Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 74 results (0.026 seconds)

Mar 18 2002 (HC)

Officine Lovato S.P.A. Vs. Raajan Automobiles (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-18-2002

Reported in : 2003(27)PTC343(Mad)

..... in india as well as in various other countries. the plaintiff came to know that the first defendant has been manufacturing and selling autogas conversion kit verbatim copying the registered patent and designs of the plaintiff with the offending trade mark raajan auto gas in chennai through their branch offices at vellore and coimbatore. it is a reproduction of the plaintiff ..... is an italy based company carrying on exclusive business throughout the world pertaining to auto gas conversion kit manufactured by them with a novel design and the same has been patented in various countries. since 1979, the plaintiff has been using the manufacturing the said auto gas conversion kit under the trade mark 'lovato' and 'lovato autogas' from italy and ..... permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them from in any manner passing off the plaintiffs auto gas conversion kit bearing the offending design, patent either by using the trade mark 'lovato autogas' or the trade mark raajan auto gas or any other mark or marks as and for the well established auto gas conversion ..... 'lovato autogas' or the trade mark raajan auto gas or any other mark or marks which are in any way identical with or colourable imitation of the plaintiff's registered patent, bearing the trade mark 'lovato' and 'lovato autogas', either by manufacturing, selling or offering for sale or in any manner advertising the same ; (b) granting permanent injunction restraining the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2002 (HC)

N. Rangaswamy Vs. Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-2002

Reported in : 2003(26)PTC408(Mad)

..... the branch office of the respondent is situate within the jurisdiction of this court and as such, seeking leave under clause 12 of the letters patent is absolutely unnecessary. it is open to the respondent to establish by evidence during the course bf the trial about the non-existence of ..... which is outside the jurisdiction of the court and under the circumstance, the applicant ought to have taken leave under clause 12 of the letters patent. para 16 of the plaint relates to cause of action, wherein it is stated that the respondent continues to indulge in violations and making hectic ..... vandalism in petroleum tankers and also at the best price. the plaintiff cannot claim monopoly rights especially as the plaintiff does not have any registered patent in the alleged system. only in the reply affidavit, the plaintiff has for the first time claimed passing off. there is no whisper of ..... times commercial production of the articles by industrial process based on the drawings are made. abloy security limited are the proprietors of number of patents registered in us patent office as mentioned in para 'y'. the sealing of the tankers carrying petroleum products have been made mandatory by petroleum rules, 1976. the ..... based on the said system. the plaintiff having come to existence only in the year 1998, cannot claim any monopoly over the said patent. the life of the patent has long since expired and the technique involved has fallen into public domain and the system can now be used by any person. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2002 (HC)

Usv Limited Vs. Ipca Laboratories Limited

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-26-2002

Reported in : 2003(26)PTC21(Mad)

..... for the reputation of the make only the applicant is concerned with. in of the decisions reported in horlick's malted milk company v. sumerskill, 1916 the illustrated official journal (patents) supplement 1 and corn products refining co. v. shangrila food products ltd., , it was held that the reputation will attach only to trade mark of the goods purchased by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 2002 (HC)

K.P. Seethalakshmi Vs. Indian Bank, Esplanade Branch, Madras,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-31-2002

Reported in : (2002)3MLJ146

..... , 1995, was transferred to city civil court. but certainly that court has no jurisdiction since the power available to original side of high court under clause 12 of the letters patent is not available to city civil courts and the mortgaged properties are situated outside the city civil court. in those circumstances, plaintiff in that case filed a transfer application to ..... file the plaint in the sub court, srivilliputhur, or (2) to file it before the original side of high court praying the court to invoke clause 13 of the letters patent for the purposes of justice. that being so, plaintiff presenting the plaint before the sub court, srivilliputhur is in order. the fact that initially the plaintiff moved high court and ..... clause 13 of the letters patent, the original side of the high court could have proceeded with the matter notwithstanding the fact of change in the pecuniary jurisdiction if it so desired for the purposes of ..... of the documents and creating an equitable mortgage took place in the city of madras and a leave to sue was obtained as contemplated under clause 12 of the letters patent. the original side of the high court returned the plaint with a direction to present the same before the debt recovery tribunal. of course, by virtue of powers vested under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2002 (HC)

Alphonse Vs. S. Dharmaraj

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-06-2002

Reported in : (2002)2MLJ185

..... .4.1988. (d) the inconsistent stand of the respondent in reference to themotive for the alleged execution of the three documents and the failure of thelearned judge to consider the patent illegality in those documents has occasioned failure of justice.9. learned senior counsel mr. g. masilamani arguing on behalf ofthe respondent made the following submissions :(a) the properties were purchased .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2002 (HC)

V. Udayakumar, Vs. I. Navaneethammal,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-22-2002

Reported in : (2002)1MLJ519

..... . hence, we do not find anyillegality in the findings of the trial judge as well as the learnedsingle judge in granting the decree for specific performance. 19. hence, the letters patent appeal is dismissed.

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2002 (HC)

N.A. Abdul Rahim and Razia Begam Vs. A.M.K. Mariam Bibi,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-06-2002

Reported in : (2002)1MLJ836

..... pendency of the suit; and also held that the plaintiffs are entitled for mesne profits, the quantum of which will be decided in the execution proceedings. hence the above letters patent appeal has been preferred by the defendants.10.1. mr.k.sarvabhauman, learned senior counsel for the defendants, contends that the oral gift is permissible under the mohammedan law. since .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 2002 (HC)

John Sylem Vs. Chanthanamuthu Pillai (Died),

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-12-2002

Reported in : AIR2003Mad374

..... . the learned single judge was right in rejecting the appeal against the dismissal of the plaintiff's suit. 12. we do not find any merit in this appeal. the letters patent appeal is dismissed with costs. consequently, cmps. no. 2030 to 2032 of 2002 are dismissed.

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 04 2002 (HC)

NeslIn Joseph Prim Vs. the Presiding Officer, Central Government Indus ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-04-2002

Reported in : (2002)IIILLJ686Mad

..... yet in effect it operated at bangalore where the workman was employed. consequently the situs of the workman's employment in the case of the termination of his services is patently a paramount factor if not being wholly conclusive. it is within the area of employment that the order of termination operates and the workman ceases to be a workman and ..... right to hold the post and receive wages therefore. therefore on the anvil of the principle of where the impugned order operates the situs of employment of the workman is patently significant. can it possibly be said that the order of termination of a workman does not operate within the area of his employment? the answer, therefore, has to be in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Coromandel Indag Products P. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-31-2002

Reported in : (2003)183CTR(Mad)90; [2004]265ITR611(Mad)

..... it on a question of fact, records a finding, this court will not interfere such a finding unless the said finding is not supported by any evidence or perverse or patently unreasonable. in our view, the finding of the tribunal in the penalty appeal is not based on any evidence and it is perverse and it is ..... patently erroneous and unreasonable as it has overlooked the materials produced before the assessing officer and in the absence of any material, the appellate tribunal has come to an erroneous conclusion. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //