Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 17 results (0.026 seconds)

Dec 01 1986 (HC)

C.M. Parikh and ors. Vs. V.M. Mehta and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-01-1986

Reported in : (1987)1GLR362

..... respondent r.m. adalja in the seniority list of superintendents (now section officers). further promotions of the appellants in the aforesaid three appeals, being letters patent appeals nos. 77, 95 and 96 of 1979 shall be given on the basis of their re-fixed seniority as aforesaid; and they shall be ..... , he shall be placed above his immediate junior respondent r.m. adalja in the seniority list of senior assistants and assistants. appellant in said letters patent appeal no. 77 of 1979 shall be deemed to have been promoted to the cadre of superintendents from the date on which his immediate junior respondent ..... in 1964. they were then promoted to the posts of superintendents. it is, therefore, obvious that these appellants are junior to the appellants in letters patent appeals nos. 77, 95 and 96 of 1979 in the cadre of assistants. we agree with the reasoning and conclusions reached by the learned single ..... which we shall have to consider while examining the submissions of the petitioners.25. mr. b.r. shah, learned advocate for the appellants-petitioners in letters patent appeals nos. 95 of 1979 and 96 of 1973, has raised the following contentions which are also adopted by mr. n. j. mehta, learned ..... at an appropriate stage.14. in order to appreciate the contentions raised by the appellants, it is necessary to refer the facts in brief from letters patent appeal no. 95 of 1979 (in special civil application no. 1996 of 1974). in that petition shri v.m. mehta, the petitioner, was recruited .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 1986 (HC)

Sanjay Mukundmi Desai Vs. the Registrar, South Gujarat University, Sur ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-23-1986

Reported in : AIR1987Guj48

..... elaborate arguments advanced by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant herein dismissed the petition at the admission stage itself. it is as against this order that the present letters patent appeal has been filed.2. the short facts of this case are that the appellant wrote f. y. b.com. examination held by the south gujarat university, surat, in september ..... aspects of the case and we are in complete agreement with the reasoning and the finding of the learned single judge of our high court. in these circumstances this letters patent appeal is dismissed.9. appeal dismissed. ..... gokulakrishnan, c.j.1. this letters patent appeal is against the order passed by the learned single judge of our high court in special civil application no. 1810 of 1986. in that special civil application, the main .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 1986 (HC)

M.S. Desai and Co. Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-18-1986

Reported in : AIR1987Guj19; (1987)1GLR375

..... , ministry of petroleum which are binding to all petroleum companies like the respondent and, therefore, the impugned order is contrary to the mandatory directions of the central government and is patently arbitrary and, therefore, it violates the mandate of art. 14 of the constitution so far as the appellant petitioner is concerned. in our view, this type of grievance cannot be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 1986 (HC)

Vedprakash Devkinandan Chiripal and Etc. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-03-1986

Reported in : AIR1987Guj253; (1987)2GLR1345

..... by invoking r. 30, defence of india rules. the supreme court upheld the power of the high court to grant such bail if it is satisfied that there is something patently illegal in the order of detention. in this connection, the supreme court held-'....we are free to confess that we have not come across cases where bail has been granted ..... contend that it is not protected by the presidential order of 27th june 1975, and by the provisions of art. 359 of the constitution at all. if that could be patent without any real investigation or inquiry at all, it may stand on the same footing as an illegal detention by a private individual. the mere presence of an official seal ..... of the constitution. in this judgment, beg, j., concurring with the majority view observed at paras 317 and 400 as under :-'317. it is possible that, if a case so patently gross and clear of a detention falling on the face of the order of detention or the return made to a notice from the court, outside the provisions of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 1986 (HC)

Anopsinh Jatubha Vs. V.K. Gupta, Dist. Police Officer and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-23-1986

Reported in : (1986)1GLR153; (1986)2GLR1; (1994)IIILLJ839Guj

..... fail since the procedure laid down under article 311(2) has not been followed on 'the facts and circumstances of the present case.7. for all these reasons, the letters patent appeals are allowed quashing the orders of termination passed by the respondents with a direction to reinstate the appellants forthwith with continuity of service. the appeals are allowed. no order ..... gokulakrishnan, c.j.1. these two letters patent appeals arise out of the oral judgment passed by the learned single judge of our high court in special civil application nos. 1329 and 1330 of 1984. the short facts .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1986 (HC)

Fatesang Gimba Vasava and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-19-1986

Reported in : AIR1987Guj9; (1987)1GLR219

..... vehicle into the forest area for the purpose of transporting the bamboo articles purchased from the petitioners since no action was taken against the appellant on that count. 15. letters patent appeal no. 211 of 1981 is allowed and the order passed by the learned single judge dt. 24th july, 1981 is set aside, and a writ of mandamus is directed ..... was done with the express permission of the forest officer or under any rule made by the state government in that behalf. in that view that we take, the letters patent appeal must be allowed.14. in the result the writ petitions nos. 1932 of 1982, 6252 of 1983 and 6275 of 1983 are allowed and the rule is made absolute ..... who reside in forest villages are entitled to insist on the compliance with the first paragraph of the resolution of 4th mar., 1972.11. we now deal with the letters patent appeal no. 211 of 1981 arising out of special civil application no. 1412 of 1981 filed by a dealer in furniture and other articles, such as, supdas, palas, toplas, etc ..... of broach district. the petitioners of writ petition no. 6275 of 1983 are also kotwalias residing in the forests of songadh -tapti range in songadh taluka of surat district. letters patent appeal no. 211 of 1981 arises out of writ petition no. 1412 of 1981 which was initiated by a businessman who was purchasing toplas, supadas and palas prepared from bamboos .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 1986 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Central Bank of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-23-1986

Reported in : AIR1987Guj113; (1987)1GLR437

..... and since the law does not enjoin a duty upon it to take into account public interest, it would not defer the execution against the state government. this stand is patently erroneous and absurd. in order to understand why it is imperative for the bank to be guided by public interest, it is necessary to refer to some of the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 1986 (HC)

Ashwinkumar Navnitlal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-25-1986

Reported in : AIR1987Guj132; (1988)1GLR95(GJ)

..... while considering the scope and ambit of section 108 of the government of india act, 1915 in juxtaposition with art. 225 of the constitution and clause 15 of the letters patent (bombay), made the following pertinent observations :-'the power that is conferred on the high court by s. 108; government of india act, 1915, still subsist' and it has not been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 1986 (HC)

Rasul Adam Votra Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Commission and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-12-1986

Reported in : (1987)1GLR493

..... birth were the same for the person who ought to have had the original school leaving certificate which has been produced before the respondents. hence, such a mistake, which is patent, should be corrected by the respondents and if the regulation does not permit the same, the said regulation has to be considered as arbitrary and unreasonable. mr. tanna further submitted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 1986 (HC)

Digvijay Cement Company Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-08-1986

Reported in : 1986(10)ECC359; 1987(10)LC7(Gujarat); 1986(25)ELT879(Guj); (1987)1GLR641

..... special civil application no. 2010 of 1985 which is the main petition. the petitioners have challenged the said order at annexure 'a' and have contended that the third respondent had patently erred in rejecting the application and in refusing the benefit of the proforma credit procedure to the petitioner's final product asbestos cement products. the petitioners have prayed for suitable ..... -rule (2) of rule 56a automatically applied to such commodity. in this connection, he submitted that the reasoning adopted by the third respondent in passing the impugned order is not patently fallacious in as much as once an excisable commodity is specified for the benefit of procedure under rule 56a, the question whether the inputs that is material or component parts .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //