Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 35 results (0.017 seconds)

Aug 07 1980 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-i Vs. Ahmedabad Manufacturing and ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-07-1980

Reported in : [1983]139ITR806(Guj)

..... the results of future research and development by the company relating to the products and furnish calico simultaneously with the execution of the agreement with all and any secret or patent formulations used by or known to the company for the manufacture of the products and as occasion might arise with all and any improvements, modifications and verifications thereof and any ..... companys standards. under cl. 3, calico was to be free to manufacture, sell and exploit their production of vinyl acetate in india and other parts of the world subject to patents and instructions outside the companys control which may affect such sales outside india and the company agreed to use its best endeavours to obtain such agreements with other parties as ..... and conveyed to calico the sole and exclusive right and licence to manufacture, distribute, sell and exploit the products and improvements, modifications thereof in india and use of any indian patents owned or to be owned by the company in respect of the said products. under cl. 2, the company agreed from time to time and at all times to make ..... derivatives of these and similar resins and certain monomers produced by a process of ester interchange such as vinyl caprate and vinyl aterate and others according to certain secret or patent formulations owned or controlled by the company. in this agreement, vinyl products ltd., is referred to as the company whereas the assessee-company is referred to as calico. the further .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 1980 (HC)

Jayantilal Bhogilal Desai Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-ii

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-25-1980

Reported in : (1981)22CTR(Guj)186; [1981]130ITR655(Guj)

..... capital gains are assessable in the case of transfer of goodwill, the indian act did not have it in contemplation, when enacting section 12b, that self-created assets like copyright, patents and goodwill should be subjected to capital gains arising on their transfer and hence capital gains on the transfer of a goodwill are not liable to be taxed under section ..... to pay tax on capital gains and profits under s. 41 (2) on different items sold by him under the aforesaid two documents in question, even then, the tribunal was patently in error when it held that rs. 13,000 were liable to be taxed by way of profit on sale of stock. 8. mr. divatia further contended that, in any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 1980 (HC)

Sharad Bansilal Vakil Vs. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-25-1980

Reported in : (1981)22GLR1019

..... justice or by the high court, is, therefore, consistently regarded by the statutes as a function in the administration of justice (see in this connection clause 8 of the letters patent for the high court's of calcutta, bombay and madras, section 9 of the high courts act, 1861, section 106 of the government of india act, 1915 and sections 223 ..... court has also been invested with legislative power under section 122 of the code of civil procedure 1908, section 23 of the contempt courts act, 1971, section 158 of the patents act, 1970 and other laws.13. the constitution also vests in the high court's administrative power besides the judicial and legislative powers. under article 237(2), the high court ..... of any law made by the appropriate legislature. it might be recalled that the legislative power of the high court has its genesis in the relevant clauses of the letters patent and section 13 of the high courts act, 1861 and that a similar provision was to be found in sections 106 and 108 of the government of india act, 1915 ..... of any law made by the appropriate legislature. the judicial power of the existing high courts at the commencement of the constitution conferred by the material clauses of the letters patent as well as by the then extent laws made by the appropriate legislature is thus saved by article 225 read with section 223 of the government of india act, 1935 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 1980 (HC)

K.T. Doctor Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Iv

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-09-1980

Reported in : (1980)15CTR(Guj)43; [1980]124ITR501(Guj)

..... trust (see p. 488 supra). in that case also, there was a power to the trustees to carry on business of marketing the product with the use of inventions and patents settled upon the trust and that was to be done with the idea of raising funds for the fulfilment of the aims and objects of the trust. when such activity .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1980 (HC)

Dr. Miss Bhavna P. Patel and ors. Vs. the Dean, Govt., Medical College ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-26-1980

Reported in : (1981)22GLR13

..... cause for the respondents to reshuffle the merit list which was prepared as per annex. e and consequently the reshuffled list at annex. g is completely misconceived and involves a patent error of law on the part of the 1st respondent who has tried to artificially read dichotomy in the uniform pattern of examination conducted by baroda university when in fact ..... and 4 in issuing the notice at annex. d does not get support from the judgment of this court in dr. vachharajani's case and consequently, the said action is patently bad.9. that takes us to the consideration of the second contention of mr. tanna for the petitioners. he contended that the university of baroda is the sole authority to .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 1980 (HC)

The State of Gujarat Etc. Vs. KutubuddIn Isafali Kushalgadhvala Etc.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-01-1980

Reported in : 1981CriLJ908; (1980)2GLR167

..... 20 of the act, there would be no doubt that the consent given by the competent authority in the instant case is valid one and the learned magistrate was, therefore, patently in error in holding that the authority competent to grant consent was the one authorised to do so prior to amendment and in acquitting the accused on that ground.9 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 1980 (HC)

Suhrid Geigy Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-30-1980

Reported in : (1980)2GLR424

..... strike down clause (a) in the explanation to the exemption notification will mean extending the benefit of the exemption notification to all companies which are engaged in the manufacture of patent or prorietary medicines.22. in the result, we allow the petition and declare that clause (a) in explanation to the exemption notification-g.s.r. 163 (e) issued ..... notification.19. lastly, mr. nanavaty has argued that clause (a) in the explanation appended to the exemption notification is such that whereas a wholly foreign company which is producing patent or proprietary medicines in india shall be entitled to the exemption under the exemption notification, the indian-incorporated companies with foreign element in them shall not be entitled to that ..... patients. it is only when the manufacturer supplies such clinical samples free of charge to a medical practitioner that the medical practitioner tries to find out the utility of such patent or proprietary medicines and prescribes them to his patients who are in need of them. therefore, the primary object which underlies the exemption notification is to made available to ..... distinctly different from regular trade packing and each smallest packing is clearly and conspicuously marked 'physician's samples, not to be sold;provided further (that) in respect of a patent or proprietary medicine aforesaid, the exemption under this notification will be available only for a period of three years from the date of first clearance of the said medicine from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 1980 (HC)

Ramprasad C. Dalal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-03-1980

Reported in : [1982]136ITR633(Guj)

..... the land at the relevant time computed with the entries in the record of rights showing the land to be agricultural land. thus, the tribunal's order suffers from a patent error of law. the tribunal has failed to apply the correct legal test to the proved and admitted facts on the record of this case and, hence, its judgment and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1980 (HC)

Sayed Mohmad ZayauddIn Shah Sahibmiyan Alti Vs. Noorbibi @ Vaziranbibi ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-26-1980

Reported in : (1981)22GLR120

..... order' is a term of well-known legal significance and does not present any serious difficulty. it has been used in various statutes including the code of civil procedure, letters patent of the high courts and other like statutes. in webster's new world dictionary 'interlocutory' has been defined as an order other than final decision. decided cases have laid down .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1980 (HC)

Pandit Gangaram Raghunandan Bhaiya Vs. Patel Motibhai Ramdas

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-25-1980

Reported in : (1981)22GLR254

..... case, as the lease was for manufacturing purposes, the suit notice dated april 16, 1971 is bad in law, and that being so, both the subordinate courts obviously committed a patent error in law in decreeing the plaintiff's suit for possession.31. since on the aforesaid point, i have taken the view that the lease in question was for manufacturing ..... ex. 26) terminating the tenancy is a notice giving to the defendant only 15 days' time for the purpose of terminating the tenancy. he urged that such a notice is patently bad in law, particularly when the dominant purpose of creating the lease in favour of the defendant was that the defendant should pre pare 'mava' from milk. he also urged .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //