Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Year: 1999 Page 1 of about 57 results (0.032 seconds)

Oct 15 1999 (HC)

East India Ceramics and ors. Vs. Labour Officer (Conciliation) and anr ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-15-1999

Reported in : (2000)IIILLJ1392Mad

..... cannot be issued to a court or an inferior tribunal for an error of law unless the error makes it go outside its jurisdiction (see reginaa v. comptroller general of patents and design 1953 2 w.l.r. 760, and parisienne basket shoes proprietary, ltd. v. whyte 59 c.l.r. 369). a clear distinction must, therefore, be maintained between want .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 1999 (HC)

Mohammed Asif Vs. State Rep. by Additional Superintendent of Police, Q ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-29-1999

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC418

..... invoking the provisions of the criminal procedure code article 227 of the constitution as well as clause 29 of the letters patent act. the observation of the division bench does not mean that criminal procedure code which specifically provides for transfer of cases by the high court can be excluded and that in all ..... provisions with respect to judicial power of transfer under the code of criminal procedure as well as article 227 of the constitution of india and clause 29 of the letters patent act could always be exercised, as they have not been excluded specifically much less implicitly. the division bench thus held that the transfer of cases can be sought for by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 1999 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-07-1999

Reported in : [2000]243ITR459(Mad)

..... the machinery has been put together, the machinery cannot be maintained in the best possible way and repaired when occasion arises. no licence of any patent is involved. sub-clause (vi) and also (vii) of section 9(1) would have no application as the design was only preliminary to the ..... being' regarded as covering the design and engineering carried out by the supplier of the machinery abroad. there is no transfer or licence of any patent, invention, model or design. the design referred to in the contract is only the design of the equipment required to be manufactured by the ..... meet the special design requirements of the buyer. 13. the contract between the assessee and the manufacturer does not anywhere refer to any specific patent owned by the supplier which the buyer is permitted to exploit. all that the contract provides is an indemnity to the buyer, to protect ..... beingregarded as 'royalty'. 11. in a contract for the design, manufacture, supply, erection and commissioning of machinery which does not involve licence of the patent concerning the machinery, or copyright, of its design, mere supply of drawings before the manufacture is commenced to ensure that the buyer's requirements are ..... were also set out in the annexure to the contract. clause 30.1 provided that the contract price was deemed to include royalties, fees and patent, covering materials, articles, apparatus, devices, equipment or processes used in the work. it also provided that the purchaser was to be kept indemnified by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 1999 (HC)

Anugraha Jewellers Ltd. and anr. Vs. K.R.S. Mani and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-17-1999

Reported in : [2002]111CompCas501(Mad)

..... a month. one of the artisans also appeared before the commissioner and has stated about it. therefore, the commissioner report shows clearly that the allegations made by the respondents are patently false. the report of the commissioner does not support any prima facie case in favour of the respondents.24. the main accusation is that a sum of rs. 1.37 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 1999 (HC)

S. Mohammed Iqubal Vs. M. Padmanabhan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-30-1999

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC116; (1999)3MLJ330

..... the rent control appellate authority has rejected the claim of the landlord requiring the premises for his additional accommodation under section 10(3)(c) of the act. there is no patent error or perversity in approach seen in the conclusions arrived at by the rent control appellate authority and i see no valid or tangible reason to interfere with the well .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 28 1999 (HC)

Subramanian N. Vs. Collector and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-28-1999

Reported in : (2000)IILLJ913Mad

..... concerned, nothing has been done in a proper manner as per the expectations of law. the enquiry proceedings instituted in this case is nothing short of an enquiry suffering from patent errors of law and perversity in approach besides the whole proceeding getting vitiated on account of mala fides. hence, the dismissal order passed by the second respondent becomes liable only .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 1999 (HC)

Triad Trading Services Ltd., Chitra Towers, 332 Arcot Road, Kodambakka ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-30-1999

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC241; (1999)3MLJ546

..... to the sale of such article shall be of no effect for the purpose of limiting the right of a dealer to dispose of that articles without infringement of the patent or trade mark, as the case may be; provided that nothing in this section shall affect the validity as between the parties and their successors, of any term or condition ..... or calculated to be understood as the minimum price which may be charged on the resale of the goods in india. (3) this action shall apply to patented articles (including articles made by a patented process and articles made under any trade mark) as it applies to other goods and notice of any term or condition which is void by virtue of ..... of a licence granted by the proprietor of a patent or trade mark by a licensee under any such licence or of any assignment of a patent or trade mark, so far as it regulates the price at which articles produced or processed by the licensee or the assignee .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 1999 (HC)

A. Karuppiah Vs. B. Vaithianathan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-26-1999

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC741

..... and hence no interference has been warranted with the well considered and well merited judgment of the trial court. 43. in result, the above letters patent appeal succeeds and the same is allowed with costs throughout. the judgment and decree dated 30.6.1995 made in a.s.no. 249 of 1989 ..... go into the 'depth and length' of the same as done by the first appellate court. from the plain and simple language employed it is patently revealed in no uncertain terms that the ex.a.l agreement is nothing but a rent deed wherein the terms and agreements of lease have been clearly ..... had allowed the appeal and passed a decree as prayed for. in consideration of all these and in further consideration of the grounds of the letters patent appeal and upon hearing the learned counsel for both, the main points that arise for determination are: 1. whether the trial court had jurisdiction to ..... appellant herein. 12. during arguments, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant besides laying emphasis on the grounds as broughtforth in the memorandum of this letters patent appeal, would further contend that the questions that are to be decided by this court are (1) whether the defendant is the tenant within the meaning ..... .6.1995 passed by the appellate court in a.s.no. 249 of 1989, the defendant in the suit has come forward to prefer the above letters patent appeal on certain grounds, such as, (i) that the learned judge erred in holding that there is no relationship of landlord and tenant established under ex .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1999 (HC)

R.M.V. Karuppiah Ambalam Vs. Sr. Govinda Iyer and Two Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-23-1999

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC129

..... sufficient cause. the question urged by the petitioner's counsel will not amount to an indisputable question much less of law, not it can be construed as an obvious and patent mistake that could be seen by anyone without resorting to a process of reasoning. it can also be stated that when this court employed the word 'direction', it actually meant ..... . an error apparent on the face of records must be such as can be seen easily be one who reads it and it must be obvious and a patent mistake. anything which is not patent and obvious and which is something that can be established only by a process of reasoning and of which there may be considerably two opinions, cannot amount .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1999 (HC)

Haji Latif Gani Kachhi Vs. Sangishetty Ramulu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-28-1999

Reported in : (1999)3MLJ604

..... june, 18th and july, 10th 1896 rendered by the high court of justice chancery division in the matter of currie and company's application for a trade mark (reports of patent, design and trade marks cases (vol. xiii no. 40 page 681) wherein both marks contained the devise of a fighting cock and the words 'cock o' the north', but in .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //