Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Year: 2001 Page 3 of about 83 results (0.009 seconds)

Aug 09 2001 (HC)

insafi Kamdar Mandal Vs. Asst. Commissioner of Labour and Consiliation ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-09-2001

Reported in : [2002(92)FLR744]

..... any extraneous material into consideration in making the impugned order, whether it has decided the lis between the parties and whether the dispute is patently frivolous and opposed to the provisions of the act as also inconsistent with the agreement between the parties. the answer to the first two ..... court has, in saurashtra employees union v. sub-divisional officer [2000 (2) glr 1259], taken the view that in case the claim made is patently frivolous or is clearly belated, the appropriate government may refuse to make a reference.8.2 as observed by the supreme court in telco convoy drivers ..... be referred. a prima facie examination of the merits of the dispute is not impermissible and in case the dispute is found to be patently frivolous or clearly belated or if its reference is inexpedient on consideration of other relevant and material facts, the government may refuse to make ..... and for the exercise of such discretion even prima facie examination of the merits of the dispute cannot be excluded. if the claim made is patently frivolous or clearly belated the government may refuse to make a reference.the judgment of the apex court in secretary, indian tea association v. ..... and executed to end all the disputes. it was, therefore, submitted that the so-called industrial dispute raised by the petitioner-union was a patently frivolous dispute, the reference or entertainment of which was legally refused in exercise of the discretion vested in the government under the express provisions of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2001 (HC)

Sardar Patel University Vs. Harikrishna Chandulal Trivedi and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-05-2001

Reported in : (2002)2GLR1082

..... order as to costs.mr. nanavati at this stage requested that the implementation of this order may be stayed for some time as his client would like to prefer letters patent appeal against this order. in the facts and circumstances of the case, implementation of this order is stayed upto 20th july, 2001.

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2001 (HC)

B.A. Mewada Vs. Director, Govt. Printing and Stationery Department and ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-17-2001

Reported in : (2001)2GLR1570

..... to be allowed quashing the judgment and order of gujarat civil service tribunal in appeals.2. a few relevant and material facts giving rise to this group of five letters patent appeal, at the instance of the employees may be highlighted, at this stage, so as to appreciate the merits of the appeals and the challenge against them. the entire controversy ..... in this appeal. the decisionof the learned single judge on this issue also does not appear to be illegal so as to attract the power of letters patent appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent.14. the learned advocate of the appellants-employees has thereafter argued that even if the upgradation is upheld, the upgradation should have retrospective effect from 1 ..... . the present appellants felt aggrieved by the said judgment and order of the learned single judge dated 8-2-2000, and have therefore, preterred this letters patent appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent, mainly on the ground that the state government could not frame rules so as to retrospectively apply to the employees already in service. it has also been ..... due and proper calculation within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order. we, therefore, allow these letters patent appeals of the appellants above-named to the extent indicated above. the rest of the prayers in these letters patent appeals of the appellants-employees for directing the respondents to continue them in class iv service and to extend the benefits .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2001 (HC)

Babubhai Jethabhai Parmar and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-14-2001

Reported in : AIR2002Guj23; (2002)1GLR880

..... shifted from unjha taluka and included in sidhpur taluka. by the impugned notification dated 31-12-1999, kahoda has again been shifted from sidhpur taluka to unjha taluka.4. letters patent appeal no. 830 of 2000 arises out of the judgment and order passed in special civil application no. 18 of 2000 dated 20-10-2000. the said petition was filed ..... while reconstituting or abolishing talukas or shifting one village from one taluka to another taluka, arises in these appeals, both these letters patent appeals are required to be heard and disposed of by this common judgment.2. letters patent appeal no. 699 of 2000 arises out of the judgment and order dated 20-10-2000 passed by the learned single judge in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 2001 (HC)

Harish Kakwani Vs. Gujarat Institute of Educational Technology and ors ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-04-2001

Reported in : (2002)1GLR346

..... of the executive committee and the governing body. of course, in our view, this type of allegations and counter-allegations are not required to be considered in the present letters patent appeal.9. in order to find out the material on which ultimately the government took the decision to appoint respondent no, 3, we requested the learned a.g.p., to ..... the post in question. since the special civil application was dismissed summarily without notice to the other side, the state government has filed affidavit-in-reply in the present letters patent appeal.8. in the said affidavit-in-reply filed by the under secretary, education department, gandhinagar, it is stated that the selection committee is a recommending body and on its ..... action cannot be said to be mala fide. under these circumstances, the special civil application was dismissed by the learned single judge, which order is impugned in the present letters patent appeal.6. at the time of hearing of this appeal, it was argued by mr. patel, learned advocate for the appellant, that when the body of experts has already found ..... p.b. majmudar, j.1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the order of the learned single judge dated 28th august, 2000 passed in special civil application no. 8830 of 2000, by which the learned single judge .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2001 (HC)

Champakbhai Parsottambhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-11-2001

Reported in : AIR2001Guj200; (2001)2GLR1814

..... the foregoing paragraphs the uncalled for and unwarranted conduct leading to abuse and misuse the process of the court. there is no slightest hesitation in our mind that this letters patent appeal is absolutely baseless, meritless and frivolous and deserves to be dismissed with the following further directions :- 1. the court fee inspector who has assessed the shortfall of the court ..... judge, on 31-8-2000, and hence this appeal against that order of the learned single judge by invoking the aid of the provisions of clause 15 of the letters patent. 3. at the admission stage, we have heard the learned counsel of the appellant-original petitioner, at marathon length. we have, dispassionately, examined the impugned judgment and order of the ..... order of the learned single judge while viewed in the light of the latest propositions of law and underlined design and desideratum of the provisions of art. 226, this letters patent appeal is deserved to be rejected being totally meritless. this appeal is accordingly rejected. 20. appeal dismissed. ..... j.n. bhatt, j. 1. by this petition under clause 15 of the letters patent, challenge, at the instance of the appellant-original petitioner, is against the orderpassed in tax appeal no. 17 of 1998 by the director of transport, gujarat state which came to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 2001 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Saurashtra Oil Mills Association and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-19-2001

Reported in : (2002)1GLR375

..... passed by the learned single judge in special civil application no. 9446 of 2000 (rajmoti industries v. state, reported in 2001 (3) gcd 2530. (letters patent appeal no. 331 of 2001) and 9764 of 2000 (letters patent appeal no. 330 of 2001), by which these two special civil applications were allowed by setting aside the impugned order dated 26th july, 2000 at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2001 (HC)

Satish Maganlal Vora Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-10-2001

Reported in : (2001)3GLR2192

..... and alcohol which the appellant uses and raises the octane level. it was stated by his learned counsel that the appellant had even applied for a patent under patents act, 1970, but the concerned authority returned his application (which was shown to the court) for want of details of the process. however, since ..... the garb of an invented commodity. an invention is a new method, an instrument or device which is created by thought, one for which a patent can be granted. invention cannot be understood in the sense of concoction of a false story, invented to circumvent the statutory provisions enacted to ensure ..... a process for producing such substance (clause f); will not be considered to be inventions. that what is not an invention for the purpose of patents law cannot be consecrated as an invention by the court. otherwise, what the law denounces so very specifically by stating that an invention the use ..... did not want to disclose his trade secret formally, he did not apply again. 18.1 the word 'invention' is defined under section 2(j) of the patent act, which means any new and useful (i) art, process, method or manner of manufacture; (ii) machine, apparatus or other articles; (iii) substance produced ..... torture and agony to him by the impugned action of the respondents. 2.2 in special civil application no. 9076 of 2000 from which the letters patent appeal no. 692 of 2000 arises (in the title of which writ petition, the appellant had also mentioned special civil application no. 5981 of 1999 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 12 2001 (HC)

Patel Jitendrakumar Kantilal Vs. District Primary Education Officer

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-12-2001

Reported in : (2002)1GLR444

..... order against their proposed termination, and therefore, the termination order could not be passed in these three cases.6. similarly, the appellant in letters patent appeal no. 421 of 2001 had also obtained similar qualification of c. p. ed. prior to 1993 from amravati college and he also applied ..... -cause notices on 6th december, 2000 and they were terminated on 8th december, 2000 by the concerned district panchayat.5. the appellants in letters patent appeal nos. 398 to 400 of 2001 had obtained the same qualification from bharatiya sharirik shikshan mahavidyalaya run by hanuman vyayam prasarak mandal at amravati ..... notices, their services were terminated on different dates as per the details furnished by them in respective cases.3. similarly, the appellants in letters patent appeal nos. 381 to 391, 478 to 480 and 482 of 2001 had also obtained the qualification of c. p. ed. from bharatiya sharirik ..... and 12853 of 2000 were decided. whereas alt these letters patent appeals arise out of the common orders as aforesaid and we find that common questions arise for our consideration based on identical facts, we ..... 12420, 12415, 12234, 12419, 12486, 12321, 12417, 12418, 12423, 12214, 12424, 13032, 13242, 12489, 12516 and 12641 of 2000 and two letters patent appeal nos. 428 of 2001 and 439 of 2000 are directed against the common order dated i9th april, 2001 whereby the special civil application nos. 12877 of 2000 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2001 (HC)

Kantilal Damodardas Shah C/O Rajkamal Provisions Stores Vs. Union of I ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-26-2001

Reported in : (2001)3GLR2415

..... 26-12-1996, it was rejected by the learned single judge for the same reasons as were given for rejecting the special civil application no. 3477 of 1996.6. letters patent appeal no. 617 of 1997 arising from special civil application no. 8467 of 1996 filed by rajnikant, son of the detenu which raised identical issues was also rejected by the ..... by the respondents rejected the petition (special civil application no. 3477 of 1996) on the ground that it was barred by the principles of constructive res judicata.5. the letters patent appeal no. 616 of 1997 arises out of special civil application no. 8429 of 1996 which was filed on similar grounds by the detenu's wife pushpaben challenging the order ..... r.k. abichandani, j.1. these three appeals which raise common questions have been argued together.2. letters patent appeal no. 477 of 1997 has been directed against the judgment and order dated 26-12-1996 of the learned single judge in special civil application no. 3477 of 1996 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //