Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Year: 2000 Page 4 of about 65 results (0.032 seconds)

Mar 30 2000 (HC)

General Secretary, All India Tourism Development Corporation Employees ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-30-2000

Reported in : (2001)ILLJ834Mad

..... unit as a separate industrial establishment having its own separate and independent identity and existence which is not in the case in hand. the third respondent labour court has committed patent errors of law and perversity in approach so as to warrant interference of this court into the award passed by it.21. in result, the above writ petition succeeds and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2000 (HC)

Ennore Foundries Ltd. (Represented by Its Secretary) Vs. Government of ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-17-2000

Reported in : [2001(88)FLR884]; (2000)IIILLJ185Mad; (2001)1MLJ93

..... have held, in para. 3, at p. 17 of llj:'3. we have heard learned counsel for the parties. we are of the view that the high court fell into patent error in postponing the date of the operation of the notification. the notification, amending the rules, was a legislative act. the amendment of the rules being a delegated legislation, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2000 (HC)

Anna Co-operative Spinning Mills Vs. Additional Labour Court and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-09-2000

Reported in : (2000)IIILLJ836Mad

..... made available in the context of the facts and circumstances of the case and absolutely there does not creep in any infirmity or inconsistency nor does the order suffer from patent errors of law or perversity in approach not even for lack of opportunity before him resulting in violation of the principles of natural justice. the opportunity said to have been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 2000 (HC)

B. Deenadayalan Vs. the Management, Kancheepuram Kamakshiamman Silk Ha ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-15-2000

Reported in : (2001)1MLJ145

..... own conclusions on the articles of charges framed against the deliquent.31. assessing the order passed by the learned single judge, in the light of these rules, it could be patently seen that the learned single judge has arrived at his conclusions, based on the propositions propounded by this court in different judgments at different points of time. so far as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2000 (HC)

A. Sheik Dawood Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Direct ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-16-2000

Reported in : (2001)1MLJ246

..... serious infirmities or inconsistencies could be found in the entire judgment delivered by the lower court, nor the judgment and decree as passed by the lower court suffer from any patent errors of law or perversity in approach so as to warrant interference by this court into the same as it is prayed on the part of the appellant. this court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 2000 (HC)

R. Vijayabalan Vs. D. Jayakumari and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-01-2000

Reported in : (2001)1MLJ555

..... , there are visible alterations made in ink over the typed figures in the body of the deed as well as in the body description of property column. when there are patent material alterations, the plaintiffs ought to have proved that the alterations were not material and those alterations were not made by them. furthermore, when the mandatory requirements of section 26 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2000 (HC)

P. Soundarya Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-03-2000

Reported in : (2001)168CTR(Mad)447; [2001]113TAXMAN534(Mad)

..... son, retaining her life interest in the said property, declaring the sale consideration of the said property at rs. 2,40,000. the declaration made by the revision petitioner is patently false and the same has been made by the revision petitioner to use the same as genuine evidence in the proceeding before the income-tax authority, which is a judicial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2000 (HC)

P. Ravi Kumar Vs. the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-25-2000

Reported in : II(2000)ACC491; AIR2000Mad367; 2000(2)CTC151; (2000)IIMLJ358

..... for this court to cause its interference into the impugned notice issued by the respondent herein which is well in confirmity with law. 10. no other infirmity or inconsistency or patent errors of law or perversity in approach so far as the coming into being of the impugned notice of demand dated 4.1.1993 has been either shown or brought .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2000 (HC)

Solai Hall theatre Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-27-2000

Reported in : AIR2000Mad281

..... penalty imposed thereby confirming the orders passed by the appellate authority.9. so far as this court of judicial review is concerned, absolutely there is no infirmity or inconsistency or patent errors of law or perversity in approach in the passing of the orders impugned connecting to both the writ petitions above and the interference sought for quashing the said impugned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 2000 (HC)

Prasad Film Laboratories Vs. Presiding Officer, Principal Labour Court ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-03-2000

Reported in : [2001(89)FLR135]; (2001)IILLJ48Mad; (2001)1MLJ251

..... the continuation of employment of such person, who had lost the confidence of the employer will be very serious. the reinstatement of the persons like the second respondent, who had patently duped his employer by committing theft of the film entrusted by the customers would certainly harm the reputation of the petitioner company.22. the tribunal discharges its functions in the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //