Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 40 results (0.045 seconds)

Apr 16 1980 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu-ii Vs. Seshasayee Bros. P. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-16-1980

Reported in : (1981)20CTR(Mad)299; [1981]127ITR218(Mad)

..... sought the question that has been referred. 3. among the objects of the company as seen from the memorandum were the following : '3. (1) to purchase or otherwise acquire any patents, brevets and inventions, licences, concessions and the like conferring any exclusive or non-exclusive or limited right to use any invention or privilege, which may seem capable of being used .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1980 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu-v Vs. Lakshmi Card Clothing Man ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-19-1980

Reported in : [1984]149ITR712(Mad)

..... the licence granted under clause 3, i. e., right to manufacture and sell the card clothing and accessories on the basis of the foreign company's designs and manufacturing methods, patented or unpatented, and for the services rendered under clause 9, an annual payment of 6,000 francs had to be paid to the foreign company. it is significant to note ..... , the foreign company gives to the assessee the sole exclusive non-transferable right to manufacture and sell card clothing and accessories in certain territories on the designs and manufacturing methods patented or unpatented. under clause 9, the foreign company for a period of ten years has to forward to the assessee-company any new data, specifications, processes, revised and additional manufacturing ..... claimed.on appeal, the aac held that the consideration for the services in the shape of technical advice and for the grant of license to exploit the foreign company's patents in india is partly for services and partly in the nature of royalty and it is, therefore, on revenue account and qualified for deduction. on further appeal, the tribunal, after ..... , the kingdom of nepal and neighboring countries of india expect europe, card clothing and accessories as specified in para. (2) on the basis of graf's designs and manufacturing methods patented or unpatented. 9. during a period of ten years from the conclusion of this agreement, graf will forward from time to time to lakshmi any new data, specifications, processes, revised .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 04 1980 (HC)

Mohammed Khan Sahib Vs. Ali Khan Sahib and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-04-1980

Reported in : (1981)1MLJ402

..... the plaintiffs father and defendants' mother and they cannot be brushed aside just as a mere coincidence. the trial court's finding that in karaikal region there are many muslim patents having the same name as mentioned in exhibits a-2 and a-3 can-not be accepted as there is absolutely no evidence in support of that finding. it therefore .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 1980 (HC)

M. Arasan Chettiar and Ors. vs. S.P. Narasimhalu Naidu's Estate Trust, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-05-1980

Reported in : AIR1980Mad305; (1980)2MLJ303

..... the fact that the courts had granted stay, we grant the appellant in the letters patent appeal three months' time from this date to pay the price fixed by the court under section 9 (1) (b).as far as the civil revision petitions are concerned, we ..... 9 (2), then the suit or proceedings will proceed or any decree or order in ejectment that may have been passed therein shall stand.14. as far as the letters patent appeal no. 2 of 1980 is concerned, the date for the purpose of the third sentence in section 9 (1) (b) has been taken to be the date when the ..... court decided the minimum extent of the land for the convenient enjoyment by the tenant. in view of this, the letters patent appeal fails and is dismissed. the moment we have reached this conclusion, mr. m. srinivasan, appearing for the appellant in the letters ..... patent appeal, only wanted the fixation of time for payment of the amount, since, during the pendency of the further proceedings, he had obtained stay from the courts. having regard to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 1980 (HC)

The Official Receiver, Coimbatore Vs. S.A. Ramaswami Gounder and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-15-1980

Reported in : AIR1980Mad269

..... other respondent in s. a. 1606 of 1963, which was allowed by this court on 28-4-1977. aggrieved against the said judgment the petitioner purported to file a letters patent appeal before this court on the basis of leave granted by this court while allowing the second appeal. on the office pointing out that the, letters ..... patent appeal is not competent in view of section 100-a, c. p code as amended by central act 104 of 1976, the petitioner realised that he cannot maintain the appeal. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1980 (HC)

M. Muthayya Vs. Kamu Alias Kamala Ammal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-18-1980

Reported in : (1981)1MLJ107

..... directing the appellant to serve notice of appeal on the minor-respondent within a week. there was a subsequent petition for restoration of the suit which failed and the letters patent appeal against the dismissal of restoration petition was also dismissed. it was held that the whole appeal had failed for non-joinder of the minor-respondent who was a necessary ..... that if the appellant was then allowed to add the proposed respondent the result would be that the order in the miscellaneous judicial case as well as in the letters patent appeal would become nugatory and the entire proceedings would constitute mere waste of time, and that valuable rights had been acquired by the respondents and that they could not be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 1980 (HC)

Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Tamil Nadu-v Vs. Kamala Ganapathi Subraman ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-23-1980

Reported in : (1980)19CTR(Mad)209; [1981]127ITR175(Mad)

..... it was observed by the supreme court : 'prima facie it may appear somewhat strange that an order which was good and valid when it was made should be treated as patently invalid and wrong by virtue of the retrospective operation of the amendment act. but such a result is necessarily involved in the legal fiction about the retrospective operation of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 1980 (HC)

Somarajan and ors. Vs. Management of A.R.C. Engineering Works, Ambattu ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-18-1980

Reported in : (1981)IILLJ25Mad

..... )iillj58mad , the learned judge observed as follows : 'these observations are clearly applicable to the facts of the present case. we may further observe that in the present case, it is patent on the fact of the report of the enquiry officer as well as the impugned order of punishment, that the petitioner management did no awarding the punishment, take any account .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1980 (HC)

R.S.K. Chandrasekaran Vs. the Official Receiver, Madurai and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-15-1980

Reported in : AIR1981Mad235

..... and for consideration, and that therefore that question did not arise. it is the correct ness of this conclusion of the learned judge that is canvassed in the present letters patent appeal.3. section 38(2) of the provincial in solvency act provides for the vesting of the property in the official receiver on the making of an order of adjudication .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 1980 (HC)

L.M.L.L. Lakshmanan Chettiar Vs. V.A.R. Alagappa Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-18-1980

Reported in : AIR1981Mad338

..... properties covered by them etc., and about the mortgage being subsisting. we are clearly of opinion that the view taken by the subordinate judge on the question of limitation is patently wrong and manifestly opposed to law. the subordinate judge has failed to see that with the creation of the equitable mortgage the debt became a secured one and the two .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //