Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Page 2 of about 1,904 results (0.033 seconds)

Aug 08 2006 (HC)

Wyeth Holdings Corpn. and anr. Vs. Controller General of Patents, Desi ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2007(34)PTC1(Guj)

..... reposes confidence in the judiciary as it still maintains 'judicial discipline.'9. the office is directed to send this judgment and order to respondent no. 1 the controller general of patents, designs and trade marks for his attention and necessary action, which shall be placed on the record of this case.10. coming to the merits of the case, though it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 1961 (HC)

Juvan Sinhji Balusinhji and ors. Vs. Balbhadrasinhji Indrasinhji and o ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1963Guj209; (1962)3GLR715

..... to the true intent of the makers of the act, 'pro bono publico' '. this rule was reaffirmed by earl of halsbury in eastman photographic material co. v. comptroller general of patents, designs and trade marks, (1898) ac 571 in the following words:-'my lords, it appears to me that to construe the statute in question, it is not only legitimate but .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2008 (HC)

Hind Mosaic and Cement Works and anr. Vs. Shree Sahjanand Trading Corp ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : LC2008(1)402; 2008(37)PTC128(Guj)

..... irreparable loss are present in this case and, therefore, initially the trial court has rightly granted interim relief and only when the respondents have filed an application for revocation of patent, the case was transferred to this court and thereafter, the learned single judge has vacated this interim relief. by vacating this interim relief, the learned single judge has not ..... synergy. according to the appellants, learned single judge failed to consider and even refer to the expert report/certificate on record in this regard. the different elements of the patented invention are functioning in a way unknown earlier. the learned single judge failed to consider the material on record that the functionality of the wire has changed by the ..... to mislead and prejudice the court. the appellants were mainly aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the finding given by the learned single judge to the effect that the granted patent is mere combination and/or arrangement or re-arrangement or duplication of known-device/integers without there being any synergy amongst different integers and combination of known devices functioning in ..... therefore asked its representative to collect the product of respondent no. 2 from the respondent no. 1. the appellant thereby came to know that the respondents have illegally copied the patented product of the appellant. the appellants were, therefore, constrained to file suit being regular civil suit no. 1432 of 2007 in the court of learned city civil judge, ahmedabad .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 1968 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Ii Vs. Alembic Glass Industries Lt ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1969]71ITR752(Guj)

..... that account a mere licensee for a limited period of the technical knowledge of the swiss company with the right to use the patents and trade marks of that company. the assessee acquired under the agreement merely the right to draw, for the purpose of carrying on its business as manufacturer and dealer of ..... contribution was allowable as business expenditure under section 10(2)(xv). the assessee did not under the agreement become entitled exclusively, even for the period of the agreement, to the patents and trade marks of the swiss company; it had merely access to the technical knowledge and experience in the pharmaceutical filed which the swiss company commanded. the assessee was on ..... or drafts, which might be useful to introduce licensed preparations and to promote their sale in india. it granted to the assessee full and sole right and licence under the patents listed in the agreement to make use, exercise and vend the inventions specified therein in india and also a licence to certain specified trade marks in the territory subject to ..... ) without the written consent of the swiss company, not to assign the benefit of the agreement or grant sub-licences of the patents and trade marks; and (c) upon termination of the agreement for any cause to use the patents and trade marks and to return to the swiss company all copies of information, scientific data or material sent to it and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2001 (HC)

Satish Maganlal Vora Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2001)3GLR2192

..... and alcohol which the appellant uses and raises the octane level. it was stated by his learned counsel that the appellant had even applied for a patent under patents act, 1970, but the concerned authority returned his application (which was shown to the court) for want of details of the process. however, since ..... the garb of an invented commodity. an invention is a new method, an instrument or device which is created by thought, one for which a patent can be granted. invention cannot be understood in the sense of concoction of a false story, invented to circumvent the statutory provisions enacted to ensure ..... a process for producing such substance (clause f); will not be considered to be inventions. that what is not an invention for the purpose of patents law cannot be consecrated as an invention by the court. otherwise, what the law denounces so very specifically by stating that an invention the use ..... did not want to disclose his trade secret formally, he did not apply again. 18.1 the word 'invention' is defined under section 2(j) of the patent act, which means any new and useful (i) art, process, method or manner of manufacture; (ii) machine, apparatus or other articles; (iii) substance produced ..... torture and agony to him by the impugned action of the respondents. 2.2 in special civil application no. 9076 of 2000 from which the letters patent appeal no. 692 of 2000 arises (in the title of which writ petition, the appellant had also mentioned special civil application no. 5981 of 1999 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 1976 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-i Vs. S.L.M. Maneklal Industries L ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1977]107ITR133(Guj)

..... that account a mere licensee for a limited period of the technical knowledge of the swiss company with the right to use the patents and trade marks of that company. the assessee acquired under the agreements merely the right to draw, for the purpose of carrying on its business as a manufacture and dealer ..... contribution was allowable as business expenditure under section 10(2) (xv). the assessee did not under the agreement become entitled exclusively, even for the period of the agreement, to the patents and trade marks of the swiss company; it had merely access to the technical knowledge and experience in the pharmaceutical field which the swiss company commanded. the assessee was on ..... or drags, which might be useful to introduce licensed preparations and to promote their sale in india. it granted to the assessee full and sole right and licence under the patent listed in the agreement to make, use, exercise and vend the inventions specified therein in india and also a license to use certain specified trade marks in the territory subject ..... the written onsent of the swiss company, not to assign the benefit of the agreement or grant sub-licenses of the patents and trade marks; and (c) upon termination of the agreement for any cause to cease to use the patents and trade marks and to return to the swiss company all copies of information, scientific date or material sent to it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 1999 (HC)

Cadbury India Limited Vs. Sm Dyechem Limited

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2000)1GLR680

..... court held that no person can claim exclusive right of descriptive name. similarly, delhi high court in the case of rupee gains tele-times pvt. ltd. v. rupee times, 1995 patents and trade marks cases, 384, held that the word 'rupee' is not distinctive word and it is connected with trade and business.29. what is the position here? the plaintiff ..... '.28.2. similar view was taken by the madras high court in the case of indo-pharma pharmaceuticals works limited v. citadel fine pharmaceuticals limited, air 1998 madras 347 = 1998 patents and trade marks cases 775. in that case the appellant had filed the suit for injunction restraining the respondents from infringing its registered trademark 'enerjase'. the other company was using ..... .1. similar question arose before the high court of punjab & haryana in the case of punjab state co-operative supply and marketing federation limited v. sona spices private limited, 1987 patents and trademarks cases 294 (punjab & haryana). in that case punjab & haryana high court has refused the injunction as claimed for as there was no similarity to deceive an ordinary customer ..... of the user....'28. similarly, reliance can also be placed on a decision of the madras high court in the case of parle products limited v. bakemans industries limited, 1998 patent and trademarks cases, 662 (madras) wherein similar question was called for determination. in that case the applicant was a registered proprietor of the trademark gluco. the respondent was selling biscuits .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2010 (HC)

Acme Pharmaceuticals Vs. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : LC2010(1)217

..... rice and gen. mills v. amar singh chawalwala, apex court without going into the merits of the controversy, expressed an opinion that the matters relating to trademarks, copy rights and patents should be finally decided very expeditiously by the trial court instead of merely granting or refusing to grant injunction. experience shows that in the matters of trademarks, copy rights and ..... patents, litigation is mainly fought between the parties about the temporary injunction and that goes on for years and years and the result is that the suit is hardly decided finally. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1979 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-iv Vs. Jyoti Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1979]118ITR499(Guj)

..... ltd. : [1968]69itr692(sc) , the supreme court pointed out that where the assessee did not, under the agreement, become entitled exclusively even for the period of the agreement, to the patents and trade marks of the swiss company and had merely access to the technical knowledge and experience in the pharmaceutical field which the swiss company commanded and where the assessee ..... was a mere licensee for a limited period of the technical knowledge of the swiss company with the right to use the patents and trade marks of that company, the assessee could be said to have acquired under the agreement merely the right to draw, for the purpose of carrying on the business .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 1975 (HC)

Deepak Printery Vs. the Forward Stationary Mart and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1976)17GLR338

..... of the copyright act is to protect authors and artists from being exploited. so far as the commercial and industrial designs and rights are concerned, the legislature has enacted the patents act and the designs act. turning now to the copyright act, it is necessary to realise that 'ideas', can never be the subject matter of copyright. copyright can subsist in ..... repro duction of ideas and it does not give a monopoly to any particular form of words or design. it is thus to be distinguished from the rights conferred by patent trade mark and design legislation, which give to the registered proprietor an exclusive right to the registered material, even as against a person who has reproduced such material innocently and ..... the subject-matter of a design under the designs act. sub-section (2) of section 15 provides that in a design which is capable of being registered under the indian patents and designs act, 1911, no copyright can be claimed. this is the view which the learned trial judge has taken and in my opinion rightly. sofar as take design is .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //