Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Year: 1961 Page 1 of about 31 results (0.032 seconds)

Oct 06 1961 (HC)

issardas and Vs. Hair and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-06-1961

Reported in : AIR1962Mad458

..... the supreme court conferred under the letters patent. the authoritative pronouncement of the judicial committee in the parlakimedi case was that the writ jurisdiction of the madras high court was confined to its ordinary ..... 's bench in england could not exercise jurisdiction in respect of orders of subordinate civil courts. the high court of madras, formed under the letters patent of 1862, which took the place of the supreme court in respect of the writ jurisdiction, has no further or greater powers than that of ..... courts of calcutta, madras and bombay in the exercise of their local jurisdiction.'it must be conceded that the high courts constituted by the letters patent of 1862 were inheritors of the jurisdiction of the pre-existing supreme courts, in the respective territories and they come to be invested with powers and ..... , there is nothing. else in the act of 1861 to confer the power.their lordships make a significant reference to the terms of the letters patent of 1861 which do not refer to the prerogative writs. viscount simons observes at page 164-:'on the other hand, the parties are not subject ..... 1797. the recorder, sir thomas strange became in 1800 the first chief justice of the new supreme court of madras. clause 47 of the letters patent of 1800 is in these terms:'and to the end that the court of requests,-and the court of quarter sessions erected and established at madras .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 1961 (HC)

S. Narayana Doss (Died) and anr. Vs. Arumugathammal and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-18-1961

Reported in : AIR1962Mad259

..... . a. no. 73 of 1955 in this court, and subrahamanyam, j., confirmed the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court but granted leave to appeal under the letters patent. this letters patent appeal has therefore been preferred by the plaintiff.(4) the material portion of ex. a-1 conferring the bequests in favour of the daughters is as follows:in order ..... subrahmanyam, j., that shanmugathammal the plaintiff's wife did not take an absolute estate under the will and that therefore the plaintiff must fail.(15) in the result, the letters patent appeal fails and is dismissed with costs.(16) appeal dismissed. ..... (1) this is a letters patent appeal against the judgment of subrahamnyam, j., in s. a. no. 73 of 1955, on the file of this court, confirming the judgment and decree in a. s. nos. 88 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 1961 (HC)

Mohammad HussaIn and anr. Vs. Ganga Naicken Alias Gangama Naicken and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-09-1961

Reported in : AIR1962Mad264

(1) this is an appeal under the letters patent from the judgment of ramaswami, j, in cmsa no. 102 of 1957 with his leave. it arises in the execution of the decree passed in o. s. no. 128 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 1961 (HC)

C. Ekambara Mudaliar Vs. Sivasankara Mudaliar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-01-1961

Reported in : (1962)1MLJ200

..... m.l.j. 195 : i.l.r. mad. 254. that decision referred to certain earlier proceedings and stated that no notice was necessary to the respondents before deciding a letters patent appeal against an order declining to grant leave to appeal in forma pauperis. in view of that decision, we are now of opinion that no notice need be taken by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 1961 (HC)

N.P.S.N. Ramiah Nadar and ors. Vs. N.K.R. Amirtharaj

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-10-1961

Reported in : AIR1962Mad163

..... the respondent on the ground that the order of the learned judge does not amount to a judgment within the meaning of the term in cl. 15 of the letters patent.(4) in order to appreciate the contention, it is necessary first to ascertain the scope of s. 237 of the act. that section provides for investigation of the company's ..... under the provisions of s. 237 of the indian companies act will not amount to a judgment within the meaning of the term judgment in cl. 15 of the letters patent so as to entitle an aggrieved party to appeal therefrom.(8) the appeal fails and is dismissed with costs.(9) appeal fails

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 1961 (HC)

Moolchand Kevalchand Daga Vs. Kissindoss Girdhardoss

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-11-1961

Reported in : AIR1962Mad52

..... which falls for our decision, therefore, is whether sec. 39(2) of the arbitration act compels us to hold that clause 15 of the letters patent must have been intended to be amended and altered. it is clear that sec. 39 of the arbitration act is a section generally dealing with appeals ..... doubt an act passed by the governor general in legislative council.before we can hold that such an important provision as clause 15 of the letters patent has been amended and altered by necessary implication, we should be satisfied beyond doubt that the implication is so compelling that to hold other wise ..... 39 should prevail, with the result that sub-sec. (2) of sec. 39 would take away the right of appeal conferred by cl. 15 of the letters patent. this decision was followed by another division bench in south india co-operative insurance society ltd. v. bapiraju, . krishnaswami nayudu, j. dealing with this point, ..... an order staying or refusing to stay legal proceedings where there is an arbitration agreement (cl. (v)).the question is whether an appeal under the letters patent is maintainable against the order of ramaswami, j. it was not contended before us on behalf of the respondent that the order of ramaswami, j. ..... it was considered that decision required reconsideration. hence, this reference to a full bench.(2) the appeal purports to be filed under cl. 15 of the letters patent against the judgment of ramaswami, j. in c. m. a. no. 531 of 1954. that appeal was against an order of the city civil court, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1961 (HC)

State of Madras Through Secretary to Government Health Dept. Vs. T.K. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-13-1961

Reported in : AIR1963Mad14; [1962(5)FLR431]

..... have dilated on this aspect only as a matter of public interest, and as the arguments submitted before us touched upon this aspect also.10. under the circumstances, the letters patent appeal fails and is dismissed. the parties will bear their own costs throughout.

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 1961 (HC)

C. Ekambare Mudaliar Vs. Sivasankara Mudaliar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-01-1961

Reported in : AIR1962Mad263

..... re, ilr 53 mad 245 : air 1931 mad 198. that decision referred to certain earlier precedents and stated that no notice was necessary to the respondents before deciding a letters patent appeal against an order declining to grant leave to appeal in forma pauperis. in view of that decision, we are now of opinion that no notice need be taken by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1961 (HC)

M.S.V.V. Thayanayagi Achi Vs. C.T.C.T. Chidambaram Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-28-1961

Reported in : AIR1962Mad406

..... a sum of rs. 10,000/- with a charge therefor on the indian assets of the insolvent. the learned judge, however, gave a certificate under clause 15 of the letters patent, which has resulted in the present appeal.(4) on behalf of the appellant, mr. kesava aiyangar, contended as follows: the stridhanam moneys of the appellant were trust moneys in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 1961 (HC)

Chellammal Vs. Abdul Gaffoor Sahib and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-21-1961

Reported in : AIR1962Mad1

..... specific terms say so, he appears to have held that the full bench decision in : air1959mad96 (fb) overruled the decision in : air1956mad618 . the appeal was accordingly allowed. in the letters patent appeal, the bench before whom it came up for hearing made an order that the papers should be placed before the hon'ble the chief justice for disposal of the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //