Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Year: 2001 Page 4 of about 83 results (0.006 seconds)

Mar 29 2001 (HC)

Khara Shamji Hirabhai Vs. Gujarat State Handicrafts and Handloom Devel ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-29-2001

Reported in : (2001)3GLR2300

p.b. majmudar, j.1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the order dated 24th july, 2000 passed by the learned single judge in special civil application no. 10395 of 1999. the learned single judge has dismissed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2001 (HC)

Ballkhan Doskhan Joya Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-09-2001

Reported in : [2002(92)FLR914]; (2001)3GLR2666

..... the intention of the employer in giving employment as disclosed from the terms of the contract of the employment and the subsequent conduct of the parties.4. in this letters patent appeal, learned counsel appearing for the employee has mainly criticised the reasoning of the learned single judge. it is submitted that the learned single judge erred in holding that although ..... d.m. dharmadhikari, c.j.1. this letters patent appeal by the employee of the gujarat electricity board has been preferred against the order of the learned single judge dated 29-2-2000 passed in special civil application no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2001 (HC)

State of Gujarat and 2 Vs. R.M. Chaudhary

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-17-2001

Reported in : (2001)4GLR3370

..... the aforesaid judgment and order of the learned single judge, the appellants abovenamed have preferred this appeal before this court under the provisions contained in clause 15 of the letters patent. it has been mainly contended here that the learned single judge has erred in holding that reasonable opportunity was not given or that the d.s.p. baroda, had recorded ..... d.p. buch, j.1. the appellants above named have preferred this letters patent appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent challenging the judgment and order dated 10.2.1994 recorded by the learned single judge in special civil application no. 4597 of 1981 under which the learned single judge allowed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2001 (HC)

Mahesh T. Rabari Vs. Director of Primary Education

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-25-2001

Reported in : [2002(93)FLR934]

..... and as expeditiously as possible but in no case later than a period of two months from the date of the receipt of such representation.9. whereas the main letters patent appeal itself has been dismissed, there is no question of any stay in the stay application. the civil application for stay stands rejected accordingly. ..... by the learned single judge so as to warrant any interference by this court. there is no substance in this letters patent appeal. the same is hereby dismissed. no order as to costs.8. we have decided this letters patent appeal on merits and we have found that the special civil application has been rightly rejected, the appellant's appointment was illegal ..... m.r. calla, j.1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the order dated 11th april 2001 passed by the learned single judge whereby special civil application has been rejected.2. the original petitioner and the appellant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 2001 (HC)

Gujarat State Financial Corporation Vs. Ashaben J. Dave and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-18-2001

Reported in : (2002)1GLR193

..... , be advisable that substantive special civil application be filed by her giving necessary details and facts in her petition. especially, when she has already engaged an advocate in this letters patent appeal, naturally, she can file a substantive special civil application. even otherwise, even if there be financial constraints on the part of respondent no. 1, it is always open for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 2001 (HC)

Umakant S. Deshpande Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-03-2001

Reported in : (2002)ILLJ21Guj

..... 1015 of 1990, 9850 of 1996 and 8508 of 1996. accordingly, the present six letters patent appeals are filed against the common order of the learned single judge. in all these appeals, the contention on the part of the appellants is that the appellants were ..... given written submissions which are also taken on record.2. the main question which is required to be decided in these letters patent appeals is whether accounts officers under the electricity board fall within the definition of 'workman', as defined under section 2(s) of the industrial disputes act, 1947. the ..... . so far as l.p.a. no. 346 of 2001 is concerned, the same is filed by the party-in-person u. s. deshpande and the remaining letters patent appeals are filed by advocate mr. n.k. thakkar. we have heard at length the party-in-person as well as mr. n.k. thakkar. mr. thakkar has ..... till the age of 60 years.3. being aggrieved by the said judgment of the learned single judge, party-in-person u.s. deshpande filed letters patent appeal no.346 of 2001, challenging the order of the learned single judge in special civil application no. 1595 of 1989. letters ..... patent appeal nos. 140, 462, 463, 464 and 465 of 2001 are filed against the order passed in special civil application nos. 5720 of 1988, 2924 of 1990, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 23 2001 (HC)

Chandanben Chunilal Patel Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-23-2001

Reported in : (2002)4GLR3502

..... that, thereafter notices under section 10(5) were issued on 17-12-1985 and 23-1-1986 and were served on the petitioner. this action was patently illegal, in as much as, the authorities could not have gone beyond section 10(3) of the act during pendency of the scheme of the petitioner ..... the act and not beyond that. if this is so, then action of the authorities in issuing notification under section 10(5) of the act is patently illegal and such illegal action which is prima facie borne out from the counter affidavit of shri s.a.patel can be examined in this writ petition. ..... extent, similar question has been examined by this court. no doubt, against the said decision, according to mr. sen, the state has already preferred the letters patent appeal which is pending. however, no stay has been granted by the division bench of this court against the said decision and, therefore,this is also required ..... treated as one pending on november 12, 1962 i.e. the date immediately preceding the date of enforcement of u.p. high court [abolition of letters patent appeals] act, xiv of 1962 which provided for abolition of appeals. the supreme court held that in considering the question as to the maintainability of an appeal ..... d.c. srivastava,j.) dated 5.12.2000 passed in special civil application no. 8402 of 1999, the state of gujarat has preferred letters patent appeal no. 1335 of 2001 before this court alongwith civil application no. 9661 of 2001 and civil application no. 9662 of 2001 and the said letters .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 2001 (HC)

Gujarat Mazdoor Panchayat Vs. Conciliation Officer and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-01-2001

Reported in : (2002)IILLJ70Guj

..... the petitioner are required to be rejected.35. in view of the above, the civil application for vacating interim relief is allowed. it is no doubt true that the letters patent appeals are pending but in my view, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this matter pending in view of the judgment of the constitution bench of the hon ..... in the case of air india statutory corporation (supra), is no longer a good law. it is no doubt true, that against the judgment of the learned single judge, letters patent appeal is filed and the same is pending, but in my view after the judgment of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of steel authority of india ltd ..... absorption would remain intact.24. it was further submitted that apart from the fact such a direction would not have been given, the matter is pending in appeal being letters patent appeal nos. 1299of 1998, 1319 of 1998, 1321 of 1998 and 1324 of 1998. it has been submitted that the aforesaid direction is no precedent for the proposition that the ..... well as the industrial disputes act, 1947.....'14. the 'decision in the case of food corporation of india workers' union v. food corporation of india (supra) is confirmed in letters patent appeal no. 447 of 2001 decided on june 20, 2001, by the division bench (coram: m.r. calla and n.g. nandi, jj). in para.2 of the judgment, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 2001 (HC)

Gujarat Mazdoor Panchayat Vs. Conciliation Officer

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-01-2001

Reported in : [2002(92)FLR728]

..... petitioner are required to be rejected.6.1 in view of the above, the civil application for vacating interim relief is allowed. it is no doubt true that the letters patent appeals are pending but in my view, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the this matter pending in view of the judgement of the constitution bench of the ..... in the case of air india statutory corporation (supra) is no longer a good law. it is no doubt true that against the judgement of the learned single judge, letters patent appeals is filed and the same is pending but in my view after the judgement of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of steel authority of india ltd ..... would remain intact. 5.6 it was further submitted that apart from the fact such a direction would not have been given, the matter is pending in appeal being letters patent appeal nos. 1299 of 1998, 1319 of 1998, 1321 of 1998 and 1324 of 1998. it has been submitted that the aforesaid direction is no precedent for the proposition with ..... , 1947.' 3.5a the decision in the case of f.c.i. workers' union vs. f.c.i. reported in 2000(1) g.l.h. 90 is confirmed in letters patent appeal no. 447/2001 decided on 20.6.2001 by the division bench (coram: m.r. calla and n.g. nandi, jj). in para 2 of the judgement, the division .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 2001 (HC)

Rafidbhai Mogal Vs. Jagdishbhai Govindbhai Dharajia and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-31-2001

Reported in : AIR2002Guj17

..... 6-2000. the order passed by the learned single judge to continue the interim relier till 3-7-2000, which was continued in the letters patent appeals on 3-7-2000 upto 5-7-2000 in the first instance and thereafter from time to time, ceases to be operative forthwith.15 ..... 2000 was rightly dismissed. we agree with the reasons given by the learned single judge in support of the order and hereby dismiss both these letters patent appeals and uphold the rejection of special civil application no. 5212/2000 and allowing of special civil application no. 5276/2000. no order as to ..... single judge heard both these special civil applications together and decided both these petitions by common order dated 26-6-2000 impugned in these two letters patent appeals -- at the instance of the incharge president rafiqbhai mogul in l.p.a. no. 266/2000 and amreli municipality and shri rafiqbhai mogul ..... collector, secured majority votes, is entitled to be declared as elected, was allowed and the rule was made absolute.2. whereas both the letters patent appeals are directed against the same impugned common order dated 26-6-2000 and common questions are involved based on identical facts relating to same dispute, ..... appeals have been dismissed, there is no question of continuing the interim relief. civil application no, 5238/2000 in letters patent appeal no. 266/2000 as well as civil application no. 5239/2000 in letters patent appeal no. 267/2000 are hereby rejected. interim order stands vacated. no order as to costs. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //