940)2MLJ170

..... to apply for a certificate or for the court to grant one.10. the order of wadsworth, j., was a final order of this court. clause 15 of the letters patent prohibits an appeal from an order passed by the court in the exercise of its revisional powers. the learned judge considered whether the matter involved a substantial question of law .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 1940 (PC)

Sri Kasikananda Gnanacharya Swamigal Vs. Saravana Perumal Pillai and a ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-09-1940

Reported in : AIR1941Mad319; (1941)1MLJ257

..... court, and their appeal was allowed by wadsworth, j., who, however, gave a certificate which has permitted of the filling of the present appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent.3. there is nothing on the record which shows the circumstances under which the appellant filed the appeal against the dismissal of his application under order 21, rule 97, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 1940 (PC)

V. Panchapakesa Aiyar Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Council ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-28-1940

Reported in : (1941)1MLJ310

..... appellant then appealed to this court and his appeal was heard by wadsworth, j., who agreed with the subordinate judge, but gave a certificate under clause 15 of the letters patent which has permitted the present appeal to be filed.3. wadsworth, j., was of the opinion that the suit did not lie ' because the electoral rules provide a special agency .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1940 (PC)

K.A. Srinivasa Ayyangar Vs. S. Ramanujachariar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-13-1940

Reported in : (1941)1MLJ322

..... festival is in them, but this the thengalais strenuously deny. the effect of the decree is in dispute in the present suit, but for the purposes of deciding this letters patent appeal it is not necessary to consider this matter as the appeal only relates to a question of limitation. if the appellant succeeds in establishing his contention, that the suit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 1940 (PC)

Damaraju Venkatarayudu Vs. T. Narayanayya and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-21-1940

Reported in : AIR1941Mad430; (1941)1MLJ349

..... , and he accordingly allowed the appeal and restored the decree of the district munsif. the first defendant, who was the first respondent in the second appeal has preferred this letters patent appeal in pursuance of the leave granted to him by the learned judge.3. the subordinate judge has found that the disputed property did not form part of venkatanarasimhayya's .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //