Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Page 5 of about 1,904 results (0.009 seconds)

Sep 04 1987 (HC)

Reserve Bank of India, Bombay Vs. Harisidh Co-operative Bank Ltd. and ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1988Guj107; [1990]69CompCas260(Guj); (1987)2GLR1289

..... so as to secure proper management of the bank and protect the interest of the depositors.'3. aggrieved by the order granting interim relief, the reserve bank has filed letters patent appeal no. 270 of 1987. after going through s. 115a of the act and the relevant provisions of the banking regulation act, 1949, the deposit, insurance and credit guarantee corporation ..... with the provisions of law; and, therefore, deserves to be stayed. before coming to this conclusion we have also considered that the matter before us is by way of letters patent appeal against the discretionary order granting interim relief. we have thought it fit to interfere with such an order by staying the same, as in our opinion, allowing the said ..... with no order as to costs.9. when we were about to pronounce this order, mr. vaifiaria, the learned advocate for opponents nos.' 1 to 3 submitted that the letters patent appeal is not maintainable as it is filed against an order passed in a petition under art. 227 of the constitution. in our opinion, there is no substance in this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2000 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Lilaben K. Chamar

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [2001(90)FLR1145]

..... to be, in any way, vulnerable or nothing has been spell-out from the record, which would warrant our interference in exercise of powers under clause 15 of the letters patent.2. since we find that the impugned order requires no interference and we broadly agree with the views and the reasons assigned, in support of the order passed by the ..... j.n. bhatt, j.1. the short, but interesting question which arises in this lpa under clause 15 of the letters patent is, as to whether the confirmation of the award by the order of the learned single judge, dated 29.3.2000, in civil application no.14584/99 in special civil .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 1964 (HC)

Mehta Amritlal Gokaldas and ors. Vs. the State of Bombay and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1965Guj87; (1964)10GLR769

..... of section 65 makes it clear that the high court of andhra pradesh remains intact and extends its jurisdiction to the new territories. the conclusion was reached that the letters patent jurisdiction of the andhra pradesh high court extended the jurisdiction of the andhra pradesh high court to the new territories and did not preserve he law relating to the jurisdiction ..... bombay to the anything in the reorganization act which, by necessary implication, provides for any such extension. however, mr. i.m.nanavati contends that there are provisions in the letters patent themselves which would get automatically extended to the new areas which may be placed within the jurisidction of the old high court of bombay. in support of this proposition, mr ..... the law regulating the jurisdiction of the saurashtra high court is crystalized in section 52, the jurisdiction conferred on the high court of bombay by clause 15 of the letters patent is also crystallized under the reorganization act, and that the effect of this crystallization is that litigants from the saurashtra and other transferred areas will have the benefit of that ..... competent without the necessary certificates and that, thereof, all the present appeals deserve to be dismissed. that is the question which has been raised for decision this group of letters patent appeals.(4) now, inorder to understand and appreciate the rival contentions of both the sides, it is necessary to mention some of the provisions of the ordinance of 1948 and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 24 2001 (HC)

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Unjha Vs. Patel Jayantilal Purs ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR2002Guj245; (2002)1GLR924

..... municipal council to act as a member of unjha market committee. the legal question raised both at the instance of market committee and the present appellants in these two letters patent appeals is that irrespective of constitution of a fresh elected body to the unjha municipal council, the nomination made by the erstwhile elected body of the unjha municipal council to ..... nominated him.12. for the aforesaid reasons, we find no ground to take a different view on the provisions of law as taken by the learned single judge. the letters patent appeals, therefore, fail and are dismissed. no orders on civil applications.

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 2007 (HC)

Manubhai Chhaganbhai Thakore Vs. Union Bank of India and 2 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2007)3GLR2629; (2008)IILLJ226Guj

..... regional office, union bank of india, ahmedabad pursuant to the representation made by the appellant. 11. as far as the issue involved in the letters patent appeal is concerned, the appellant has filed the petition before the learned single judge of this court challenging the action of relieving the petitioner from service ..... withdraw such resignation. he has, therefore, submitted that no interference is called for while exercising appellate power under clause-15 of the letters patent and hence the letters patent appeal as well as civil application moved by the appellant deserves to be dismissed and/or rejected. 10. we have heard mr. shalin ..... passed by an authority of the bank who was not even joined as a party respondent either in the writ petition or in the letters patent appeal. he has further submitted that the impugned order runs in the teeth of the oral order dated 1.5.2006 passed by this court ..... ahmedabad, who has passed the impugned order dated 27.2.2007. this general manager was neither a party to the petition nor to the letters patent appeal. he has further submitted that on 11.1.2007, a quarterly meeting by the bank officials with the representatives of the all india union ..... his resignation was voidable at his option under section 19a of the indian contract act. 8. irrespective of the aforesaid submissions in the main letters patent appeal, mr.shalin mehta has submitted that in pursuance of the order dated 1.5.2006 passed by this court the appellant has made a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 1967 (HC)

Dawood Mahomed Pathan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1969Guj79

..... , the appellate court hearing the appeal under the letters patent is bound to hear the appeal both on questions of law and questions of fact, which were agitated before the learned judge against whose judgment the ..... a first appeal and he was therefore competent to decide not only questions of law but also questions of fact. since clause 15 of the letters patent appeal does not lay down any limitation of any sort either as regards the subject matter of the appeal or the powers of the appellate court ..... is not correct clause 15 of the letters patent gives a right of appeal against the decision of a single judge of this court except in such cases which are expressly excepted from the operation ..... india.15. during the course of his arguments, mr. vidyarthi, learned assistant government pleader, contended that in an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent, this court cannot go into the questions of fact decided by the learned judge against whose decision the appeal is preferred. in our opinion, this contention ..... article 5 of the constitution. diwan j. accordingly dismissed the appeal of the plaintiff. it is against that decision of diwan j. that this letters patent appeal has been filed by the plaintiff.3. at the hearing of this appeal before us the only point that was pressed on behalf of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 1986 (HC)

M.S. Desai and Co. Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1987Guj19; (1987)1GLR375

..... , ministry of petroleum which are binding to all petroleum companies like the respondent and, therefore, the impugned order is contrary to the mandatory directions of the central government and is patently arbitrary and, therefore, it violates the mandate of art. 14 of the constitution so far as the appellant petitioner is concerned. in our view, this type of grievance cannot be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2001 (HC)

Surat Mahila Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. Vs. Mamtaben Mahendrabhai Joshi

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [2001(90)FLR666]; (2002)1GLR755; (2001)IILLJ567Guj

..... evidence of both the sides, especially considering the reasoning given by the industrial court, we do not think that we can disturb the said finding of fact in this letters patent appeal and accordingly, we confirm the order of reinstatement passed by the labour court, but we reduce the back-wages from 100% to 50%. the appeal is, therefore, allowed only ..... mala fide. accordingly, the learned single judge dismissed the special civil application by confirming the orders of the industrial court as well as of the labour court. the present letters patent appeal is filed against the aforesaid judgment of the learned single judge.9. mr. v. b. patel, learned senior counsel, has argued the matter in great detail and has taken ..... p.b. majmudar, j.1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the order of the learned single judge dated 9th may, 2000 passed in special civil application no. 8195 of 1999 (coram : h. k. rathod, j. reported .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 1985 (HC)

Madhusudan Vegetable Products Co. Ltd. Vs. Rupa Chemicals, Vapi and or ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1986Guj156; (1986)1GLR101

..... 1894, bombay public trusts act, 1950, etc. we should not be taken to have expressed any opinion on the question whether s. 100a bars letters patent appeals against decisions of single judges of 'the high court while exercising appellate jurisdiction under such special statutes. all that we are concerned with in the ..... a single judge decides an appeal from an appellate decree or order, his decision will not attract the applicability of cl 15 of the letters patent as such appeal would be expressly barred in view of the aforesaid legislative provision. it. is obvious that from decisions in all appeals from appellate ..... entirely different and, that is, to the effect that a decision rendered under o. 43, r. 1 in miscellaneous appeal cannot be assailed in letters patent appeal because of s. 104, sub-section (2). that question never arose before the supreme court in the aforesaid decision in : [1953]4scr1028 and ..... s. 202,pf the companies act and other similar local or special acts. if these special acts could without affecting the jurisdiction of the letters patent or overriding the same provided a supplementary or additional jurisdiction, there was no reason why the civil p.c. also could not do the ..... that the judges followed a fallacious process of reasoning. according to their opinion, the appeals under the civil p.c. and those under the letters patent were, so to say two separate compartments having different spheres of their own. with due deference, we might point out that such a view is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 1978 (HC)

Patel Kashiram Lavjibhai Vs. Narottamdas Bechardas and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1979Guj1; (1978)GLR1047

..... the high court is subject to the ordinary incidents of the procedure of the high court viz., appealability under clause 15 of the letters patent.19. under these circumstances, we answer the question referred to us as follows 'an appeal lies against a decision of a single judge ..... according to the corpus juris secundum, supervisory power is akin to the power of superintendence. he further contended that when clause 15 of the letters patent was drafted and amended in 1919, the words 'revisional jurisdiction' used therein was confined to civil cases exclusively as distinguished from the cases arising ..... argument which mr. h. m. mehta, learned advocate appearing for an intervener urged before us. he contended that clause 15 of the letters patent is only confined to classical civil cases and does not refer to constitutional jurisdiction of this high court. he contended that constitutional jurisdiction is ..... or quash it. the revisional jurisdiction of the high court within the meaning of that expression as used in clause 15 of the letters patent embraces within its sweep all judicial orders made by courts, tribunals and other authorities howsoever they might have been described. such a function may ..... ) and shankar v. krishnaji : [1970]1scr322 ; and it was also felt that it was unfortunate that the attention of the learned judges who decided letters patent appeal no. 303 of 1977 : (reported in : air1978guj96 was not drawn to these two decisions of the supreme court in state of uttar pradesh v. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //