Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 74 results (0.036 seconds)

Jan 09 2003 (HC)

Arunachala Mudaliar Vs. Jayalakshmi Ammal and V.R. Rajasekharan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-09-2003

Reported in : AIR2004Mad180; 2003(1)CTC355; (2003)1MLJ626

..... false. 27. for the above said reasons we set aside the judgment and decree of the learned single judge and restore the judgment of the learned district judge. the letters patent appeal is allowed. no costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 2003 (HC)

A.S. Baskaran, Proprietor of Sri Amman Leathers Vs. Indian Finance and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-18-2003

Reported in : AIR2004Mad54; I(2004)BC256; 2003(4)CTC218

..... by a division bench of this court, while considering the expression of 'suits for land or other immovable property' occurring in clause 12 of the letters patent of this court with regard to the suits for recovery of money by enforcement of equitable mortgages, in the decision in southern petrochemical industries corporation ltd. ..... daulate and anr. 2001 (4) ctc 39, in which the question as to what is meant by 'suit for land' within clause 12 of letters patent of the high court of judicature at bombay was considered and their lordships referred to and extracted in the judgment, the divergence of opinion among the learned ..... local limits of whose jurisdiction the property is situated under section 16(c) c.p.c. as well as under clause 12 of the letters patent and the plaintiff in the present case has admitted that the property over which the mortgage is created is situated in chengalpet district, outside the jurisdiction ..... of 1999 granted leave to sue the defendants and hence the suit was filed in the original side of this court invoking the provisions of letters patent and original side rules. it is further stated by the respondent that the applicant cannot invoke section 16, c.p.c. and the suit is ..... in the case of mortgage or charge upon immovable property under section 16-c, c.p.c as well as under clause 12 of the letters patent, shall be instituted in the court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the property is situated and in the instant case, the plaintiff has admitted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 2003 (HC)

Jayam Company Rep. by Its Partner, Ramasamy Nadar and Senthil Murugan ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-04-2003

Reported in : II(2003)BC584; 2003CriLJ2890

..... same cannot be accepted as reasonable and therefore, at this score also the judgment of the trial court fails.13. in short, the judgments of the trial court suffer from patent errors of law and perversity in approach and therefore become only liable to be set aside and hence the following judgment:in result, i) both the above criminal appeals succeed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2003 (HC)

P.T. Sumber Mitra Jaya Vs. the National Highways Authority of India (M ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-18-2003

Reported in : AIR2003Mad221; (2003)2MLJ69

..... firstly there was no sub-contracting and much less the same was not without approval. it was pleaded that the actions of black-listing and cancellation of the bids were patently illegal, hazardous and likely to cause prejudice to the appellant apart from being contrary to the terms and conditions of contract. the appellant even challenged the authority of the respondent ..... the terms and conditions of contract, no sub-contracting could be done without the prior approval of the respondent. the respondent justified its' action by suggesting that there was a patent breach of this clause and that the respondent was well within its rights to blacklist the appellant as also to cancel the bidding process in respect of contract package no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2003 (HC)

R. Kasthuri Vs. R. Raveendran

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-03-2003

Reported in : AIR2003Mad302; (2003)1MLJ738

n.v. balasubramanian, j. 1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned single judge in c.m.a. no. 517 of 1995. the appellant herein is the wife and the respondent is her .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2003 (HC)

Seethalakshmi Ammal, W/O A.T. Ramaswamy Naicker Vs. Tmt. R. Ganapathi ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-11-2003

Reported in : 2003(2)ARBLR582(Madras); (2003)2MLJ460

..... a proposition of law which is erroneous, etc?.'12. in maharashtra seb v. sterilite industries (india), reported in the supreme court has held that unless the error of law is patent on the face of the award, neither the high court nor the supreme court can interfere with the award.13. we have already held that both parties were enquired and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 2003 (HC)

Parvathi Ammal (Died) and C. Loganathan Vs. Kamalammal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-09-2003

Reported in : 2003(3)CTC404; (2003)3MLJ131

..... set aside the judgment and decree of the trial judge and allowed the appeal. it is against the said judgment and decree of the learned single judge, the above letters patent appeal has been preferred. 22. during the pendency of the appeal, the sole appellant, the second plaintiff, who is the wife of munusami naicker, died and she had executed a ..... trial judge and on appeal before this court, the learned judge of this court reversed the judgment and decree of the learned trial judge. during the pendency of the letters patent appeal, the second plaintiff, the sole appellant, also died and the second appellant was brought on record as the legal representative of the deceased appellant. 3. the suit was filed ..... of the learned judge is liable to be set aside and accordingly it is set aside and the judgment and decree of the trial court are set restored. the letters patent appeal stands allowed. there will be no order as to costs. consequently, c.m.p.no. 8842 of 2000 is closed. ..... n.v. balasubramanian, j. 1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned judge of this court rendered in a.s.no. 403 of 1985 dated 20.08.1999 reversing the judgement and decree .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 17 2003 (HC)

Arun Balakrishnan Iyer and anr. Vs. Soni Hospital and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-17-2003

Reported in : AIR2003Mad389

..... objected to the jurisdiction of this court when they were in the box. thus, the defendants have submitted to the jurisdiction of this court. by reading section 12 the letters patent together with order iii, rule 1, this court gets jurisdiction to decide all the issues; therefore, the arguments of the learned counsel for the defendants that this court has no ..... this court; since this court has granted leave to sue the defendants, this court has got jurisdiction to try this issue.16. of this court, section 12 of the letters patent confers original jurisdiction as to suits. in that clause, with respect to all cases other than cases relating to immovable properties, this court has jurisdiction to try that case where .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2003 (HC)

Usv Limited Vs. Systopic Laboratories Limited and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-11-2003

Reported in : 2003(27)PTC203(Mad)

..... that sections 16, 17 and 20 will not apply to the high court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction. so we then look to the letters patent for guidance. clause 12 of the letters patent provides that : 'this court in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction shall be empowered to receive, try and determine suits of every description if in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 2003 (HC)

A.R. Deivasigamani Mudaliar Vs. T.N. Somasundara Nadar (Died) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-09-2003

Reported in : (2003)91MLJ3

..... gone through the judgment of the learned judge. we do not find any justifiable reason to differ from the judgment of the learned single judge. accordingly, we dismiss the letters patent appeal subject to the direction that the respondents 2 to 5 shall deposit a sum of rs. 50,000/- to the credit of o.s. no. 3614 of 1971 on ..... n.v. balasubramanian, j.1. this letters patent appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree passed by a learned single judge of this court in a.s. no. 732 of 1981 dated 11.3.1997 dismissing the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //