Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: chennai Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 208 results (0.028 seconds)

Apr 17 2014 (HC)

1.The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. 1.M.Seeniammal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-17-2014

..... vs. 1.t.raju 2.the correspondent punitha arockia annai higher secondary school punalvasal post pattukottai taluk thanjavur district. ... respondents prayer writ appeal filed under section 15 of letters patents act against the order of this court dated 11.08.2011 in w.p.(md) no.8539 of 2010. for appellants : mr.vr.shanmuganathan special government pleader for respondents ..... officer, nagercoil, kanyakumari district. 4.the district educational officer, kuzhithurai taluk kanyakumari district. ... appellants vs. s.rajayyan ... respondent prayer writ appeal filed under section 15 of letters patents act against the order of this court dated 04.04.2013 in w.p.(md) no.5220 of 2013. for appellants : mr.b.pugalendhi special government pleader for respondents : ..... social welfare, chennai. 3.the district social welfare officer, toovipuram ii thoothukudi district. ... appellants vs. s.maragathavalli ... respondent prayer writ appeal filed under section 15 of letters patents act against the order of this court dated 26.04.2011 in w.p.(md) no.4666 of 2011. for appellants : mr.k.chellapandian additional advocate general assisted by ..... welfare, chennai. 3.the district social welfare officer, eagle compound nagercoil kanyakumari district. ... appellants vs. v.vasanthabai ... respondent prayer writ appeal filed under section 15 of letters patents act against the order of this court dated 27.04.2011 in w.p.(md) no.4912 of 2011. for appellants : mr.k.chellapandian additional advocate general assisted by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2014 (HC)

M.C.Jayasingh Vs. Mishra Dhatu Nigam Limited

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-23-2014

..... every advancement made to the existing knowledge, was actually slender. i do not know whether these small adjustments and alterations, which offered better flexion and movement to patients, were patented and if patented, whether their validity was tested. but, one thing is clear, namely that every advancement or development, was aimed at making the prosthesis sync with human anatomy, so that ..... are many instances in various branches of science of independent investigators making the same discovery. that does not prevent the one who first applies and gets a patent from having a good patent, for a patent represents a quid pro quo. the quid to the patentee is the monopoly; the quo is that he presents to the public the knowledge which they ..... his actions were safe and lawful.' letter to mcpherson, supra at 181, 182. apparently agreed with jefferson and the board that the courts should develop additional conditions for patentability. although the patent act was amended, revised or codified some 50 times between 1790 and 1950, congress steered clear of a statutory set of requirements other than the bare novelty and utility ..... which we set out in the margin. [footnote 2]. he rejected a natural rights theory in intellectual property rights and clearly recognised the social and economic rationale of the patent system. the patent monopoly was not designed to secure to the inventor his natural right in his discoveries. rather, it was a reward, an inducement, to bring forth new knowledge. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2014 (HC)

1.The Principal Secretary, Vs. M.Palanikani

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-03-2014

..... .a.thoulath beevi 43.j.ponmudy 44.s.alice 45.g.mary rosline pelisal 46.s.rajeswari 47.v.santha ..respondents prayer : writ appeal filed under section 15 of letters patents act to set aside the order dated 11.06.2013, passed in w.p.(md.no.5316 of 2013. w.p.(md.no.12689 of 2014:- i.suseela ..petitioner versus ..... . 6.principal accountant general (accounts and entitlements).tamil nadu, no.361, anna salai, chennai ?. 600 018..appellants versus a.tamilarasi ..respondent prayer : writ appeal filed under section 15 of letters patents act to set aside the order dated 27.06.2012, passed in w.p.(md.no.7529 of 2011. w.a.(md.no.1024 of 2014:- 1.the government of ..... . 6.principal accountant general (accounts and entitlements).tamil nadu, no.361, anna salai, chennai ?. 600 018..appellants versus p.mary ..respondent prayer : writ appeal filed under section 15 of letters patents act to set aside the order dated 27.06.2012, passed in w.p.(md.no.7070 of 2011. w.a.(md.no.606 of 2014:- 1.the government of ..... . 4.principal accountant general (accounts and entitlements).tamil nadu, no.361, anna salai, chennai ?. 600 018 ..appellants versus m.palanikani ..respondent prayer : writ appeal filed under section 15 of letters patents act to set aside the order dated 27.06.2012, passed in w.p.(md.no.8287 of 2011. w.a.(md.no.605 of 2014:- 1.the government of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 2014 (HC)

The Inspector General of Registration Vs. K.P.Kadar Hussain

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-04-2014

..... were under valued. consequently, the views taken by the learned single judges, in allowing the writ petitions, filed by the respondents, do not suffer from any material irregularity or patent illegality in the eye of law. resultantly, the writ appeals fail. 47.in the result, the writ appeals are dismissed, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. ..... : appeal filed under clause 15 of the letter patents as against the order dated 21.03.2013 in w.p.no.5264 of 2013 passed by the learned single judge. for appellants : mr.al.somayaji advocate general asst ..... & 1922/2013: appeal filed under clause 15 of the letter patents as against the order dated 27.03.2013 in w.p.nos.3756 & 3757 of 2013 passed by the learned single judge. prayer in w.a.no.2026/2013 ..... 1773/2013: appeal filed under clause 15 of the letter patents as against the common order dated 23.04.2013 in w.p.nos.9258 to 9261 of 2013 passed by the learned single judge. prayer in wa.nos.1921 ..... & 1922/2013 k.p.syed firoze ..respondent in wa.no.2026/2013 prayer in wa.nos.1436 & 1437/2013: appeal filed under clause 15 of the letter patents as against the common order dated 08.01.2013 in w.p.nos.29638 & 29799 of 2012 passed by the learned single judge. prayer in wa.nos.1770 to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2014 (HC)

Standard Corporation India Ltd Vs. Tractors and Farm Equipment Ltd

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-04-2014

..... . the learned counsel for the appellant had further stated that no relief against the alleged infringement of passing off can be claimed, in respect of the rights relating to copyrights, patents and designs. a claim can be made only in respect of infringement of such rights, under section 16 of the trade marks act, 1999.7. it had been further stated ..... in m.c.production vs. a.sundaresan (air1976madras22 wherein, it had been held as follows: ".section 15 declares that no copyright shall subsist in any design registered under the indian patents and designs act, 1911. sub-section (2) of this section deals with a particular design which is capable of being registered under the indian ..... patents and designs act, 1911, but, which has not been so registered. such design shall cease as soon as any article to which the design has been applied has been reproduced .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 09 2014 (HC)

Salzer Electronics Limited Vs. S.G.Controls and Switchgear Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-09-2014

..... intention to dilute the exclusivity attached with the appellant/plaintiff's integral cam operated rotary switches. the situs of the appellant/plaintiff's intellectual property viz., the patent is situated within the jurisdiction of this court. indeed, the look alike imitative, spurious, counterfeit rotary switches of the respondents/defendants are sold, distributed and ..... /plaintiff caused a legal notice on 08.04.2010 calling upon the 1st respondent/1st defendant to cease and desist from manufacturing the impugned product imitating its patented technology. however, the 1st respondent/1st defendant, through its letter dated 21.04.2010, declined the request made by the appellant/plaintiff and it temporarily ..... their legal representatives, successors-in-business, agents, stockists, distributors.assigns, representatives, or any one claiming under them from in any manner infringing the plaintiff's registered patent under no.198122 in respect of integral cam operated rotary switch by manufacturing, marketing, selling, offering for sale or exporting cam operated rotary switches identical or similar ..... their legal representatives, successors-in-business, agents, stockists, distributors.assigns, representatives, or any one claiming under them from in any manner infringing the applicant's registered patent under no.198122 in respect of integral cam operated rotary switch by manufacturing, marketing, selling, offering for sale or exporting cam operated rotary switches identical or similar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2014 (HC)

1.The Principal Director, Vs. G.Gurusamy

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-23-2014

..... . vs. g.gurusamy ... respondent in w.a.(md) no.1017/2014 s.kaliappan ... respondent in w.a.(md) no.1018/2014 prayer : writ appeals filed under section 15 of letters patents act to set aside and revise the order, dated 04.04.2013, made in w.p.(md)nos.3115 and 3116 of 2012 and allow the writ appeals. !for appellants .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2014 (HC)

C.Annadurai Vs. 1.P.Durai ..

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-15-2014

..... .the thasildar, manamadurai taluk, sivagangai district. 6.baskaran 7.rajesh kumar ... respondents 2 to 7/ respondents 1 to 4, 6 & 7 prayer : writ appeal filed under section 15 of letters patents act to set aside the order dated 05.08.2014, passed in w.p.(md) no.15206 of 2012. !for appellant : mr.k.k.senthil ^for respondent no.1 : mr .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2014 (HC)

C.Annadurai Vs. 1.P.Durai ..

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-15-2014

..... .the thasildar, manamadurai taluk, sivagangai district. 6.baskaran 7.rajesh kumar ... respondents 2 to 7/ respondents 1 to 4, 6 & 7 prayer : writ appeal filed under section 15 of letters patents act to set aside the order dated 05.08.2014, passed in w.p.(md) no.15206 of 2012. !for appellant : mr.k.k.senthil ^for respondent no.1 : mr .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 30 2014 (HC)

G.Velayutha Nadar Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-30-2014

..... , trichy town, khajamalai post, trichy district. 2.the inspector of police, k.k.nagar police station, trichy town, trichy district..respondents prayer writ appeal filed under section 15 of letters patents act against the order of this court dated 04.02.2014 made in w.p.(md.no.3457 of 2011. !for appellant : mr.c.dhanaseelan ^for respondents : mr.b.pugalenthi .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //