Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Year: 1973 Page 1 of about 18 results (0.013 seconds)

Sep 14 1973 (HC)

Somabhai Ishwarbhai Bhagat Vs. Natwerlal Chhanalal and Co. and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-14-1973

Reported in : (1975)16GLR130

..... for which it is enacted. now, section 7 confers a kind of limited protection on an intending patentee. it provides that after application for patent is accepted, as envisaged by section 6, the controller has to give notice thereof to the applicant and shall advertise the acceptance stating therein that ..... of patentee complaining of infringement of a patent or making, selling or using the invention without the licence of the patentee or against any who counterfeits it or imitates it. proviso to ..... infringement committed before the advertisement of the acceptance of the application.section 26 sets out the grounds on which application for revocation of the patent can be made and entertained by the high court. section 29 confers jurisdiction on the district court to entertain a suit at the instance ..... gone through the entire gamut of the suit, at the final hearing when the court was inclined to examine some serious contentions as to when patent can be sealed and in what circumstances, it can be revoked, simultaneously examining the question as to whether there was any inventive step taken ..... october 1971 but which, according to mr. p.m. raval, learned advocate now tells me, was sealed on 15th october 1971.2. the patent was in respect of a roasting apparatus and complete specification briefly describes the invention as providing a vertical rotating shaft, the vertical rotating shaft being .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1973 (HC)

Shushila Kesarbhai and ors. Vs. Bai Lilavati and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-04-1973

Reported in : AIR1975Guj39

..... be conferred on the high court by subsequent legislation. whenever, therefore. the high court exercises appellate jurisdiction whether by virtue of any laws or regulations in force when the letters patent of 1865 were issued or by virtue of any subsequent legislation, it does so under clause 16 read with clause 44. the high court in either case exercises appellate jurisdiction ..... original jurisdiction or appellate jurisdiction, the only condition being that the function performed by the, division court in exercise of such jurisdiction must be a function directed by the letters patent to be performed by the high court. it was common ground between the parties that clause 15 confers appellate jurisdiction on the high court by providing for an intra high ..... as may be prescribed thereby; and save as by such letters patent may be otherwise directed, and subject and without prejudice to the legislative powers in relation to the matters aforesaid of the governor-general of india in council, the high court ..... and all such powers and authority for, and in relation to the administration law justice in the presidency for which it is established, as her majesty may by such letters patent as aforesaid, grant, and direct subject, however, to such directions ,and limitations as to the exercise of original civil and criminal jurisdiction beyond the limits of the presidency towns .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1973 (HC)

Babulal Vadilal Vs. Ambica Iron and Steel Works Re. Rolling

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-04-1973

Reported in : (1974)15GLR474

..... be conferred on the high court by subsequent legislation. whenever, therefore, the high court exercises appellate jurisdiction whether by virtue of any laws or regulations in force when the letters patent of 1865 were issued or by virtue of any subsequent legislation, it does so under clause 16 read with clause 44. the high court in either case exercises appellate jurisdiction ..... original jurisdiction or appellate jurisdiction, the only condition being that the function performed by the division court in exercise of such jurisdiction must be a function directed by the letters patent to be performed by the high court. it was common ground between the parties that clause 15 confers appellate jurisdiction on the high court by providing for an intra high ..... may be prescribed thereby; and save as by such letters patent may be otherwise directed, and subject and without prejudice to the legislative powers in relation to the matters aforesaid of the governor-general of india in council, the high court ..... and all such powers and authority for, and in relation to, the administration of justice in the presidency for which it is established, as her majesty may by such letters patent as aforesaid, grant, and direct subject, however, to such directions and limitations as to the exercise of original civil and criminal jurisdiction beyond the limits of presidency towns as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1973 (HC)

Vasanji Kevalbhai and ors. Vs. Dahiben and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-26-1973

Reported in : AIR1975Guj25; (1974)GLR780

..... , it would not be proper for us to go into the merits and, therefore, on the three points on merits we express no opinion.10. in the result, the letters patent appeal must be allowed by reversing the decree passed by the learned single judge and by restoring the decree dismissing the plaintiff's suit passed by the learned assistant judge ..... p. 321, the division bench consisting of vakil j. and my learned brother had in terms held that a point going to the root can be allowed even in letters patent appeal. in the present case, section 4-a is sought to be relied upon by mr. vakil as a further facet of his argument in support of his main paint ..... municipality v. new chhotalal mills, ilr (1965) gui 145 = (air 1965 guj 293) where it was pointed out that ordinarily a new point could not be permitted in a letters patent appeal. that is not a rule of universal application. when a point is one which those to the root of the matter or is obvious point of jurisdiction which is ..... old section 31, mr. oza had raised a preliminary contention that this point having not been raised before the learned single judge, it could not be permitted in the letters patent appeal. we have already held that after the 1952 amendment came into force on january 12, 1953, all the provisions in sections 1 to 87 became applicable to these lands .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 1973 (HC)

Shah Harichand Ratanchand Vs. Virbbal and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-14-1973

Reported in : AIR1975Guj150; (1974)GLR499

..... that course to be adopted. the appeal of the wife against that order having been allowed on the point of jurisdiction as aforesaid, the appellant applicant has filed this letters patent appeal.2. the relevant section 25(1) provides as under:-'if a ward leaves or is removed from the custody of a guardian of his person, the court, if it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 1973 (HC)

Anjar Municipality Vs. Gaurishankar Purshottam Joshi and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-27-1973

Reported in : (1974)15GLR91

..... , another petitioner was added and at the time when the petition was disposed of, there were two petitioners in special civil application no. 87 of 1971. since both these letters patent appeals arise out of one and the same judgment, we will dispose them of both by this common judgment.6. mr. k.n. mankad for the original petitioners has contended ..... was made absolute to that limited extent. it is against this judgment and order of our learned brother that anjar municipality has filed letters patent appeal no. 94 of 1971 and the original petitioner has filed letters patent appeal no. 107 of 1971. for the sake of clarification, it may be mentioned that when the petition was originally filed, there was only ..... the basis of weight. the result, therefore, is that, in our opinion, special civil application no. 87 of 1970, should have been dismissed. we, therefore, allow letters patent appeal no. 94 of 1970 filed by the anjar municipality and we dismiss letters patent appeal no. 107 of 1971 filed by the original petitioners. the special civil application is dismissed with costs throughout. ..... b.j. divan, c.j.1. both these letters patent appeals arise from the judgment of m.p. thakker j. in special civil application no. 87 of 1971, decided by our learned brother on february 20, 1971. the petitioner in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 1973 (HC)

Nazarali Kazamali and ors. Vs. Fazlanbibi and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-10-1973

Reported in : AIR1975Guj81

..... court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit in absence of leave at it was really a suit for land with in the meaning of clause 12 of the letters patent. that objection was overruled and a preliminary decree was pass ed which contained a declaration that the court had jurisdiction to administer the said kurla property. from that preliminary decree ..... court had no jurisdiction to entertain a suit, with reference to the land outside the original civil jurisdiction of the court as no leave under clause 12, of the letters patent was asked for. this is how the matter came, again in appeal before the bombay high court which took the view that it had the jurisdiction. we may say that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1973 (HC)

Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Gujarat I Vs. Jayantilal Amratlal

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-13-1973

Reported in : [1976]102ITR105(Guj)

..... that interpretation advanced by mr. shah the ornaments made of gold, etc., and studded with precious stones would be considered jewellery only from april 1, 1972. the result would be patently absurd, inasmuch as the articles admittedly of jewellery can be included in the net wealth of an assessee only from april 1, 1972. we cannot accept any such interpretation which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 1973 (HC)

Vrajlal Chhaganlal Vs. B.A. Shariff, Commissioner of Income-tax, and o ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-24-1973

Reported in : [1974]96ITR217(Guj)

..... tax act, 1946. tilokchand motichand, the petitioner, applied by way of a writ petition before a single judge of the bombay high court and then by way of a letters patent appeal to a division of the bombay high court against the order of forfeiture and the division bench dismissed his appeal on july 7, 1959. the petitioner paid the amount .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 1973 (HC)

Punjiben D/O. Rana Chhotalal Nanabhai anr. Vs. Mohanlal Mansukhbhai Ga ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-02-1973

Reported in : (1974)15GLR107

..... costs.16. looking to the general importance of the question raised and the english decision cited at the bar in this appeal, leave to file an appeal under the letters patent is granted at the oral request of mr. shah for the respondent.

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //