Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 83 results (0.023 seconds)

Jan 23 2001 (HC)

Rajeev Indravadan Modi and ors. Vs. Instance Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. an ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-23-2001

Reported in : (2001)3GLR2010

..... arise. on the contrary, if the argument advanced is accepted, it would, ultimately, result into a situation where the provision granting jurisdiction to the district court for trying patent infringement suits would become redundant. it may also be noted that, at this stage, the defendants have only expressed their intention of making counter-claim and possibility of their ..... separately but in the written statement. admittedly, no written statement is filed. therefore, the contention regarding the transfer of suit under the proviso to section 104 of the patents act under which the application was tendered before trial court cannot be accepted. the proviso specifically provides that where a counter-claim for revocation is made by the defendants, ..... petition challenging the validity before appropriate forum and till that is filed and decided by the competent authority, this hon'ble court is required to consider the validity of a patent in favourof the plaintiffs, and therefore, injunction application is required to be allowed by this honourable court.' 11.1 in paragraph 10 of the affidavit-in-rejoinder, it ..... revisioners, who are the original plaintiffs in civil suit no. 11 of 2000 pending in district court, at vadodara. that suit is preferred by the plaintiffs alleging infringement of registered patent no. 183097 dated march 19, 1998, possessed by the plaintiffs by the defendants. in that suit, application for interim injunction was tendered and the learned assistant judge, vadodara, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2001 (HC)

Satish Maganlal Vora Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-10-2001

Reported in : (2001)3GLR2192

..... and alcohol which the appellant uses and raises the octane level. it was stated by his learned counsel that the appellant had even applied for a patent under patents act, 1970, but the concerned authority returned his application (which was shown to the court) for want of details of the process. however, since ..... the garb of an invented commodity. an invention is a new method, an instrument or device which is created by thought, one for which a patent can be granted. invention cannot be understood in the sense of concoction of a false story, invented to circumvent the statutory provisions enacted to ensure ..... a process for producing such substance (clause f); will not be considered to be inventions. that what is not an invention for the purpose of patents law cannot be consecrated as an invention by the court. otherwise, what the law denounces so very specifically by stating that an invention the use ..... did not want to disclose his trade secret formally, he did not apply again. 18.1 the word 'invention' is defined under section 2(j) of the patent act, which means any new and useful (i) art, process, method or manner of manufacture; (ii) machine, apparatus or other articles; (iii) substance produced ..... torture and agony to him by the impugned action of the respondents. 2.2 in special civil application no. 9076 of 2000 from which the letters patent appeal no. 692 of 2000 arises (in the title of which writ petition, the appellant had also mentioned special civil application no. 5981 of 1999 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2001 (HC)

R.P. Mistry, Since Deceased Through Heirs and Legal Repres Vs. Registr ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-20-2001

Reported in : (2001)4GLR3488

d.h. waghela, j. 1. this appeal, under clause 15 of the letters patent, is preferred from the judgment denying the relief of stepping up to the original petitioner, who, having passed away during the pendency of the appeal, is represented by his legal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 2001 (HC)

Bipinchandra Parshottamdas Patel (Vakil) Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-24-2001

Reported in : (2003)2GLR1577

..... error in holding that the petitioner was validly suspended under the provisions of section 40(1) of the code.27. as a result of the detailed discussion aforesaid, the letters patent appeal fails and is hereby dismissed, but in the circumstances with no order as to costs.civil application shall stand dismissed accordingly.after pronouncement of the judgment, learned counsel for ..... to for suspending the petitioner from his elected office of president. the learned single judge by his order dated 28-8-2001, which is the subject-matter of this letters patent appeal, has construed the provisions of section 40 of the act and held that the expression used therein 'detention in jail during trial' includes within its meaning 'detention in jail ..... d.m. dharmadhikari, c.j. 1. this letters patent appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner against the order of the learned single judge dated 28-8-2001 whereby the writ petition against the order of his suspension .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 2001 (HC)

Bipinchandra Parshottamdas Patel (Vakil) Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-24-2001

Reported in : (2002)1GLR319

..... error in holding that the petitioner was validly suspended under the provisions of section 40(1) of the code. 27. as a result of the detailed discussion aforesaid, the letters patent appeal fails and is hereby dismissed, but in the circumstances with no order as to costs. civil application shall stand dismissed accordingly. after pronouncement of the judgment, learned counsel for ..... to for suspending the petitioner from his elected office of president. the learned single judge by his order dated 28-08-2001, which is the subject matter of this letters patent appeal, has construed the provisions of section 40 of the act and held that the expression used therein 'detention in jail during trial' includes within its meaning 'detention in jail ..... d.m. dharmadhikari, c.j.1. this letters patent appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner against the order of the learned single judge dated 28-08-2001 whereby the writ petition against the order of his suspension .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 24 2001 (HC)

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Unjha Vs. Patel Jayantilal Purs ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-24-2001

Reported in : AIR2002Guj245; (2002)1GLR924

..... municipal council to act as a member of unjha market committee. the legal question raised both at the instance of market committee and the present appellants in these two letters patent appeals is that irrespective of constitution of a fresh elected body to the unjha municipal council, the nomination made by the erstwhile elected body of the unjha municipal council to ..... nominated him.12. for the aforesaid reasons, we find no ground to take a different view on the provisions of law as taken by the learned single judge. the letters patent appeals, therefore, fail and are dismissed. no orders on civil applications.

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2001 (HC)

Surat Mahila Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. Vs. Mamtaben Mahendrabhai Joshi

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-21-2001

Reported in : [2001(90)FLR666]; (2002)1GLR755; (2001)IILLJ567Guj

..... evidence of both the sides, especially considering the reasoning given by the industrial court, we do not think that we can disturb the said finding of fact in this letters patent appeal and accordingly, we confirm the order of reinstatement passed by the labour court, but we reduce the back-wages from 100% to 50%. the appeal is, therefore, allowed only ..... mala fide. accordingly, the learned single judge dismissed the special civil application by confirming the orders of the industrial court as well as of the labour court. the present letters patent appeal is filed against the aforesaid judgment of the learned single judge.9. mr. v. b. patel, learned senior counsel, has argued the matter in great detail and has taken ..... p.b. majmudar, j.1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the order of the learned single judge dated 9th may, 2000 passed in special civil application no. 8195 of 1999 (coram : h. k. rathod, j. reported .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2001 (HC)

Sonia Joseph Gonsalves Vs. Joseph Avroz Gonsalves

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-23-2001

Reported in : (2002)1GLR43; (2002)1GLR432

..... subject to the superintendence of the said high court, where the judge who passed the judgment declares that the case is a fit one for appeal; .....' under the letters patent, various jurisdictions are conferred on the high court. broadly classified, they are ordinary original civil jurisdiction, extraordinary original civil jurisdiction, appellate jurisdiction from subordinate courts, jurisdiction as to ..... the judgment, letters patent appeal will not lie against an order arising out of such review application. exercise of powerand passing of any order in revisional jurisdiction or power otherwise also is ..... are not appealable under clause 15. this proposition is extensively explored, exhaustively expounded and very well settled requiring no further detailed or meticulous articulation of principles.5. letters patent appeal does not lie against an order refusing to review the judgment passed in revisional jurisdiction also for the simple reason that if an appeal does not lie against ..... their privy council, as hereinafter provided.'4. it could very well be visualised from the plain perusal of the aforesaid provision that the clause 15 of the letters patent providing for intra-court appeal will not be attracted if the impugned order is in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. an order of a single judge exercising revisionat jurisdiction .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 2001 (HC)

Natwarlal Amrutlal Shah Vs. Employees State Insurance Scheme

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-22-2001

Reported in : [2002(92)FLR753]; (2001)3GLR2474; (2001)IILLJ944Guj

..... aggrieved by the order of the labour court, questioned the same before the learned single judge, successfully, and hence, at the instance of the original applicant, this letters patent appeal, before us.7. the appellant, original-applicant, had invoked the powers under section 33c(2) of the industrial disputes act, 1947, which reads as under ..... favour of the workman, for the following reasons.2. at this stage, admitted aspects may be narrated so as to comprehend, fully, the merits of this letters patent appeal.3. the appellant was appointed as watchman with respondent-e.s.i. scheme, ahmedabad (hereinafter known as 'the corporation'). he made an application for the ..... by filing special civii application no. 2294 of 1995, which came to be allowed by the learned single judge. hence, this letters patent appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent.4. there is no dispute about the fact that the appellant was working as a watchman and he was working from 8-00 p ..... the date of payment, with cost which is quantified at rs. 2,000/-.11. in view of the order passed in the main letters patent appeal, the civil application does not assume any survival value. hence, it shall stand disposed of accordingly. rule discharged.12. rule discharged. ..... j.n. bhatt, j.1. a short, but interesting question, which has figured in this letters patent appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent is, as to whether the impugned order of the learned single judge, whereby, the claim for an amount of rs. 2,06,068/- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 2001 (HC)

Chavda Jagmal Bhai Malabhai and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-09-2001

Reported in : AIR2002Guj48

..... in the bank, learned counsel submits that his clients could not withdraw the said amount. as now we have taken a final decision in the letters patent appeal and the public interest litigation, we direct the registry to return the amount of rs. 1,28,32,500/- to the appellants by cheque ..... as that they are not bona fide public interest litigants, and have filed the petition to support the case of the appellants in the letters patent appeal, that they have filed the same sensing the trend or the opinion of the learned single judge do not impress and persuade us to ..... much importance to several objections of technical nature raised by the learned counsel on behalf of the purchaser. objection such as that the appellants in letters patent appeal being members of the society should have resorted to remedy of raising a dispute under the provisions of cooperative societies act, is not a ground ..... provisions of the act apply to such varied or modified final development plan.23. learned counsel shri yatin oza appearing for the appellant in the letters patent appeal contended that may be in the proposed notification dated 24-9-1992 issued under sub-section (i) of section 19 of the town planning ..... -section (1) of section 19 of the town planning act proposing variation of the development plan in respect of the lands involved in this letters patent appeal and the special civil application. it is pointed out that in the said notification of proposed variation of the development plan, the condition of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //