Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 258 results (0.034 seconds)

Sep 21 2012 (HC)

Salzer Electronics Ltd Vs. Sg Controls and Switchgear

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-21-2012

..... applicant had distinguished the relevant prior arts, which explicitly brings out the difference from each of the prior art. the applicant had also explained the difference between the us patent and salzer patent. 10. in the light of these rival contentions, it has to be seen whether the applicant has made out any case for the grant of an interim order? ..... assembling. every manufacturers of the cam operated rotary switches use the same red and yellow colour. therefore, the applicant cannot claim and exclusive right over the said colour. in claiming patent referring to prior art, the plaintiff had stated that "modern rotary switches are, however, more complex and standardized. the selective switching action between pole(s) and load terminal(s) ..... counterfeit rotary switches using the applicant's identical technology. the intention of the first respondent was obvious. they by their wrongful activities had committed the acts of infringement of the patent. the second respondent is the dealer of the first respondent's impugned product. the specification of the applicant's product as well as the respondents' product was set out ..... had purchased the respondents' product and dismantled the same to know its dimensions and specifications. it is apparent that the respondent had imitated all features of the applicant's patented product. the applicant had issued a legal notice on 08.04.2010 calling upon the respondents to cease and desist from manufacturing the product. the first respondent by reply .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 2012 (TRI)

B. Suvarama Phani Vs. the Chairman / Managing Director, Miot Hospitals ...

Court : Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on : Oct-08-2012

..... reports were still awaited. he allowed the patient to go home asking him to come back with all the investigation reports and for the time being, taking into account the patents clinical history he made a provisional diagnosis of infective hepatitis and described broad spectrum antibiotics and other drugs and the patient was asked to come back for review. he advised ..... records and when there is reliable and cogent evidence on record to substantiate the negligence of the opposite parties, we need not go in search of experts evidence. it is patently evident that there has been negligence and deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties 1 and 2 right from the beginning till the end, throughout the process .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2012 (HC)

The Controller of Examination. Vs. P.Muralitharan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-05-2012

prayer writ appeal filed under clause 15 of the letters patent against the order dated 14.02.2012 passed in w.p.(md)no.13323 of 2011 on the file of this court.r.banumathi, j1. being aggrieved by the order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 2012 (HC)

The Secretary to Government Vs. S.Ganesan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-10-2012

prayerthe writ appeal is filed under clause 15 of the letters patent act against the order dated 01.02.2012 passed in m.p.(md) nos.1 and 2 of 2012 in w.p.(md) no.7482 of 2011 on the file .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 2012 (HC)

The Managing Director. Vs. Sri Bannariamman Modern Rice Mill

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-03-2012

prayer:- writ appeals filed under clause 15 of the letters patent against the order dated 12.7.2011 in w.p.no.8844 of 2011 on the file of this court.judgment(judgment of the court was delivered by d. murugesan, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2012 (HC)

P.Manivannan. Vs. the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniform Services.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-16-2012

prayer writ appeal filed under clause 15 of letters patent against the order dated 21.06.2012 made in w.p.(md)no.8473 of 2009 on the file of this court.judgment r.banumathi,j1. challenging the order passed in w.p. (md) no.8473 of 2012 dated 21.06.2012, appellant has preferred this appeal.2. in the writ petition, appellant has sought for writ of mandamus directing the respondents to scrutinize the application no.133975 submitted by the appellant on 29.03.2012 and also directed the respondents to allow the appellant to participate in the physical test, medical test and interview.3. when the writ appeal is taken up today, mr.k.chellapandian, learned additional advocate general, assisted by mr.k.p.krishna doss, learned government advocate takes notice for respondents. learned additional advocate general submitted that the physical test, medical test and interview for the post of grade-i constable is already over.4. in such view of the matter, nothing survives for consideration in this appeal and the writ appeal has become infructuous. accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. no costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2012 (HC)

A.Vijayakumar Vs. the Regional Joint Registrar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-02-2012

..... respondents to promote the petitioner as assistant general manager on the vacancy cost in thiruchirappalli central co-operative bank, the head office.prayerappeal filed under clause 15 of the letters patent act against the order, dated 30.04.2010 of his lordship mr. justice p.jyothimani, made in m.p.(md).no. 3 of 2010 in w.p(md)no.6542 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 12 2012 (HC)

Siva Blue Metals Vs. the District Collector

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-12-2012

..... reply except saying that it is not satisfactorily. therefore, the supreme court has held that the bias of the third respondent which was latent in the show cause notice became patent in the order of the cancellation of the registration certificate. the cancellation order quotes the show cause notice and is a non-speaking one and virtually no order in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2012 (HC)

Ms.Sri Krishna Constructions. Vs. Ms.Tiffin's Barytes

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-02-2012

prayer: appeal filed under order xxxvi, rule 11 of o.s. rules, r/w. clause 15 of the letters patent against the judgment and order dated 30.3.2012 made in c.a.no.1911 of 2010 in c.p.no.326 of 2010.j u d g m e .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2012 (HC)

Regency Officers and Workers Vs. Regency Ceramics Ltd

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-26-2012

..... this court. the veracity of such allegations could be considered only in a full fledged trial.22. the provisions of clause - 12 of letters patent should have been extracted for better appreciation:- "12. original jurisdiction as to suits:- and we do further ordain that the said high court of ..... arisen in cochin. ......."in the said judgment, this court has considered the requirement of application for leave to sue under clause 12 of letters patent would arise when part of cause of action arose within the original jurisdiction of this court.15. in yet another judgment of this court reported ..... therefore, the allegations made in the plaint would be sufficient to hold the key regarding the compliance of the ingredients of clause -12 of the letters patent.5. the learned counsel for the respondent / plaintiff would cite catena of judgments in support of his argument, which would run as follows:-1) ..... seeking for permanent injunction would arise within the jurisdiction of this court also and therefore, the ingredients of clause -12 of the letters patent as to part of cause of action arose within the original jurisdiction of this court would entitle the plaintiff to obtain leave to file the ..... plaintiff would submit in his argument that for filing a suit before this court invoking the original jurisdiction, the ingredients of clause -12 of letters patent would alone be attracted and sections 16, 17 and 20 of cpc were excluded from the application to high court proceedings as per the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //