Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Year: 1990 Page 4 of about 39 results (0.035 seconds)

Nov 05 1990 (HC)

Vopak Pharmaceuticals Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-05-1990

Reported in : 1991(52)ELT377(Mad)

1. the petitioner is a manufacturer of patent and proprietary medicines and drugs licence obtained in drugs act. the petitioner claims to be a small manufacturer and had been claiming exemption from payment of excise duty or concessional .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 1990 (HC)

Workmen of Kempt (1) Ltd. (Represented by Kempt Employees Union, Throu ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-21-1990

Reported in : (1993)IIILLJ913Mad

..... necessarily to be followed before an order is made under that sub-section. the review contemplated by sub-section (5), which does not limit itself to the correcting of any patent and apparent error or clerical or arithmetical mistake, takes into its fold a fresh determination of the request of the employer or the workman, as the case may be, in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 1990 (HC)

S. Natarajan Vs. Shelly

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-10-1990

Reported in : II(1991)DMC217

..... recording the entire evidence, the trial court arrives at a conclusion that it had no jurisdiction, the petitioner would still be exonerated, for on facts, want of jurisdiction is not patent at this stage.14. the next important question to be adverted to, will be whether the respondent is a person aggrieved as contemplated under section 198 cr.p.c. section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 1990 (HC)

B.H.E.L. Ancillary Association Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-05-1990

Reported in : 1991(32)ECC316; 1990(49)ELT33(Mad)

..... of at all by the units in respect of the components manufactured by them, and it is too late in the day to make a suggestion on these lines which patently looks bona fides. we are in total agreement with the submission put forth by mr. sriram panchu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. the stand of the respondents 1 to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 1990 (HC)

Y. Mohamed and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-11-1990

Reported in : (1991)83MLJ1

..... the personnel belonging to those services would apply to the holders of the temporary posts in the office of the government pleader, high court, madras. these rules as such are patently arbitrary and hit by articles 14 and 16(1) of the constitution of india.12. as a result of our conclusions above, we hold that the posts created under g .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 1990 (HC)

Vishnudas Trading as Vishnudas Kishindas Zarda Factory Vs. the Vazir S ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-11-1990

Reported in : (1991)194MLJ1

venkataswami, j.1. these two appeals preferred under section 109(5) of the trade and merchandise marks act, 1958 (hereinafter called 'the act'), read with clause 15 of the letters patent, are directed against a common order of ramanujam, j., in a.a.o. nos. 582 and 583 of 1976, dated 11.9.1980.2. the related facts leading to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1990 (HC)

M.M.S. Investment Represented by Its Managing Director and ors. Vs. L. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-23-1990

Reported in : (1991)243MLJ1

..... the petition for implcading under order 1, rule 10, c.p.c. is not appealable order and even though the present appeal is filed under clause 15 of the letters patent, in view of the code of civil procedure, the said order is not an appealable one and as such it will merge with the order of appeal. according to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 14 1990 (HC)

Duraiswami and ors. Vs. Swaminathan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-14-1990

Reported in : (1990)2MLJ480

..... application of wrong tests or on the basis of conjectures and assumptions then a high court will be well within its rights in setting aside in a second appeal a patently erroneous finding in order to render justice to the party affected by the erroneous find. it is to be noted that first of all in the instant case it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 1990 (HC)

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Warehousing Corporation Vs. S.V. Uth ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-21-1990

Reported in : (1990)2MLJ534

..... date of the original order of dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement and shall continue to remain under suspension until further orders. 5. the implications of rule 17(e)(4) are patent from a mere reading of it. here is a case where by virtue of a decision of this court in w.a.no.536 of 1988 and w.p.no .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //