Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Page 3 of about 1,904 results (0.021 seconds)

Sep 14 1973 (HC)

Somabhai Ishwarbhai Bhagat Vs. Natwerlal Chhanalal and Co. and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1975)16GLR130

..... for which it is enacted. now, section 7 confers a kind of limited protection on an intending patentee. it provides that after application for patent is accepted, as envisaged by section 6, the controller has to give notice thereof to the applicant and shall advertise the acceptance stating therein that ..... of patentee complaining of infringement of a patent or making, selling or using the invention without the licence of the patentee or against any who counterfeits it or imitates it. proviso to ..... infringement committed before the advertisement of the acceptance of the application.section 26 sets out the grounds on which application for revocation of the patent can be made and entertained by the high court. section 29 confers jurisdiction on the district court to entertain a suit at the instance ..... gone through the entire gamut of the suit, at the final hearing when the court was inclined to examine some serious contentions as to when patent can be sealed and in what circumstances, it can be revoked, simultaneously examining the question as to whether there was any inventive step taken ..... october 1971 but which, according to mr. p.m. raval, learned advocate now tells me, was sealed on 15th october 1971.2. the patent was in respect of a roasting apparatus and complete specification briefly describes the invention as providing a vertical rotating shaft, the vertical rotating shaft being .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2006 (HC)

Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2006)3GLR2204

..... thereto and other movable and immovable properties, cash in hand, cash at bank, investments, stocks, book debts (corporeal and incorporeal), tangible and intangible assets benefits, licenses, consents, authorities, registrations, patents, trade marks and powers of every kind, nature and description whatsoever, privileges, liberties, easements, advantages, benefits and approvals, contracts, deeds, schemes, bonds, agreements and other instruments and interest of ..... letters patent appeals. admittedly the letters patent appeals have been filed on 20.01.2005 wherein the appellant is shown as gujarat electricity board. the appeals are against common judgment and order dated 17 ..... filed by different companies seeking substitution of the name of the respective applicant-company in place of gujarat electricity board in the captioned special civil applications and letters patent appeals arising from respective special civil applications. the applicants herein are seeking substitution in place of the original respondents in the main petitions as well as in the ..... devoid of merits and is rejected.15. the prayer for substitution is, accordingly, allowed. the applicants are directed to amend the cause-title of the respective letters patent appeals. rule made absolute.16. registry to place a copy of this order in connected matters. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 1978 (HC)

Gariadhar Gram Panchayat Vs. Nanubhai S. Desai and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1978Guj96

..... opinion, he exercised the revisional jurisdiction when he examined those decisions. since he exercised revisional jurisdiction in relation to them appeal against his order under cl.15 of the letters patent is barred.15. therefore, this appeal is not maintainable and is dismissed with no order as to costs in the circumstances of the case. since we have held that ..... exercise of original jurisdiction under art. 226 which distinguished the revisional. proceedings under art. 227 of the constitution. we do not find any reference to clause 15 of the letters patent having been made in that decision. since it was conceded by the learned advocate who raised the preliminary objection that the taluka development officer who exercised. jurisdiction under s. 44 ..... , quashed the order of the taluka development officer and declared the petitioner in that petition duly elected as sarpanch of sankhari gram panchayat. that order was challenged in the letters patent appeal. in, that appeal it was contended that the appeal was not maintainable. this court took the view that the appeal was maintainable. while doing so, it proceeded on ..... constitution.10. it is, therefore, clear that if learned single judge of the high court exercises revisional jurisdiction, no appeal against his decision under cl 15 of the letters patent is competent. it is also clear that under article 227, the high court exercises revisional jurisdiction, the madras high court in the latter-mentioned judgment has described article 226 as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 1986 (HC)

C.M. Parikh and ors. Vs. V.M. Mehta and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1987)1GLR362

..... respondent r.m. adalja in the seniority list of superintendents (now section officers). further promotions of the appellants in the aforesaid three appeals, being letters patent appeals nos. 77, 95 and 96 of 1979 shall be given on the basis of their re-fixed seniority as aforesaid; and they shall be ..... , he shall be placed above his immediate junior respondent r.m. adalja in the seniority list of senior assistants and assistants. appellant in said letters patent appeal no. 77 of 1979 shall be deemed to have been promoted to the cadre of superintendents from the date on which his immediate junior respondent ..... in 1964. they were then promoted to the posts of superintendents. it is, therefore, obvious that these appellants are junior to the appellants in letters patent appeals nos. 77, 95 and 96 of 1979 in the cadre of assistants. we agree with the reasoning and conclusions reached by the learned single ..... which we shall have to consider while examining the submissions of the petitioners.25. mr. b.r. shah, learned advocate for the appellants-petitioners in letters patent appeals nos. 95 of 1979 and 96 of 1973, has raised the following contentions which are also adopted by mr. n. j. mehta, learned ..... at an appropriate stage.14. in order to appreciate the contentions raised by the appellants, it is necessary to refer the facts in brief from letters patent appeal no. 95 of 1979 (in special civil application no. 1996 of 1974). in that petition shri v.m. mehta, the petitioner, was recruited .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 1980 (HC)

Sharad Bansilal Vakil Vs. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1981)22GLR1019

..... justice or by the high court, is, therefore, consistently regarded by the statutes as a function in the administration of justice (see in this connection clause 8 of the letters patent for the high court's of calcutta, bombay and madras, section 9 of the high courts act, 1861, section 106 of the government of india act, 1915 and sections 223 ..... court has also been invested with legislative power under section 122 of the code of civil procedure 1908, section 23 of the contempt courts act, 1971, section 158 of the patents act, 1970 and other laws.13. the constitution also vests in the high court's administrative power besides the judicial and legislative powers. under article 237(2), the high court ..... of any law made by the appropriate legislature. it might be recalled that the legislative power of the high court has its genesis in the relevant clauses of the letters patent and section 13 of the high courts act, 1861 and that a similar provision was to be found in sections 106 and 108 of the government of india act, 1915 ..... of any law made by the appropriate legislature. the judicial power of the existing high courts at the commencement of the constitution conferred by the material clauses of the letters patent as well as by the then extent laws made by the appropriate legislature is thus saved by article 225 read with section 223 of the government of india act, 1935 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2015 (HC)

Win Plast Ltd. Vs. Symphony Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

..... cooler and is the genuine originator and the registered proprietor of the design of the above-referred model of air cooler. he tried to emphasise that the controller general of patents, design and trade mark has granted certificate of registration of the design of the aforesaid air cooler in favour of the original defendant which is produced at p. 307. 18 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 1995 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ashoka Mills Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1996)131CTR(Guj)1

..... to use the patents and the trade marks of that company. it was held that under the above agreement the assessee did not acquire any asset of advantage of an enduring nature for the ..... knowledge of the swiss company for a limited period of 5 years. even for that limited duration, the assessee did not, under the said agreement, become entitled exclusively to the patents and trade mark of the swiss company. the assessee was on that account merely licensee for a limited period of the technical knowledge of the swiss company with the right ..... it ref. no. 174 of 1983) for exclusive user of the trade mark 'tebilized', nor did any of the agreements dt. 30th sept., 1972, transfer any ownership right in any patent or trade mark in favour of any of the above assessee-companies, but the technical knowhow was for a process employed merely to give anti-crease property to cloth and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 1995 (HC)

B.C. Dwivedi Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1996)1GLR254; (1996)IILLJ60Guj

..... , the orders were not issued in compliance of the court's order dated 29-12-1982 and the government preferred a letters patent appeal no. 473 of 1982 before the division bench and on 7-4-1983 the letters patent appeal was dismissed, yet the order with regard to the petitioner's reinstatement was not issued and the petitioner had to file ..... by this court was not complied with on a flimsy pretext that the government was to file letters patents appeal against that interim relief and letter patent appeal was in fact filed, but the same was dismissed and despite the dismissal of the letters patent appeal, the orders with regard to his reinstatement had not been issued for a period of more than .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 27 1975 (HC)

Sarabhai Management Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, G ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1976]102ITR25(Guj)

..... to account, dispose of and deal with movable and immovable property and rights and privileges of all kings and in particular lands, buildings, easements, mortgages, debentures, produce concessions, options, contracts, patents, licences, machinery, plant, stock-in-trade, business concerns and undertakings and claims, privileges, concessions, and choses in action of all kinds.' 6. thus, from these different parts of the objects .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 1974 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-ii Vs. Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1974]96ITR672(Guj)

..... am afraid that i must use the phrase - sui generis. it is not easily compared with factory or officer buildings, warehouses, plant and machinery, or such independent legal rights as patents, copyright or trade marks, or even with goodwill. 'know-how' is an ambience that pervades a highly specialised production organisation, and, although i think it correct to describe it as .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //