Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Year: 1999 Page 3 of about 57 results (0.025 seconds)

Jul 26 1999 (HC)

Review Applicant: Mrs. Farida Shaukath Vs. Unit Trust of India, Madras ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-26-1999

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC736

..... , not yet materalised or fructified.17. in any event, review is by no means an appeal in disguise whereby an erroneous decision is reheard and corrected, but lies only for patent error. no mistake or error apparent on the face of my order dated 26.11.1998, made in 20884 of 1992, is brought to my notice, warranting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 1999 (HC)

A. Kesavan Vs. Madurai-kamaraj University, Rep. by Its Registrar, Madu ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-27-1999

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC151

..... the view that it is well settled that a certiorari will lie provided requisite grounds exist, although a right of appeal has been conferred by the statute. when injustice is patent and there is miscarriage of justice, technical objections cannot be considered at all. the revision arose out of an order upholding the obstruction making the decree inexecutable. the learned judge .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1999 (HC)

The Management of Cheran Transport Corpn, Coimbatore 43 and Another Vs ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-26-1999

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC500; (2000)IILLJ187Mad

..... faith, but in the colourable exercise of the employer's rights; (c) by falsely implicating a workman in a criminal case on false evidence or on concocted evidence; (d) for patently false reasons; (e) on untrue or trumped up allegations of absence without leave; (f) in utter disregard of the principles of natural justice in the conduct of domestic enquiry or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 1999 (HC)

V.K. Thyagarajan Vs. Syndicate Bank and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-02-1999

Reported in : [2000]100CompCas293(Mad); (2000)1MLJ47

..... directed transfer of the petition to the tribunal at an early date. the same is challenged in this revision.4. learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the impugned order is patently incorrect in view of section 22 of the act. learned counsel submitted that the application to set aside the ex parte decree passed by the civil court is maintainable before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1999 (HC)

State Bank of India and anr. Vs. Gulab Basha

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-19-1999

Reported in : [2000]100CompCas382(Mad); (1999)3MLJ539

..... fact the defendants by their negligence have honoured the cheque without even taking a cursory glance at the cheque, which would have brought to the knowledge of the defendants, the patent unusual features on the face of the cheque. the defendants are not protected where the customer's signature is forged. as a direct consequence of the illegal act of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 1999 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Needle Industries (India) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-22-1999

Reported in : [2000]245ITR556(Mad)

..... of raw materials, stores, etc., due to fire from the insurance company ?' 4. learned senior counsel, mr. s. v. subramaniam, for the revenue, submitted that the tribunal has committed a patent error in holding that the method of accounting and the entries in the books determined the character or scope of the receipt. it was also submitted by him that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 27 1999 (HC)

Ratna Cafe Vs. E.S.i. Corporation

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-27-1999

Reported in : (2001)ILLJ37Mad

..... the relevant materials on record and came to the right conclusion that the appellant is liable to pay contribution on all the heads, stated supra. i do not find any patent error of law or perversity of approach in the findings rendered by the court below, which warrants any interference by this court. that in the said circumstances, it is not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 1999 (HC)

Pandiyan Roadways Corporation Ltd. Vs. Principal Labour Court and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-23-1999

Reported in : [2000(85)FLR1]; (2000)ILLJ1147Mad

..... are necessary for this court, to interfere with such as, perversity in the approach of the labour court in so far as the decision arrived at by it or any patent errors of law or violation of natural justice or any failure of procedure so as to end up in failure of justice has been brought forth on the part of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 1999 (HC)

Management of Terrace Estate Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and a ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-10-1999

Reported in : (2000)IILLJ52Mad; (2000)1MLJ590

..... arrived at by the labour court in so far as the punishment is concerned, is a well considered and well merited one and, i am not able to see any patent error or perversity in approach so as to call for interference by this court. in these circumstances, this case very well falls within the scope and norms of the judgments .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1999 (HC)

Arunagiri, L. Vs. Management of Tirunelveli Central Co-operative Bank ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-20-1999

Reported in : (2000)IILLJ321Mad; (2000)1MLJ596

..... and not necessary to be gone into.18. for all the above reasons, it is hereby concluded that the petitioner is entitled to back wages as claimed in the petition. patent errors and perversity in approach is seen in the award made by the labour court so far it denies the back wages. the reasons assigned for such denial by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //