Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Year: 1977 Page 2 of about 23 results (0.026 seconds)

Mar 04 1977 (HC)

Muniammal Vs. Raja

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-04-1977

Reported in : AIR1978Mad103

..... , that decree dismissing the suit has been set aside by ananthanarayanan, j. (as he then was) and the case was remanded for fixing proper maintenance. this appeal came as letters patent appeal. a division bench consisting of s. ramachandra ayyar, c. j. and venkataraman, j. held that "notwithstanding the existence of a compromise decree under which a hindu wife agreed to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 1977 (HC)

Nestle's Products (India) Ltd. Vs. P. Thankaraja and Anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-29-1977

Reported in : AIR1978Mad336; (1978)1MLJ417

..... view most often quoted in this connection is that of the house of lords in the celebrated 'solio case' the eastman photographic materials company limited v. the comptroller general of patents, designs, and trademarks, (1898) ac 571. i quote the following observations of lord shand and lord herschell as laying down the proper guideline and approach as under;--lord shand: 'i .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 1977 (HC)

G. Balakrishnan and Brothers P. Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-23-1977

Reported in : [1978]41STC450(Mad)

..... authorising introduction of an error in the course of proceedings for rectification of another error. the fetters on the jurisdiction to rectify so as to confine the jurisdiction only to patent errors which did not involve any doubt or dispute will not apply to the consequential issues that flow from the application for rectification being accepted. the same result follows even .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 21 1977 (HC)

M.A.B. Mohd. Sultan Mohideen and ors. Vs. Official Trustee and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-21-1977

Reported in : (1978)1MLJ190

..... only the other beneficiaries barring the second defendant who has also become a legal representative of the first defendant after his death. ultimately, he dismissed the appeal. hence, the letters patent appeal. the same contentions are pursued before us by the learned counsel for the appellants.3. the madras buildings (lease and rent control) act, being a beneficial legislation, is intended .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 1977 (HC)

Ganeshmal Maggaji by His Power Agent Roopchand Maggaji Vs. the Central ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-11-1977

Reported in : (1978)1MLJ287

..... applicable. such inconsistent and inconceivable variations and consequences which result from no fault or omission or act of the licensee cannot be the basis for interpreting the provisions which are patently different one from the other. it is in such circumstances that recourse has to be had to the rule of harmonious construction. we will have to say in what circumstances .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1977 (HC)

S. Jabaperumal Vs. Central Bank of India, a Body Corporate Wholly Owne ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-13-1977

Reported in : (1978)1MLJ312

..... , or any debt due to any corporation formed in pursuance of an act of parliament (of the united kingdom) or of any special indian law or rayal charter or letters patent.the point to be examined is whether the central bank is a bank formed in pursuance of any special indian law. the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 1977 (HC)

C.V. Ramaswami Naidu and ors. Vs. C.S. Shyamala Devi and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-14-1977

Reported in : (1978)1MLJ505

paul, j.1. o.s.a. no. 81 of 1975 is an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent against the judgment and decree of the learned single judge on the original side of this court in c.s. no. 16 of 1972. a.s. no. 615 of 1973 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 1977 (HC)

V. Vs. S. Natarajan V. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-04-1977

Reported in : [1978]111ITR539(Mad)

..... for partition, there is no possibility of making a provision therein. we are, therefore, of the view that the answer to the questions raised in the present case are so patent that there is no need to direct the tribunal to state a case and refer the aforesaid questions for decision of this court. the petition is dismissed with costs. counsel .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 1977 (HC)

Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras-i Vs. Isthmian India Mar ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-24-1977

Reported in : [1978]113ITR570(Mad)

..... an indian company includes any income by way of royalty, commission, fees, or any similar payment received by it from a foreign company in consideration for the use of any patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process, or similar property right, or information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific knowledge, experience or skill made available or provided or agreed to be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 1977 (HC)

Doraiswami Vs. Rathnammal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-28-1977

Reported in : AIR1978Mad78; (1978)1MLJ456

..... comparison of her signature found in the will with that in the mortgage deed, the appellant has chosen to file an application for reception of additional evidence in this letters patent appeal. but we are of the view that in view of the provisions of order 41, rule 27 it is not possible to permit the appellant to adduce additional evidence .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //