Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Year: 1974 Page 1 of about 36 results (0.028 seconds)

Jul 03 1974 (HC)

Kannappa Chettiar Vs. Kuppuswami Naidu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-03-1974

Reported in : AIR1975Mad256

kailasam, j.1. the plaintiff who was unsuccessful in all the courts below is the appellant in this letters patent appeal. he filed the suit for a declaration and possession of the plaint b schedule property. the property originally belonged to one muthal naidu. defendants 1. 3. 5 and 7 ..... bangarammal, which would have the effect of conveying an absolute right on bangarammal,3, in the result, we agree with the view of the learned judge and dismiss the letters patent appeal. no order as to costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 1974 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. T.L. Dakshinamurthy

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-02-1974

Reported in : AIR1975Mad337; (1975)1MLJ269

..... this letter and the supervening express conduct of the plaintiff in having abstained from instituting an action to further his claim till this court pronounced its judgment in the letters patent appeal, obviously can be terminologically called a new contract entered into between the parties on which rights and obligations obviously would flow from one to the other. the question, ..... limitation which undoubtedly looms large in this case.7. mr. venkateswara rao, however, would refer to an apparent discrepancy in the decree of the learned judges who decided the letters patent appeal. in that judgment, the learned judges were of the view that the plaintiff would be entitled to future salary as a matter of course. they expressed in canny terms ..... rate. when the order of reinstatement was passed, the respondent was informed that regarding the payment of the amounts claimed under the decree, since the administration has filed the letters patent appeal, the result of the same may be awaited. the respondent was not satisfied apparently with this manner of reply and he pursued the matter again by making representations on ..... final decision regarding fixation of pay, seniority, claim for arrears, etc. the position and pay offered now are purely provisional and subject to review on the disposal of the letters patent appeal.' the result was that the plaintiff did not pursue his claim for arrears of salary either by making further representations to the defendants-appellants nor did he take any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 1974 (HC)

R. Ramanathan Chettiar, Through Power Agent Subbiah Chettiar Vs. K.R. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-16-1974

Reported in : (1974)2MLJ449

..... 1/3. of the amount claimed by the inamdar by way of arrears of rent. this amount was deposited by the tenants.4. subsequently, the high court allowed the letters patent appeals and quashed the order of the estates abolition tribunal as well as the notification made by the government under the estates abolition act. the basis of this decision was ..... in c. m. p. no. 10866 of 1950, challenging the view of the tribunal, but both these petitions were dismissed by this court. against the orders of dismissal, two letters patent appeals were filed. meanwhile, the inamdar-appellant had instituted suits against the respondents herein and other tenants in o. s. nos. 292 to 339 of 1957 on the file of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1974 (HC)

Nanak Chand ShaduraIn Vs. the Tinnelvely-tuticorIn Electric Supply Co. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-18-1974

Reported in : AIR1975Mad103

..... parties when the contract was entered into so as to exclude the jurisdiction of all the civil courts in the state of madras excepting that in the madras city. the patent ambiguity in the terms of the contract considered in the light of the situs of trade of the parties in this case prompts us to hold that it cannot be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1974 (HC)

Mount Mettur Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Ortha Pharmaceuticals Corporatio ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-21-1974

Reported in : AIR1975Mad74

..... appeal filed by the appellant against the order of the assistant registrar was disposed of by ganesan, j. it is against the dismissal of the appeal that the present letters patent appeal has been filed.2. the contest is between the trade name 'ortho-gynol' of the 1st respondent and the trade name 'utogynol' of the appellant. first, we will take ..... exercise his discretion judicially, and the judgment of the learned judge is also reversed as he erred in refusing to set aside the order of the assistant registrar. the letters patent appeal is allowed with cost as indicated above. ..... maharajan, j.1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the judgment of ganesan, j. in c. m. a. 278 of 1966 and arises under the following circumstances. the appellant which is the mount mettur pharmaceuticals .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 1974 (HC)

Pachiammal Vs. Veerappa thevar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-27-1974

Reported in : AIR1975Mad131; (1975)1MLJ39

..... question of father's father and maternal uncle inheriting the same cannot possibly arise.8. the learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the respondent in the letters patent appeals stated that they did not put forward the reasoning quoted above which found favour with the learned judge. in fact the learned counsel for the respondent, in whose favour ..... interest. it extends to all forms of property other than that."we are in respectful agreement with the view expressed above.7. the learned judge from whose judgment these letters patent appeals are preferred, while warning in two places that the question hag to be considered with reference to the language of the statute as well as the scheme of the ..... also the second defendant in o. s. no. 195 of 1963 on the file of the court of the district munsif of coimbatore, is the appellant in these two letters patent appeals. the interesting question that arises in these appeals is whether to a case of succession to the estate of a hindu male, who held the property as the last .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 1974 (HC)

Chandrasekaran Vs. Kunju Vanniar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-31-1974

Reported in : AIR1975Mad227

..... -bai, , which we do not think in any way affects the view that we have taken as to the effect of the related statutory provisions in the act. the letters patent appeal fails and it is dismissed. no costs.8. maharaian, j., in his opinion, has suggested that the matter will have to go back to the revenue divisional officer. but ..... in decreeing the suit. but in second appeal ramanu-jam, j., reversed the decree relying on prabhu v. ramdeo, , and dismissed the suit. but he granted leave. in the letters patent appeal kaila-sam, j. took the view that the respondents were not entitled to the statutory protection, while maharaian, j., took the opposite view.2. the tamil nadu cultivating tenants ..... 1. the letters patent appeal is posted before a full bench, because kailasam, j. and mahajan, j., differed on the question whether the tenants under a usufructuary mortgagee are entitled, after redemption of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 1974 (HC)

Velayudha Konar Vs. Kora Miah Sahib and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-04-1974

Reported in : AIR1974Mad355

..... executing court should do is to record that fact, namely, that the sale is void. that means, the part satisfaction recorded should also be treated as cancelled. accordingly, the letters patent appeal is allowed and the judgment and decree in c. m. s. a. no. 153 of 1966 are set aside and the order of the executing court, confirmed by the ..... 1. this appeal under the letters patent is against the judgment of venkataraman j. allowing c. m. s. a. no. 153 of 1966. the appellant before us is a mortgagee-decreeholder. after final decree in the mortgage .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 1974 (HC)

HussaIn Uduman Vs. Venkatachala Mudaliar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-07-1974

Reported in : AIR1975Mad8

..... the act. it is unnecessary for us to consider whether she could have acquired absolute title to s. no. 30/3. the subject-matter of the dispute in this letters patent appeal is only s. no. 60/1 and not s. no. 30/3. the third defendant has failed to make out that gomathiammal was in possession of s. no. 60 ..... maharajan, j.1. this letters patent appeal which is directed against the second appellate judgment of v. ramaswami, j. arises under the following circumstances: survey no. 60/1. which is the subject-matter of this appeal, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 1974 (HC)

Lakshmi Narayan Karva and ors. Vs. Satyanarayanan Khubchand Karva

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-11-1974

Reported in : AIR1975Mad112

..... the registration of the appellants' trade mark was made without sufficient cause and the entry has wrongly remained in the register and dismissed the appeal with costs. hence this letters patent appeal.5. section 56(1) of the trade and merchandise marks act. 1958, provides for application being made in the prescribed manner to a high court or to the registrar ..... varadarajan, j.1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the judgment of maharajan. j. in c. m. a. 151 of 1969, which was filed by the appellants against the order of the assistant registrar of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //