Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Year: 1953 Page 1 of about 51 results (0.038 seconds)

Feb 25 1953 (HC)

Madura Municipality Represented by the Municipal Commissioner Vs. P.M. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-25-1953

Reported in : AIR1954Mad454

..... without satisfying the condition contained in section 23 cannot be disputed.in -- 'dorman long & co. ltd. v. jagadeeschandra mahindra', 62 cal 596 (z5) the complaint was that the controller of patents had refused two applications for the summoning of two witnesses and it was contended that the controller had acted without jurisdiction in refusing to issue sub-penas to witnesses. a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 1953 (HC)

The Masulipatam Municipal Council Represented by the Commissioner, Hav ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-04-1953

Reported in : AIR1953Mad864; (1953)1MLJ536

..... to charge for the water on the basis that it was supplied for trade purposes. affirming the decision of the court of appeal in -- 'metropolitan water board v. colley's patents ltd.'. (1911) 2 k b 38 (d), the house of lords held that the board was entitled to charge for the water supplied only as for water supplied for 'domestic .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 1953 (HC)

A.R.V. Achar Vs. Madras State Represented by the Secretary, Local Admi ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-04-1953

Reported in : AIR1954Mad563; (1954)IMLJ102

..... respondent is a. m. m. murugappa chettiar who was elected to the seat reserved for the nattu kottai nasarathars' association. the petitioner who is also the appellant in the letters patent appeal) challenges the validity of his election mainly on the ground that the reservation of the seat for the said association offends articles 14 and 15 of the constitution. in ..... and the two writ petitions were heard together and can toe disposed of by a common judgment. the letters patent appeal is against the judgment of subba rao j. in w. p. no. 568 of 1952. the appellant filed that application for the issue of appropriate write, orders and directions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 1953 (HC)

K.V. Govindarajulu Mudaliar Vs. Devar and Co.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-06-1953

Reported in : AIR1954Mad248; (1953)2MLJ525

1. this is an appeal against the order of somasundaram j. transferring a suit on the file of the court of the district munsif of chittoor to the file of the district munsif, kozhikode. the appeal purports to be under clause 15 of the letters patent. it has been decided by the supreme court recently that an order transferring a suit from one court to another is not a judgment within the meaning of clause 15: see -- 'asrumati debi v. kumar rupendra deb', (a).2. the decision in -- 'krishna reddi v. thanikachala', air 1924 mad 90 (b) on which reliance was placed by counsel for the appellant must be deemed to have been overruled by this decision of the supreme court. the appeal is therefore incompetent and is dismissed. no costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1953 (HC)

Dandigunta Venkataramaiah (Minor) and anr. Vs. Dandigunta Audinarayana ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-02-1953

Reported in : AIR1953Mad929; (1953)2MLJ177

rajamannar, c.j.1. for a disposal of this appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent against the judgment of panchapakesa ayyar j. dismissing a second appeal, s. a. no. 255 of 1946, it is sufficient to state the following facts :in execution of a decree .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 1953 (HC)

Chinnadorai Alias Loganathan (Minor by Guardian P. Ramaswami Pillai) V ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-04-1953

Reported in : AIR1954Mad642; (1954)IMLJ100

..... present appeal is incompetent. even otherwise, we have no hesitation in holding that the order in question is not a judgment within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent. the order did not put an end to the suit, but had allowed the suit to proceed in its usual course towards a final decree.3. the appeal is therefore ..... (b) it was held by a bench of this court (muthuswami aiyar and parker jj.) that clause 15 of the letters patent is controlled fay section 629 of the then civil procedure code (corresponding to order xlvii, rule 7 of the present code), and therefore an appeal is not maintainable against an order rejecting ..... appellant that in spite of the express provision in order xlvii, ruls 7, the order in question would be a "judgment" within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent as interpreted by the full bench in -- 'tuljaram rao v. alagappa chettl', 35 mad 1 (a) and that therefore an appeal would lie. in -- 'achayya v. ratnavel', 9 mad 253 ..... 1. this is an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent against an order of rajagopalan j. dismissing an application by the appellant for review of the order made by him on 26th april 1950 directing a preliminary decree for partition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1953 (HC)

Minakshi Mills, Ltd. Vs. the Labour Appellate Tribunal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-06-1953

Reported in : (1953)ILLJ326Mad

..... vested in it by not deciding on essential question which arose for determination or to find out if its decision is totally vitiated by a completely unfounded assumption or a patent error. but are there any such grounds which could enable us to issue an appropriate writ or order quashing or setting aside the decision of the appellate tribunal in whole ..... 1. this is an appeal by the minakshi mills, ltd., madurai, under clause 15 of the letters patent against the, judgment of subba rao, j., dismissing an application made by the appellant for the issue of a writ of certiorarai to call for the records and proceedings relating .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 1953 (HC)

Aravala Chinapapinaidu and ors. Vs. Imperial Bank of India, Vizianagar ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-17-1953

Reported in : AIR1954Mad273

..... agriculturist if the debts or liabilities are due to a corporation, formed in pursuance of art act of parliament or of any special indian law, or royal charter, or letters patent. we are asked to say that the imperial bank is a corporation formed as a result of a special indian law and any debt to the imperial bank would therefore .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 1953 (HC)

Indian Tobacco Corporation by Its Managing Partner, N. Krishnaswami an ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-17-1953

Reported in : AIR1954Mad549; (1954)IMLJ429

1. these four appeals preferred under clause 15 of the letters patent against the common judgment of subba rao j. disposing of jour applications under article 226 of the constitution of india involve the same point and may be disposed of together. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 1953 (HC)

Liberator Press and Rangaswami Vs. State of Madras and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-18-1953

Reported in : (1954)ILLJ301Mad

..... court cannot lay down rules for the admission of advocates who alone will be permitted to represent the suitors before them. on the other hand the clauses in the letters patent granted to the chartered high courts to which reference was made earlier in this judgment clearly confer on the high courts the power to virtually prevent even qualified persona other .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //